The vaccine is rolling out

[Preon]

Your idea of ‘intellectualism’, no one appears to want anything to do with. Why do you think that is?

I think there's a bias within the BHW community. It's certainly not true across society as a whole.

 

[theHypervisor]

I think there's a bias within the BHW community. It's certainly not true across society as a whole.

I think there’s a bias within multimedia news corporations. It’s certainly not true across society as a whole.

 

[Preon]

I think there’s a bias within multimedia news corporations. It’s certainly not true across society as a whole.

Multimedia, as in video, text, pictures, and audio??

 

[theHypervisor]

Multimedia, as in video, text, pictures, and audio??

LOL Multimedia as in print, online, broadcasts, podcasts?? Makes it easier for them to home in on their target customers I guess. You sound like you probably subscribe to a whole bunch pmsl

 

[Preon]

LOL Multimedia as in print, online, broadcasts, podcasts?? Makes it easier for them to home in on their target customers I guess. You sound like you probably subscribe to a whole bunch pmsl

I'm confused. What other media is there? Do you have news beamed directly into your head?
Being subscribed to multiple news sites is a bad thing?

 

[AngelSeo]

Your idea of ‘intellectualism’, no one appears to want anything to do with. Why do you think that is?

"My idea" is that scientists mostly know what are talking about, while anonymous internet trolls did not. Whats yours - "everyone is lying to me, all numbers are lies, those sheeps believe every statistics". I see. Yeah most definitely I prefer my kind of intellectualism.

 

[TheSoloAct]

They injected trees, concrete, trucks and people and there were very tiny side effects (on trees).

I'm highly interested in the results with concrete.

 

[SKS18]

Everything is fake in the world, the Rona, politicians, vaccine.

Hospitals are empty and apparently we've eradicated ALL other diseases except the Rona

 

[theHypervisor]

I'm confused. What other media is there? Do you have news beamed directly into your head?

Yes you are confused. Look at the context.

Being subscribed to multiple news sites is a bad thing?

Well I think it’s easy to look past the point that all news companies from their very inception were designed to herald political agendas except now they are able to embellish them throughly with thick layer of commercialism, in tabloids, or pseudo-intellectualism, like in so called broadsheets.
The latter tends to be worse because it often encourages idiots to muster up a false sense of prestige and haplessly bicker about things their favourite news channels, ultimately political agendas, throw at them without them even realising it - picking up a flashy new ‘word of the day’ tends to blind them with some false notion of superiority on itself.
I think people here smell this peculiar kind of arrogance in people like you from a mile off which is why they’re finding you a bit obnoxious.
And to answer your actual question, in your case I think it could be very dangerous.

 

[Preon]

I'm highly interested in the results with concrete.

it gained sentience and became an antivaxxer

 

[TheSoloAct]

it gained sentience and became an antivaxxer

Ah, makes a lot of sense. Does it bleed, though?

 

[Preon]

Yes you are confused. Look at the context.



Well I think it’s easy to look past the point that all news companies from their very inception were designed to herald political agendas except they are able to embellish them throughly with thick later of commercialism, in tabloids, or pseudo-intellectualism, like in so called broadsheets. The latter tends to be worse because it often encourages idiots to muster up a false sense of prestige and haplessly bicker about things there favourite news channels throw, ultimately political agenda, without them even realising, picking up a flashy new ‘word of the day’ tends to blind them with some false notion of superiority.
I think people here smell this peculiar kind of arrogance in people like you from a mile off which is why they’re finding you a bit obnoxious.
And to answer your actual question, in your case I think it could be very dangerous.

Cool. So, don't look at any news ever?

 

[statsers]

 

[Preon]

Ah, makes a lot of sense. Does it bleed, though?

Only nanobots.

 

[Preon]

View attachment 155472

I'm genuinely curious as to where you get your news from?

 

[TheSoloAct]

Only nanobots.

can the vaccine give me nanobots too?

 

[theHypervisor]

"My idea" is that scientists mostly know what are talking about, while anonymous internet trolls did not. Whats yours - "everyone is lying to me, all numbers are lies, those sheeps believe every statistics". I see. Yeah most definitely I prefer my kind of intellectualism.

And what about when there is nothing but divide and discrepancies in the scientific community about the reality of a matter and what’s in the best public interest, where decisions are based and presented not on the most objective findings but the ones which best align themselves to industrial interests, have the loudest and most prolific media presence and be able to ultimately enforce regulatory decisions. Whether someone associates themselves publicly as a scientist, or a saint or anything, they are all human beings at the end of the day which means they all have their own self-interests at stake, which usually amounts to money and power - sending their kids to private schools, fancy five star weekend breaks and so on. So wake up and smell the coffee if you think the men behind the decisions of big pharmaceutical companies represent some big altruistic entity that are here to save you from your own misery. They don’t really give two shits about you, or anyone else here I presume.

If all it take is someone to blindly throw the word ‘science’ at you regardless of context to make you sit up and listen like a circus monkey without any deeper introspection into the specifics of any matter at hand then simply LOL. I say, do the world a favour and keep your ‘intellectualism’ to yourself

 

[Preon]

can the vaccine give me nanobots too?

Only if you pay for the upgraded version. Comes with free 5g.

 

[TheSoloAct]

Comes with free 5g.

The disease or the tech?

 

[Preon]

And what about when there is nothing but divide and discrepancies in the scientific community about the reality of a matter and what’s in the best public interest, where decisions are based and presented not on the most objective findings but the ones which best align themselves to industrial interests, have the loudest and most prolific media presence and be able to ultimately enforce regulatory decisions.

If all it take is someone to blindly throw the word ‘science’ at you regardless of context to make you sit up and listen like a circus monkey without any deeper introspection into the specifics of any matter at hand then simply LOL. I say, do the world a favour and keep your ‘intellectualism’ to yourself

I'm super interested in finding out where you get your news from now, please? If you're ignoring it, it must be good.