Apart from the fact it's basic high school physics.
State changes, gas to liquid to solid, it's the same fucking fundamentals.
You can literally say that about anything. Prove to me that you need to eat to live? Have you ever starved to death, then you can't prove it. It's the same idiotic argument.
No you're missing the point.
What I'm saying is
you can't prove it, not that it can't be proved.
We can prove you need to eat to live because after a long enough period of time people always die without food. We have all of the variables we need to make that conclusion.
But in order for
you to make the conclusion that "governments aren't having an impact on peoples' vibrations on a quantum level"
you need to have a lot more information that you could possibly have at hand.
What are the most common ways that vibration patterns at a quantum level are affected?
What are all of the ways that this could occur outside of these common ways?
What are the activities being undertaken by governments around the world that may have the potential to impact the vibration patterns within the bodies of people around the world?
How many of these various activities are actually being undertaken and by which governments?
What impact are such activities which are being undertaken by these governments measurably having on the vibration patterns of people at a quantum level?
You don't know the answer to any of these questions, do you? Apart from maybe the first one if you're lucky and probably still not in any kind of comprehensive way.
All I'm saying is that you don't know anything about the thing you're claiming to know for sure - I don't either agree with or disagree with the idea that we're talking about.
In fact, this is actually a pretty pointless and ridiculous example, but it carries over into your general mechanisms for addressing decision making and your own ability to
honestly focus on objective reality and to fight against our in-built tendency to adopt the fallacy that our opinions are truth because of responses like "Jesus christ".
If you had studied science past "high school physics" then you'd get what I'm saying immediately. You can't claim that you dislike "anti-science" things and then not be able to think and act scientifically yourself. That's all.
This is actually good for you to read and hopefully it will open your mind a bit.
This is the best quote relating to what I'm trying to say:
In this case, whenever your initial response is "Jesus christ", pause and reflect on whether you actually know that thing is impossible or if it's just that most people think it's impossible. (if you actually give a shit about objective reality and your understanding of it that is).
