James Charles Temporarily Demonetised?

Podophiles do get treated nicely by the system. Every corner of society has been infiltrated by pedophiles. Billionaires were infriltrated by Jeffrey epstein, royal family infiltrated by prince andrew, BBC infiltrated by jimmy Saville, political parties infiltrated by certain MPs

It's a giant filthy pedo ring globally. And I would not be surprised if YouTube were infiltrated.

Copyright a video and your instantly taken down, announce that you've been grooming kids online and they are not sure whether to take him down permanently?

Heck, they even make child sex dolls now for these filthy animals.

In the UK you get more time in prison for carrying a weapon than you do sexually assaulting a child. Let that sink in, carrying a weapon, not using a weapon.

And if you get caught sexually assaulting children, you get put on a special wing with all the other podophiles, so you don't get harmed. They protect you.

And if it's your first time in the UK grooming children, you get a warning. No prison time.
Totally agree.
If me and you have a fight one on one in a car park we have a chance of going to prison for more time than someone who rapes a child.
There are people caught with thousands of child porn pictures and get suspended sentences. This blows my mind.
Jamie bulgers killers got out and one of them has been caught loads of times of having indecent child pictures and gets a slap on the wrist.
People go on about legalising drugs and things like that. This should be sorted out way before that.
 
Totally agree.
If me and you have a fight one on one in a car park we have a chance of going to prison for more time than someone who rapes a child.
There are people caught with thousands of child porn pictures and get suspended sentences. This blows my mind.
Jamie bulgers killers got out and one of them has been caught loads of times of having indecent child pictures and gets a slap on the wrist.
People go on about legalising drugs and things like that. This should be sorted out way before that.

Exactly it's a broken system, and I have a feeling it's because there's a lot of paedophiles in the system which prevent it from changing. There's a lot of big names that were paedophiles, and they were just the ones that got caught, essentially the tip of the ice berg logically speaking.

I see paedophile hunter videos on a daily basis, and have been for years, there's always a new paedophile to catch for these teams. It's deeply concerning that any person or organisation can be so lenient on a problem.

I see organisations taking the "no tolerance" policy on racism, hate speech, etc, but none of them on paedophilia? I'm going to guess it's a lot more damaging to get raped as a child than to suffer from verbal abuse whether that be racism, bullying or hate speech. What's comical is that we have days dedicated to raising awareness for issues like racism, bullying ect.

But nothing for kids being raped on a daily basis? It's almost as if the system condones paedophilia, it's sickening.
 
Paedophilia is wrong, it's been shown to severely damage children.

Referring to grandparents to compare societies is crazy.

That's like someone owning a slave and defending them with "but our ancestors had slaves, so that's just insulting to call him a bad person for owning one too in 2021"

You can't call upon past generators to justify actions in a current generation, times change, evidence changes. And paedophilia has been shown to be extremely damaging, which is why there are age barriers in modern societies.

Why are you bringing up Pedophilia, no one was talking about pedophiles and what James Charles did has nothing to do with pedophilia.


It wasn't even just past generations, it was literally like just a few years ago it was acceptable for a man in his early 20's to date a woman or man that is 16. Was it illegal, to have sex in many locations? Yes. However it happened and it was accepted as long as they weren't taking pictures/videos or were bragging about it. How the man in his early 20's acted was the more important issue, as long as he didn't do drugs, had a decent job, and didn't introduce her/him to shady characters he was okay.
 
Isn’t the age on consent 18 in America(correct me if I am wrong.)
So he was breaking the law and sexually chatting to minors and you are ok with this?
I live in the U.K. and it’s 16.
If I start grooming a 14 year old that’s fine in your eyes?
I think we have different opinions about this.
 
Isn’t the age on consent 18 in America(correct me if I am wrong.)
So he was breaking the law and sexually chatting to minors and you are ok with this?
I live in the U.K. and it’s 16.
If I start grooming a 14 year old that’s fine in your eyes?
I think we have different opinions about this.

In 34 states in America its the same as in the UK.

If he caused any harm he should just be required to pay for therapy, any lost earnings to due mental illness and be restricted from certain social media activities.
 
If he caused any harm he should just be required to pay for therapy, any lost earnings to due mental illness and be restricted from certain social media activities.
Yes and maybe we should take rapist out for day trips, murders out for ice cream, serial killers to the zoo.
If you are happy with older people grooming youngsters I will leave you to it.
 
Mmm a lot of false information spreading here...
i have no idéee that pesron existed untill i saw this threads, im glad i dont. and yes i use youtube evry time and never seen that thing, if yo happend to seen him in your browspage then maybe youtube algo got stupid orsomehow you are watching that nonsense... anyway
and i see a lot of people talking here about the limit age for a girl dating or getting married having relation..., i mean you cant be sure some girls are readdy(adult) at age 14 15 16 17 18(and that the AVG age of the current time).. and in the past they may get 11 or 12 13 .. this is not in our control.. but if your country or gouvernement tells 18 YO is the age of getting married a girl or having relation with here then you should do that .. and dont say why in the past did did married girls at age 13... or whathever... cause people are changing so the rules....


i dont knew if i got what you said, but if i do a crime that makes me a bad person, a criminal, we cant justify that.
I read it on the BBC news. I'm not into gay make up tutorials if that's what you're insinuating and if I was, I wouldn't deny it. But for the rest, I agree. If the law says 18 or whatever is the legal age in a given country, there's no excuse.
 
Yes and maybe we should take rapist out for day trips, murders out for ice cream, serial killers to the zoo.
If you are happy with older people grooming youngsters I will leave you to it.

Its flirting not grooming, and a 16 year isn't really a youngster.

You're acting like he's doing michael jackson type of shit.
 
WTF! Temporarily demonetised? The filthy bastard was grooming minors. If that was any of us and we did something half as bad just once, our complete channel would have been taken down immediately.

Any ideas why he's been treated so leniently? Maybe he's making YouTube too much money?

James Charles: YouTube temporarily demonetises beauty influencer
I don’t want to talk too much about this because I know and understand it’s a delicate topic. But he was 21 possibly 20 when he was caught sending messages to 16 years olds (according to the article you posted). It’s not that he was a 30 o 40 year old creep. The age gap in this case is not that big in my opinion.
 
Back
Top