How Good is Conversion.ai ?

[Tom Chase]

That's not true.

Conversion.ai long form content is INSANE.

Better quality than most 5$/500 words writers on BHW, it can write about anything and it takes like 10-15 minutes to get a good 1k+ words article.

Only downside is that the information isn't always 100% correct and sometimes you need to edit / fact check

have you tried shortlyai ?

 

[seojen]

We use it and love it.

We use it alongside Surfer and also Frase.

It's a monthly service so you can cancel after the first month if you don't like it.

Oh and they offer 10k credits to test it out

What do you use Surfer and also Frase for ?

 

[MisterF]

What do you use Surfer and also Frase for ?

Structure and optimisation as well as content ideas.

 

[spectrejoe]

have you tried shortlyai ?

Nope not yet, does it also have long form content?

 

[bartosimpsonio]

Is this a promotional thread for this product?

 

[seojen]

I have tried all the ai tools on the market right now and I can say that for long form content, every tool except shortlyai is a waste of money.

I was considering to buy copy.ai to help me produce blog posts, so how do you compare it with shortlyai ?

 

[wpben]

I've used both shortly.ai and conversion.ai. Conversion.ai has the same features as Shortly when it comes to the long form editor. That is where you type some and then press "write" and it'll generate additional content for you. Usually 1-2 paragraphs.

Here's the thing. All these tools are "assistants". You won't be able to put in a title and instantly get an entire article back.

My biggest problem when writing is just getting started. Staring at that blank page is the hardest part for me. With Conversion.ai, I can give it a general topic and description of what I want the post to be about and it will generate an entire starting paragraph.

Here's something I just generated with it. I wrote about 3 sentences of the actual content. It wrote the entire outline at the bottom itself.




As other's have said, there are a few drawbacks:
1. Sometimes the content is not accurate. Incorrect statistics for example.
2. Sometimes it generates nonsense or copies what you just wrote.
3. There is a bit of a learning curve. Once you use the tool for a few posts, you'll better understand what inputs work the best.

I'm not affiliated with the tool at all - just a user.

 

[Tom Chase]

I was considering to buy copy.ai to help me produce blog posts, so how do you compare it with shortlyai ?

The one think I like most about shortlyai is the free hand writing. The input is automatically set to the pervious paragraphs (up to ~1500 words) and the ai writes with the context around that words. There is no forms, just commands (here are some commands https://aicontentdojo.com/shortly-compendium/). So you just click a button and the ai spits content with context. There is bit of learning curve but the output is awesome. and with every GPT3 tool you have to fact check and stich the paragraphs manually.

 

[Tom Chase]

I've used both shortly.ai and conversion.ai. Conversion.ai has the same features as Shortly when it comes to the long form editor. That is where you type some and then press "write" and it'll generate additional content for you. Usually 1-2 paragraphs.

Here's the thing. All these tools are "assistants". You won't be able to put in a title and instantly get an entire article back.

My biggest problem when writing is just getting started. Staring at that blank page is the hardest part for me. With Conversion.ai, I can give it a general topic and description of what I want the post to be about and it will generate an entire starting paragraph.

Try this compendium you wont regret it. >> https://aicontentdojo.com/shortly-compendium/
The cool thing about shortly is the context is automatically set. you just keep pressing the generate button until it spits put irrelevant content. then you need to give a new sentence to expand upon.

 

[wpben]

Try this compendium >> https://aicontentdojo.com/shortly-compendium/

That is interesting for sure. When I had shortly, they didn't make it obvious any of that was even possible.

At the end of the day, it seems like conversion.ai is just marketed a little better and has a slightly easier UI (different templates for specific things).

I have used both tools to generate long form blog posts. I think the key takeaway here is it'd be a waste to pay $5/article for PBN sites or for filler content when these tools can generate tons of words, usually higher quality than the cheap posts, with little effort.

 

[lyze]

I have been looking for a tool like this for half an eternity but always been disappointed because it never worked as expected.
I would be interested in whether there are other languages than English?..

 

[Shwepps]

As people already pointed it out here, it's often writes crap and incorrect info at all. And their 'long-form' is a bit misleading.

You put in a title and content description and then you can either write intro yourself or let it generate for you. Let's say, it generated good intro for you.
Then you go into 'long form' and click 'Generate'. At the end you can get at best 200~220 words with intro included, I wouldn't say that this is 'long-form' and I doubt Google considers it long too

What next? You write a few words and it should continue writing but often you get the same info you got before since (I guess) you haven't changed the content description. So you go and change content description.

And sometimes it writes info like 'If you want to see more subscribe here' like wtf Basically, it opens different sites and writes all info from them, even tho it's completely unrelated.

I'd say it's more like an 'Early Access' if you know what I mean. As a test you can check it out, but don't expect much. And those 20k word credits gonna get burn faster than light.

 

[iwillnbd]

Just gonna drop this here.

https://www.dealify.com/writesonic/...w0MjkFUUfgPB-BhH64bdoAu-zAvaylyWPc23qv5h7qC80

Disclaimer: I do not have any affiliation with neither the website mentioned above not the service there.

 

[spectrejoe]

As people already pointed it out here, it's often writes crap and incorrect info at all. And their 'long-form' is a bit misleading.

You put in a title and content description and then you can either write intro yourself or let it generate for you. Let's say, it generated good intro for you.
Then you go into 'long form' and click 'Generate'. At the end you can get at best 200~220 words with intro included, I wouldn't say that this is 'long-form' and I doubt Google considers it long too

What next? You write a few words and it should continue writing but often you get the same info you got before since (I guess) you haven't changed the content description. So you go and change content description.

And sometimes it writes info like 'If you want to see more subscribe here' like wtf Basically, it opens different sites and writes all info from them, even tho it's completely unrelated.

I'd say it's more like an 'Early Access' if you know what I mean. As a test you can check it out, but don't expect much. And those 20k word credits gonna get burn faster than light.

I literally can write a 1k+ words article within 10-15 minutes with the longform content.

The way I do it is after generating the description, I find what questions to answer, what Headings will I have, I put those in and the program fills those headings with text. Easy and quick.

And yes information isn't always 100% right that's why you just keep pounding the generate button until you get the right information or slightly modify it.

 

[Shwepps]

The way I do it is after generating the description, I find what questions to answer, what Headings will I have, I put those in and the program fills those headings with text. Easy and quick.

I tried to do it as well and it doesn't work 100%. More like 50/50: sometimes it does, sometimes it's not.

 

[HustleTong]

Anyone who've tried both Artocoolo & conversion?
Articoolo generates some plagiarized text here and there.
Has anyone encountered duplicate content on conversion?

 

[Willyfish]

Overhyped, BUT better than the competitors for the moment.

I personally saw 2 other tools that could change the way copywriting is done (beta version, don't ask me more) . I am impatient to see what will be the future of writing in the next 5 years.

 

[homeriscool]

Is this a promotional thread for this product?

nope.

Genuinely interested in it.

$99 per month is quite expensive for a writing tool if it's crap.

I'd happily pay it if it's up to the job though.

Only way to find out is to ask people on here using it.

Youtube is all Aff links so you never know what peoples real opinions are about the software.

 

[bartosimpsonio]

nope.

Genuinely interested in it.

$99 per month is quite expensive for a writing tool if it's crap.

I'd happily pay it if it's up to the job though.

Only way to find out is to ask people on here using it.

Youtube is all Aff links so you never know what peoples real opinions are about the software.

Don't they have a trial period?

 

[homeriscool]

Don't they have a trial period?

I'm just signing up to the pro account now for the 7 day trial.

Only real way to find out isn't it.