Bluetooth.com/org/net/TLD
- Thread starter WhaTheFak
- Start date
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 71,099
Does this answer your question enough?
https://3pl46c46ctx02p7rzdsvsg21-wp...h/images/logos/bluetooth-logo-color-black.svg
https://3pl46c46ctx02p7rzdsvsg21-wp...h/images/logos/bluetooth-logo-color-black.svg
WhaTheFak
Regular Member
- May 10, 2019
- 220
- 74
Actually that doesn't answer it at all. https://smithhopen.com/2020/07/07/bluetooth-is-a-protectable-trademark/
Not sure about the legality of this. Far as I know, with Twitter handles at least, you CAN own a trademarked name on the internet (like taking @dr.pepper for example if @drpepper was their official @) but you CAN'T post content related to their niche. So for owning @dr.pepper, you wouldn't be able to post carbonated drinks (and would have to post something like cats for example).
Though I would imagine it's the same for a domain name. So you or your future buyer would be able to have the domain yourself, but you wouldn't be able to post Bluetooth related things. You'd have to step away from tech with your websites' content.
Though I would imagine it's the same for a domain name. So you or your future buyer would be able to have the domain yourself, but you wouldn't be able to post Bluetooth related things. You'd have to step away from tech with your websites' content.
WhaTheFak
Regular Member
- May 10, 2019
- 220
- 74
Alright, I'll put it up for sale, can you recommend a valuation tool? I tried some, but don't know how accurate they are.
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 71,099
As long as no one ruled otherwice, it is a protected trademark.
randomstrings
Supreme Member
- Feb 3, 2021
- 1,325
- 854
Lol, i never thought bluetooth .com actually exist, going to tryout a way to get a backlink from them.
- May 2, 2010
- 9,940
- 16,044
How can you get a backlink from there, when this has nothing to do with that either? Your name is indeed questionably correct.
randomstrings
Supreme Member
- Feb 3, 2021
- 1,325
- 854
This is off topic thing, and trust me bigger the site is, higher are the chances of orphan subdomain. Just need right scanning tool.
PS: i am not hijaxking the thread dear mods. Please dont fine me.
And what can you be fined for?
randomstrings
Supreme Member
- Feb 3, 2021
- 1,325
- 854
Read the rules.
RRunner
Power Member
- Sep 14, 2019
- 665
- 1,037
That's an odd court question.
What is the generic definition of Bluetooth? There is none. It is a trademark.
If you asked a bunch of people if "Kleenex" was a trademark they would also say no, not knowing that Kleenex is a brand trademark for "tissue".
Delta, as in "delta airlines" or "delta hotels", has a generic meaning. The land at the head of a river. Or the difference between mathematical values.
"Bluetooth" has no meaning outside of the networking protocol between devices.
The only argument I could see is that the owners have failed to actively protect their trademark and have, therefore, lost their proprietary right to it.
What is the generic definition of Bluetooth? There is none. It is a trademark.
If you asked a bunch of people if "Kleenex" was a trademark they would also say no, not knowing that Kleenex is a brand trademark for "tissue".
Delta, as in "delta airlines" or "delta hotels", has a generic meaning. The land at the head of a river. Or the difference between mathematical values.
"Bluetooth" has no meaning outside of the networking protocol between devices.
The only argument I could see is that the owners have failed to actively protect their trademark and have, therefore, lost their proprietary right to it.
- Nov 23, 2011
- 904
- 718
SO every single tech device that includes bluetooth is in danger, such as even tooth brushes with bluetooth speakers, TV, Smart TV, most if not all speaker brands and then let alone bluetooth.
The copyright is for the tech itself not for a domain name lmfao, i see you posting a lot in the past few hours and providing a lot of nonsense.
https://awesomeopensource.com/projects/bluetooth
Stop posting the dumbest shit possible.
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 71,099
I was answering this by OP
I have not said that he could not register a domain.
Stop being so hostile, seems like someone else posted the dumbest things now.
Last edited:
- Nov 23, 2011
- 904
- 718
Just calling it as it is, you are commenting without knowledge.
You where not at all helping the OP, Bluetooth has no trademark on a domain and there are so many different patents on this.
Your comment did not help the op at all, no information provided just useless spamming and I am not being hostile at all just do not want people like yourself confusing OP. which is kinda what you did.
But all good I am sure he or she is smart enough to figure it out.
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 71,099
I don´t get where you read in my answer, where I said anything about a domain.
Get your facts right, stop trolling the thread.
- Nov 23, 2011
- 904
- 718
Meaning your comment was absolute useless, so why even bother? Not sure how I am trolling but if you interpret it like that, it could count as pure aff signature spamming on your behalf.
Can't believe you reached the post count you did.
https://www.cnet.com/news/best-bluetooth-speaker/
https://www.techradar.com/news/audio/portable-audio/10-best-portable-speakers-1069079
https://www.amazon.com/Enhanced-Splashproof-Portable-Bluetooth-Radiator/dp/B010OYASRG
https://www.whathifi.com/best-buys/best-bluetooth-speakers-portable-speakers-for-every-budget
Just stop posting when you provide zero value for the OP.
Simple as that.
- Apr 4, 2009
- 13,911
- 71,099
I´ll rest my case, your just a smartass with a huge narcissistic ego that knows it all .. posting links to articles about bluetooth .. your a law rockstar .. haha .. =)