[STUDY #2] Using indexing services from BHW on orphaned pages

[shady185]

Yes, sorry for the late update. I have the indexing results tracked for the 22nd, but I'm not publishing it at the moment. I think I've spotted something fishy going on with one of the services which I believe has tainted the results. I've passed what I have on to @BassTrackerBoats to see what he thinks, but yeah I'm not sure the study will be continuing, and any other studies I do will probably be in private from now on.



Yeah it shows the cached page. I find (anecdotally) that pages that are cached tend to stick in the index for much longer without any further work needed.

This is a really nice study. Please don't discontinue it.

 

[Alexion]

Testing linksindexing with a set of blogspot.com domains that refuse to index for 3 months. Will update here to keep it relevant.

Anyway, thank you for your test study. It shows that not all services are created equal. We need some tests like these funded from time to time.

Out of curiosity, how much did you spend in total for all the services?
Asking for future references for us, in case some people will want to join to do these tests on a by-weekly basis.

I forgot to update this.

I submitted 10 links to linksindexing. 6 were from a new blog that I wanted to quickly index, 4 from a Blogspot i created in November and had yet to be indexed.

Everything got indexed after 48 hours, except one post from the Blogspot. Can't understand why that one didn't. I would have expected all of them to work since it's the same type.
But all in all was a decent run.

 

[terrycody]

I hope you can test https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/i...n-bhw-at-0-08-link-free-trial-inside.1388268/

Since I think it worked on some of my URL, I want to see a more large scale test.

 

[terrycody]

I forgot to update this.

I submitted 10 links to linksindexing. 6 were from a new blog that I wanted to quickly index, 4 from a Blogspot i created in November and had yet to be indexed.

Everything got indexed after 48 hours, except one post from the Blogspot. Can't understand why that one didn't. I would have expected all of them to work since it's the same type.
But all in all was a decent run.

can you test above link mate?

 

[Street Fighter]

There will be some interesting results following this study.

 

[genya]

Very interesting findings on linksindexing. Would all of types links be indexed? parasites? or does the content matter?

 

[coreyw]

Appreciate you taking the time to try to produce these results. Sucks that you think there might be something else going on.

 

[crazyStrap]

At this time Google is doing some changed. Perhaps testing should be paused for a week.

 

[13385]

Hi there, good to see other people test this.

Most of these services do absolutely nothing lol, they don't even send google-bot to the link you submitted.

 

[rogersantos13]

Lol how speed-links is the best? I bought their vip package 3 weeks ago and submitted 500 url for vip package and I swear 0 indexed i think their vip service is not working anymore. I try to contact with them about their vip service but not responded :S

 

[destroi]

Lol how speed-links is the best? I bought their vip package 3 weeks ago and submitted 500 url for vip package and I swear 0 indexed i think their vip service is not working anymore. I try to contact with them about their vip service but not responded :S

their vip service stopped working

 

[rogersantos13]

their vip service stopped working

Thanks for that information. Be careful guys for speed-links. They still offer this service and get payment about that. Also not responded tickets. Dont trust speed-links website and do not pay for anything for these scammers.

 

[schmeck]

Yeah I think I'm going to do a third study with another load of indexing services. Maybe next month?

Maybe you add our indexing service into your third study. Although many indexing services have appeared lately, each one is unique and I think it uses different methods.

 

[rebewos193]

Interested, thanks a lot

Any new update for this month?

 

[crazyStrap]

Interested, thanks a lot

Any new update for this month?

SinByte is still working, but, they stopped accepting RankerX and SEOAP links.

 

[korjim50]

Yes, sorry for the late update. I have the indexing results tracked for the 22nd, but I'm not publishing it at the moment. I think I've spotted something fishy going on with one of the services which I believe has tainted the results. I've passed what I have on to @BassTrackerBoats to see what he thinks, but yeah I'm not sure the study will be continuing, and any other studies I do will probably be in private from now on.

Is there any way you share those results. from which service provider we should stay away.

 

[Steptoe]

Sorry everyone, there won't be any more updates to this study. I stand by the results I've published, but after the 72 hour update I can see at least 1 clear attempt (in my opinion) at manipulation. My recommendation is to do your own tests on your own urls, and personally if I do any more studies like this I'll do them in private before I publish.

 

[Ozzyzig]

Sorry everyone, there won't be any more updates to this study. I stand by the results I've published, but after the 72 hour update I can see at least 1 clear attempt (in my opinion) at manipulation. My recommendation is to do your own tests on your own urls, and personally if I do any more studies like this I'll do them in private before I publish.

It's disappointing that there has been manipulation on this. Thank you for putting the time and money into this case study though. We all appreciate it

 

[joseramos]

I have been using linksindexing and its quite good

 

[crazyStrap]

My current situation is as follows:

for regular websites SinByte still works OK at 1c/link

for WEB2.0 I am using drip feed GSA links, it kind of suc..s, but it is, what it is.