Nope, I never made that assumption about the ebook. I've not lumped you into this either saying it's shit or the services neither. eBooks are what they are. Down to the reader to decide.
This entire thing is how I think
@Psh was banned for a heat of the moment post because of a reply he made in a public post has been taken as a "request" and is "serious" I have more of an issue with the rest of the market place than ebooks are concerned so no need to worry there.
Take the SEO section if they keep approving new users they push others down the list, the only way to win there is to pay out $390 a week to the pinned post. IF anyone and everyone can pin what value or worth is assigned there to the buyer of the service? None.. it's all down to how deep someones pockets are.
You lumped me into it when you said this...
His (Psh) points where valid...
Basically his point was all ebooks, but nothing else, are plagiarised and just designed to rip off the reader and so should be banned.
That I disagree with.
But, on your wider point in your last comment as a marketplace seller I actually agree with you there should be more quality control.
To give you an example of the approval process, ebooks have to go through a plagiarism check.
Mine is about 90% original.
Would you like to know why it is not what it is, which is 100% original?
I have quoted myself on previously published posts.
I have used phrases like "the first step is" and "the next step is" which are common in any book.
There are other ebooks which I have purchased that have a higher score and you know why?
The writer can barely speak English so the sentences are utter nonsense but are unique!
So, technically speaking they get a higher score than mine, even though as a book it is shit!
In short improvement in quality control, yes, outright ban on ebooks, no.
As you did not answer my other point, am I correct in thinking you do not want me to explain in detail why I said no to your project as it stands?