The vaccine is rolling out

Have you been in a metal health hospital before, why do you keep chatting like the world is a scam

Stop bitching to @VSYNC your getting offensive stop it be nice on here.

Voice your opinion in a nice way not a horrible way.

We are all friends don't get personal ok .
My point was, I don't believe any of those things. Vsync was arguing that they are valid arguments unless you can provide the burden of proof that there aren't chips in vaccines and that the government isn't changing your quantum state.

I was stating that both of those things are ridiculous.
 
My point was, I don't believe any of those things. Vsync was arguing that they are valid arguments unless you can provide the burden of proof that there aren't chips in vaccines and that the government isn't changing your quantum state.

I was stating that both of those things are ridiculous.
You still don't get the basic point of what I was saying.

Please read this 5 times back-to-back:

I was not arguing that "those points are valid unless you can prove them to be false".

That isn't how basic logic works, and it's not what I said once.

I was saying that if you say there aren't microchips in vaccines (as just one example) then the burden of proof is on you to prove that statement.

You are making the affirmative statement in that case "I know there aren't microchips in vaccines" so you have to prove it.



Simple concept, no?

My point was, I don't believe any of those things.
Yes, and your belief is as valid/invalid as anyone else's! Again, pretty simple. It means you aren't right, it's just an opinion/belief. As valid as the belief that microchips are in vaccines haha :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


I was stating that both of those things are ridiculous.
This is your opinion. Do you understand that? It means not empirically true :alien:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You still don't get the basic point of what I was saying.

Please read this 5 times back-to-back:

I was not arguing that "those points as are valid unless you can prove them to be false".

That isn't how basic scientific logic works, and it's not what I stated once.

I was saying that if you say there aren't microchips in vaccines (as just one example) then the burden of proof is on you to prove that statement.

You are making the affirmative statement in that case "I know there aren't microchips in vaccines" so you have to prove it.



Simple concept, no?


Yes, and your belief is as valid/invalid as anyone else's! Again, pretty simple. It means you aren't right, it's just an opinion/belief. As valid as the belief that microchips are in vaccines haha :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Yes, but you're only arguing with anyone that is not antivaxx. If you're going to police the forums for wording, then my opinion is that you need to do this for both sides.

There are substantially more outlandish claims on here that you have not disputed.

Let's face it, you have an agenda and you do not care a jot about truth, only pushing your antivaxx sentiment.
 
Yes, but you're only arguing with anyone that is not antivaxx. If you're going to police the forums for wording, then my opinion is that you need to do this for both sides.

There are substantially more outlandish claims on here that you have not disputed.

Let's face it, you have an agenda and you do not care a jot about truth, only pushing your antivaxx sentiment.
Why do you so readily play the victim instead of focusing on the meat of what we're talking about? I don't get it.

Instead of saying, "you know what, what you said makes some sense and I get what you mean", you have to deflect with me not discussing with people equally on both sides and me having an agenda.

News flash: every person that's commented on this thread has an opinion one way or another and is focusing more on putting their perspective forward against people that disagree with them. You're doing the same thing (having an agenda) that you're accusing me of, and it's such a weak and crappy point to be in a discussion and complain that people you disagree with aren't disagreeing with people they agree with enough haha.

Look, yes.. there are seriously whack claims relating to vaccines that a complete bullshit and should be ignored for the most part. I've already said pretty much that. If the only thing you're here for is pointing that out, congrats - there are ridiculous claims relating to vaccines.

But there is a lot that you don't know that you're acting like you do know and that is my only point right now. You don't seem to be able to find the courage to honestly admit that, so enjoy deluding yourself I guess.

Not being able to agree with the person you're disagreeing with even 1% is a real sign of weakness btw. Not saying you're a weak person, but when you concede some things which are obvious, even if you disagree with everything else, it shows that you have some balance in your thinking, integrity, and that you care about the truth even when it doesn't support what you're saying - admitting that actually shows strength and confidence in the validity of your opinions.

You not only can't admit a single thing that I've said is accurate, but you can't even focus on discussing things without needing to deflect or saying that I've said things I didn't.. it's a bad look from where I'm sat man. If there's no need to be honest at all in a discussion like this, what's the point?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do you so readily play the victim instead of focusing on the meat of what we're talking about? I don't get it.

Instead of saying, "you know what, what you said makes some sense and I get what you mean", you have to deflect with me not discussing with people equally on both sides and me having an agenda.

News flash: every person that's commented on this thread has an opinion one way or another and is focusing more on putting their perspective forward against people that disagree with them. You're doing the same thing (having an agenda) that you're accusing me of, and it's such a weak and crappy point to be in a discussion and complain that people you disagree with aren't disagreeing with people they agree with enough haha.

Look, yes.. there are seriously whack claims relating to vaccines that a complete bullshit and should be ignored for the most part. I've already said pretty much that. If the only thing you're here for is pointing that out, congrats - there are ridiculous claims relating to vaccines.

But there is a lot that you don't know that you're acting like you do know and that is my only point right now. You don't seem to be able to find the courage to honestly admit that, so enjoy deluding yourself I guess.
Sure thing mate. Keep liking those government is mind controlling us memes. And God forgive if someone points out how nutty they are, cos you'll be right there to argue they didn't word there arguments the right way.
 
I cant trust any government. I'm sorry. Id rather not comply with billgates plan to make 90% of the population "Infertile" to control the population on the world.
 
Sure thing mate. Keep liking those government is mind controlling us memes. And God forgive if someone points out how nutty they are, cos you'll be right there to argue they didn't word there arguments the right way.
This (time it) started from you saying we didn't vibrate, and I pointed out we do and that it's funny considering that the only way I know that is because of watching conspiracy videos, which you no doubt deem retarded bullshit, however you ironically didn't know what the conspiracy video maker knew.

If you could have just gone, "oh ok, yeah right, we do vibrate and that's the only point he was making", then the way you've been forming your arguments wouldn't have been brought up.

The shame is that I'm sure that you think that you're closer to being "scientific" than "crazy ani-vaxxers". The fact that you consider the way you argue to be irrelevant and me bringing that up to be "policing wording" shows how little you actually give a shit about being "scientific".

It's not policing words, it's being accurate in the way to put your points forward - do it or don't do it, but don't expect to argue with me that way while telling me how "unscientific" my views are and then expect me not to bring that up.
 
China is able to use extreme measures to prevent the spread.
If a single case occurs within a city, the entire city is put into lockdown and every single resident is tested.
False! I'm in Hong Kong Right now and plenty of people are testing positive for the virus and the survival rate is about 99.8% LMAO(no one is going door to door forcing testing or closing businesses) ........This is a ONE WORLD ORDER PLAN TO CONTROL THE POPULATION of this planet. As you all know the earth could not sustain another 200 years with over 10 BILLION people on it with 99% being all Consumers. All of the governments have come together to push this to save the earth.
 
This (time it) started from you saying we didn't vibrate, and I pointed out we do and that it's funny considering that the only way I know that is because of watching conspiracy videos, which you no doubt deem retarded bullshit, however you ironically didn't know what the conspiracy video maker knew.

If you could have just gone, "oh ok, yeah right, we do vibrate and that's the only point he was making", then the way you've been forming your arguments wouldn't have been brought up.

The shame is that I'm sure that you think that you're closer to being "scientific" than "crazy ani-vaxxers". The fact that you consider the way you argue to be irrelevant and me bringing that up to be "policing wording" shows how little you actually give a shit about being "scientific".

It's not policing words, it's being accurate in the way to put your points forward - do it or don't do it, but don't expect to argue with me that way while telling me how "unscientific" my views are and then expect me not to bring that up.
Not quite right.
I am well aware of vibrations as a theory within the quantum world.
However, the idea that the Government is changing you on an atomic level is so far out there, I didn't even think that was what he meant.
If the meme had said the Government is changing your quantum vibrations on an atomic level, I would still think it's batshit crazy, but I would have had a better idea of what it was meaning.
It didn't say that, it said the Government is changing (reducing) your vibrations, which is quite different.
 
False! I'm in Hong Kong Right now and plenty of people are testing positive for the virus and the survival rate is about 99.8% LMAO(no one is going door to door forcing testing or closing businesses) ........This is a ONE WORLD ORDER PLAN TO CONTROL THE POPULATION of this planet. As you all know the earth could not sustain another 200 years with over 10 BILLION people on it with 99% being all Consumers. All of the governments have come together to push this to save the earth.

If you want to control the population you give out free condoms and birth control pills to the countries that still have high birthrates.
 
False! I'm in Hong Kong Right now and plenty of people are testing positive for the virus and the survival rate is about 99.8% LMAO(no one is going door to door forcing testing or closing businesses) ........This is a ONE WORLD ORDER PLAN TO CONTROL THE POPULATION of this planet. As you all know the earth could not sustain another 200 years with over 10 BILLION people on it with 99% being all Consumers. All of the governments have come together to push this to save the earth.
Without trying to sound pedantic, Hong Kong is not the same as Mainland China. It's under separate governance and economic systems.
 
Who has taken the jab yet? How are you feeling? Me be waiting at least one year from now before considering it..:)
 
Back
Top