Image in webp or jpg??
- Thread starter Thomas6
- Start date
ensus
Junior Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 139
- 199
My AI says:
It is feasible to observe sites that say that WebP is superior to JPEG, however it is more precise to say that WebP is a likely option in contrast to JPEG. This is on the grounds that JPEG is as yet the most generally utilized configuration on the web, and keeping in mind that WebP is a practical other option, it isn't yet a feasible substitution.\n\nCertain individuals will say that WebP is superior to JPEG in light of the fact that it utilizes a further developed pressure calculation, which can create a superior quality picture with a more modest record size. WebP additionally upholds straightforwardness, which implies that it can uphold different picture designs, like GIF and PNG. Be that as it may, there are a few drawbacks to WebP also. For instance, WebP isn't upheld by Internet Explorer, and isn't upheld by most programs yet.
It is feasible to observe sites that say that WebP is superior to JPEG, however it is more precise to say that WebP is a likely option in contrast to JPEG. This is on the grounds that JPEG is as yet the most generally utilized configuration on the web, and keeping in mind that WebP is a practical other option, it isn't yet a feasible substitution.\n\nCertain individuals will say that WebP is superior to JPEG in light of the fact that it utilizes a further developed pressure calculation, which can create a superior quality picture with a more modest record size. WebP additionally upholds straightforwardness, which implies that it can uphold different picture designs, like GIF and PNG. Be that as it may, there are a few drawbacks to WebP also. For instance, WebP isn't upheld by Internet Explorer, and isn't upheld by most programs yet.
Okay, what did you ask your AI?
ensus
Junior Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 139
- 199
- Jun 10, 2010
- 2,405
- 1,675
I use ImageOptim to cleanup my images. For anything else I use ImageMagick. I try to use JPEG over PNG because it provides smaller file sizes while still retaining image quality, but I use PNG if I need transparent backgrounds in my images. If I'm creating a WordPress website then I use a plugin like WebP Converter for Media which will convert and serve webp/avif images if the browser supports it.
As far as image dimensions go there isn't a one size fits all for the web because of all of the different device types and screen resolutions. You should really be serving responsive images by creating several image sizes and serving the correct image based on the support screen.
As far as image dimensions go there isn't a one size fits all for the web because of all of the different device types and screen resolutions. You should really be serving responsive images by creating several image sizes and serving the correct image based on the support screen.
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 70,936
Why not use a image optimization plugin that supports a fallback function for browser that does not support it then, your missing out.
Turbo B.
Elite Member
- May 24, 2015
- 2,854
- 1,636
On my wordpress sites almost all images are embedded. Where i use my images - jpg, png - it is not very big in size.
On static html sites i have an option to convert all images to webp with mod_pagespeed.
- Jun 30, 2014
- 13,755
- 5,221
Damn I didn't know so many people couldn't see them still!
rafark
Elite Member
- Jan 15, 2013
- 3,249
- 1,979
This. Support is still not that great by browsers and OSs. Maybe in 5 years.
- Nov 25, 2017
- 11,570
- 7,545
Bravo! - a hell of a lecture - I am reluctant to use webp
xReminisce
Elite Member
- Dec 29, 2012
- 7,329
- 36,654
PNG is comparable larger than JPG on it's own
I would only use PNG over JPG if it needs to be transparent.
I personally use WEBP, but i do have a fallback for JPG if they dont support it
Tixegeek
Registered Member
- Dec 20, 2021
- 75
- 20
If you're really concentrating on website speed, i recommend you to go for webp version. In general webp is 25 – 35% smaller in its file sizes than jpg.