James Charles Temporarily Demonetised?

[ExperimentalSEO]

But he is not a regular person. He had put himself in the public eye. And that’s how he makes his money.
Also he knows the law in his country and broke it.
I can’t go to an Arab dry country and drink then say well in my country it’s different so technically I never broke the law.

In this case its private institutions dealing with him, they can choose to see something as wrong or right separate of the law. You aren't required to recognize something as a crime unless you are legally required to do so.

Youtube can say even if he is convicted, "what he didn't wasn't really wrong and shouldn't even be a crime", and continue to let him not only keep his channel but also monetize it.

However, a school couldn't hire him if convicted because he wouldn't be allowed to be around minors.

 

[James2]

In this case its private institutions dealing with him, they can choose to see something as wrong or right separate of the law. You aren't required to recognize something as a crime unless you are legally required to do so.

Youtube can say even if he is convicted, "what he didn't wasn't really wrong and shouldn't even be a crime", and continue to let him not only keep his channel but also monetize it.

However, a school couldn't hire him if convicted because he wouldn't be allowed to be around minors.

Yes, but it is a crime in the country where YouTube is situated regardless of anyone's personal feelings on the matter.

 

[ExperimentalSEO]

Yes, but it is a crime in the country where YouTube is situated regardless of anyone's personal feelings on the matter.

And?

You are still allowed to hire people convicted of crimes if you want to.

 

[James2]

And?

You are still allowed to hire people convicted of crimes if you want to.

You just want to argue don't you. Go away man.

 

[polecat]

WTF! Temporarily demonetised? The filthy bastard was grooming minors. If that was any of us and we did something half as bad just once, our complete channel would have been taken down immediately.

Any ideas why he's been treated so leniently? Maybe he's making YouTube too much money?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56811134

If you want a real answer at the moment gays are a protected group of people so he can, in theory, get off with it for now.

 

[ExperimentalSEO]

You just want to argue don't you. Go away man.

He doesn't deserve to be banned from earning money. Permently banning people from earning money for things they did in the past and have since apologized for and changed their ways is wrong.

 

[James2]

He doesn't deserve to be banned from earning money. Permently banning people from earning money for things they did in the past and have since apologized for and changed their ways is wrong.

That is not what I was originally asking. I wanted to know why he was treated so softly when the likes of us would have been banned instantly.

 

[ExperimentalSEO]

That is not what I was originally asking. I wanted to know why he was treated so softly when the likes of us would have been banned instantly.

I don't think YouTube would actually ban a non high earner for being accused of the same.

There's channels still up of those that only have under 10,000 subscribers and were accused of worse than James Charles. KandancePinder not only has been charged with multiple counts of child sexual exploitation, but she also uploaded child porn to another google platform, yet the Youtube Channel remains up.

https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/Kadence_Pinderhttps://www.abc4.com/news/local-new...-charged-with-sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor/

 

[James2]

I don't think YouTube would actually ban a non high earner for being accused of the same.

There's channels still up of those that only have under 10,000 subscribers and were accused of worse than James Charles. KandancePinder not only has been charged with multiple counts of child sexual exploitation, but she also uploaded child porn to another google platform, yet the Youtube Channel remains up.

https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/Kadence_Pinderhttps://www.abc4.com/news/local-new...-charged-with-sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor/

That's even worse man. Looks like don't want any political fallout. We had a similar thing in the UK a few years ago where multiple young girls were groomed, raped and abused by a gang of men from a minority group, but weren't brought to justice as soon as they should have been. The local authority, police, social services etc didn't take action in a timely manner for fear of being branded as racist.

 

[Rmc1225]

He's a trainwreck, it's hard to not look

 

[MrDenz]

I don't think there are too many members around BHW interested in "beauty" or whoever that guy is

 

[James2]

I don't think there are too many members around BHW interested in "beauty" or whoever that guy is

Nor am I. I'm more interested in why YT is massively more lenient with him than most of everyone else.

 

[ExperimentalSEO]

Nor am I. I'm more interested in why YT is massively more lenient with him than most of everyone else.

Because kicking him off would hurt themselves as well.

 

[buddhiststudent718]

I don't agree with kids getting married at 16, but that's besides the point I am trying to make here. I dont think you can just get married at 16 here anyway. You need parental permission. Where he lives, it's a crime and he was fully aware of that. He has got away with it until now where most other people would have been banned instantly and that, in my opinion is wrong.

your kid grandparents got married when they were 16 and before them they got married when they were 13.

no disrespect

 

[ExperimentalSEO]

your kid grandparents got married when they were 16 and before them they got married when they were 13.

no disrespect

When I was in High School, it was okay for a Senior (18) to date a freshman(14), and some girls that were 15/16 were dating guys around 20/21. There wasn't much drama around a guy in his earlier 20's dating a girl that was 16 or 17, as long as he a good guy and wasn't some kind of "loser".

It wasn't until the last few years that relationship age difference shaming really took off, there's so much bullshit targeted at even adults that are too separate in age.

 

[buddhiststudent718]

When I was in High School, it was okay for a Senior (18) to date a freshman(14), and some girls that were 15/16 were dating guys around 20/21. There wasn't much drama around a guy in his earlier 20's dating a girl that was 16 or 17, as long as he a good guy and wasn't some kind of "loser".

It wasn't until the last few years that relationship age difference shaming really took off, there's so much bullshit targeted at even adults that are too separate in age.

before this google internet diaper era, when life was hard ,a 16 year old was considered a "grown ass man"

 

[James2]

your kid grandparents got married when they were 16 and before them they got married when they were 13.

no disrespect

None taken and I don't think they were that young. Maybe 18 or so, but I see your point. Anyway, a lot of things that were seen as normal in the past aren't anymore. Just because something used to be the norm doesn't make it right today.

 

[jake lionar]

Mmm a lot of false information spreading here...
i have no idéee that pesron existed untill i saw this threads, im glad i dont. and yes i use youtube evry time and never seen that thing, if yo happend to seen him in your browspage then maybe youtube algo got stupid orsomehow you are watching that nonsense... anyway
and i see a lot of people talking here about the limit age for a girl dating or getting married having relation..., i mean you cant be sure some girls are readdy(adult) at age 14 15 16 17 18(and that the AVG age of the current time).. and in the past they may get 11 or 12 13 .. this is not in our control.. but if your country or gouvernement tells 18 YO is the age of getting married a girl or having relation with here then you should do that .. and dont say why in the past did did married girls at age 13... or whathever... cause people are changing so the rules....

Just because it's a crime doesn't make him some kind of bad person.

i dont knew if i got what you said, but if i do a crime that makes me a bad person, a criminal, we cant justify that.

 

[Dark Sky]

Podophiles do get treated nicely by the system. Every corner of society has been infiltrated by pedophiles. Billionaires were infriltrated by Jeffrey epstein, royal family infiltrated by prince andrew, BBC infiltrated by jimmy Saville, political parties infiltrated by certain MPs

It's a giant filthy pedo ring globally. And I would not be surprised if YouTube were infiltrated.

Copyright a video and your instantly taken down, announce that you've been grooming kids online and they are not sure whether to take him down permanently?

Heck, they even make child sex dolls now for these filthy animals.

In the UK you get more time in prison for carrying a weapon than you do sexually assaulting a child. Let that sink in, carrying a weapon, not using a weapon.

And if you get caught sexually assaulting children, you get put on a special wing with all the other podophiles, so you don't get harmed. They protect you.

And if it's your first time in the UK grooming children, you get a warning. No prison time.

 

[Dark Sky]

Just because it's a crime doesn't make him some kind of bad person.

If he is a "bad person" for what he did, then it's calling the grandparents or great grandparents of many BHW members bad people as well. Which is just insulting, and there is no need for it.

When I was in High School, it was okay for a Senior (18) to date a freshman(14), and some girls that were 15/16 were dating guys around 20/21. There wasn't much drama around a guy in his earlier 20's dating a girl that was 16 or 17, as long as he a good guy and wasn't some kind of "loser".

It wasn't until the last few years that relationship age difference shaming really took off, there's so much bullshit targeted at even adults that are too separate in age.

Paedophilia is wrong, it's been shown to severely damage children.

Referring to grandparents to compare societies is crazy.

That's like someone owning a slave and defending them with "but our ancestors had slaves, so that's just insulting to call him a bad person for owning one too in 2021"

You can't call upon past generators to justify actions in a current generation, times change, evidence changes. And paedophilia has been shown to be extremely damaging, which is why there are age barriers in modern societies.