The Vaccine & Pfitzer: Did you know?

Will you be taking the Pfitzer Vaccine?


  • Total voters
    333
Yeah, literally no idea what you mean.
38 = boy?!
I got agitated.. Peace and love :D I sure don't want anyone get hurt that is why I am saying that what I am saying.. Sure sounds otherwise when you look it from your perception - I bet! Try to understand. That's it. Just try
 
Ok, lets pretend it is a scam. To what end? What's the end goal? Why cause massive problems for economies?

Why in Australia after having no community spread are we allowed to go about our daily lives as normal?

Same for New Zealand, why are they not in on the global conspiracy?

As for the death rate, fuck the old and sick, amirite?

It always has been, and always will be about control. Whether you trust the vaccine or not doesn't really matter (I don't). We as a population are giving more control over our lives to those that lead us. Control that you don't get back barring revolution/rioting. This will affect NZ/Australia as well even if you don't see the effects yet.

A perfect example is free speech in your Australia. The people of Australia gave up that right and determined that they should let their leaders decide what constitutes as hate speech and what doesn't, and that is something you will very likely never get back unless something drastic happens.

How does this relate to covid? Well going into the future, you can expect countries to be able to shut us down at a whim on anything they determine to be harmful for us whether they are indeed harmful or not. You can expect to have to 'prove' that you are clean to enter establishments and public spaces very soon. And we still don't know what these things are going to spiral into. Giving away control is always a very slippery slope. Just ask anyone that lived in a former communist country
 
A Vaccine Passport or card that shows that you have had the vaccine in order to resume "normal life" adds a whole new level to this cluster f*ck.

Imagine owning a business and having to turn away customers if they don't have proof of vaccination.

This will take years to shake out all the problems.
 
It always has been, and always will be about control. Whether you trust the vaccine or not doesn't really matter (I don't). We as a population are giving more control over our lives to those that lead us. Control that you don't get back barring revolution/rioting. This will affect NZ/Australia as well even if you don't see the effects yet.

A perfect example is free speech in your Australia. The people of Australia gave up that right and determined that they should let their leaders decide what constitutes as hate speech and what doesn't, and that is something you will very likely never get back unless something drastic happens.

How does this relate to covid? Well going into the future, you can expect countries to be able to shut us down at a whim on anything they determine to be harmful for us whether they are indeed harmful or not. You can expect to have to 'prove' that you are clean to enter establishments and public spaces very soon. And we still don't know what these things are going to spiral into. Giving away control is always a very slippery slope. Just ask anyone that lived in a former communist country

To what end? How does the government benefit? What government? Which party?

Freedom of movement is a key component of our economy, so I don't see how anyone benefits.

I think the Australian free speech classification is fare:
On 21 June 2018, the New South Wales Parliament passed the Crimes Amendment (Publicly Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill, which inserted a new section 93Z into the Crimes Act 1900.

That section is the offence publicly threatening or inciting violence against a person or group, which carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison and/or a fine of $11,000 for individuals or $55,000 for companies.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant:

Intentionally or recklessly threatened or incited violence towards another person or group,
Did so by way of a public act, and

Did so on grounds of the other person or group's race, religious belief or affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, or HIV or AIDS status.

TBH
 
they are lying about everything to get people take this vaccine.

They who? There are 12 companies competing to sell us a vaccine. If one company lied, another would just out them and win the race.
 
When multiple doctors and scientists go against the use of a vaccine, that is a RED FLAG. Experts in their field having serious concerns with it?

This part is not logical thinking. There are thousands of doctors in the world who believe that all vaccines are the work of the devil and possess you and turn you into Satan's puppet. This particular vaccine is highly politicized, and there is a lot of money to be made in casting doubt on the vaccine, especially if someone eventually dies as a direct result of the vaccine. Being a doctor or scientist in this field does not prevent someone from being a crazy person.
 
How come does the vaccine only help protect yourself? I read and heard often that getting the vaccine also helps protect others, are they lying?
 
How come does the vaccine only help protect yourself? I read and heard often that getting the vaccine also helps protect others, are they lying?

They are twisting the truth, you can transmit it even after you have immunity, therefor it doesn't exactly help others if you get vaccinates or not. If the vulnerable have the vaccine, why would they need protecting. It's just twisting the truth, I assume there is money to be made somewhere.
 
They are twisting the truth, you can transmit it even after you have immunity, therefor it doesn't exactly help others if you get vaccinates or not. If the vulnerable have the vaccine, why would they need protecting. It's just twisting the truth, I assume there is money to be made somewhere.
Again, source for that claim? There's no evidence for that. It's been speculated, but no evidence to disprove or prove it.
Saying it's true doesn't mean it is.
 
They are twisting the truth, you can transmit it even after you have immunity, therefor it doesn't exactly help others if you get vaccinates or not. If the vulnerable have the vaccine, why would they need protecting. It's just twisting the truth, I assume there is money to be made somewhere.

Do you have a source for that claim?
 
To what end? How does the government benefit? What government? Which party?

Freedom of movement is a key component of our economy, so I don't see how anyone benefits.

I think the Australian free speech classification is fare:
On 21 June 2018, the New South Wales Parliament passed the Crimes Amendment (Publicly Threatening and Inciting Violence) Bill, which inserted a new section 93Z into the Crimes Act 1900.

That section is the offence publicly threatening or inciting violence against a person or group, which carries a maximum penalty of 3 years in prison and/or a fine of $11,000 for individuals or $55,000 for companies.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant:

Intentionally or recklessly threatened or incited violence towards another person or group,
Did so by way of a public act, and

Did so on grounds of the other person or group's race, religious belief or affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, or HIV or AIDS status.

TBH

The benefit they gain from absolute unquestioned control over our freedoms outweighs any short term drawbacks like an economic hit. Again, this goes beyond money (in my opinion of course).
 
The benefit they gain from absolute unquestioned control over our freedoms outweighs any short term drawbacks like an economic hit. Again, this goes beyond money (in my opinion of course).
Ok, but what freedoms are being lost? What controls are being put in place? How does that increase anyone's wealth?

I mean, you try and change the labor laws in France and they start throwing chairs through windows. Are you saying the french government will lock places down due to covid or health warnings if protests start in Paris because the fire department is being privatized?

I would be more worried about far right-wing rhetoric gaining footholds in American politics than I would about having to wear a mask or get a vaccine.
 
Ok, but what freedoms are being lost? What controls are being put in place? How does that increase anyone's wealth?

I mean, you try and change the labor laws in France and they start throwing chairs through windows. Are you saying the french government will lock places down due to covid or health warnings if protests start in Paris because the fire department is being privatized?

I would be more worried about far right-wing rhetoric gaining footholds in American politics than I would about having to wear a mask or get a vaccine.

This is different than labor laws because they will say it's "for our own safety" and people will have to accept it just like we accepted lockdowns.

None of us know yet exactly how this will change the world moving forward, but it's safe to assume things like mandatory vaccines/screening to take part in society will become a reality, freedom of movement will be restricted, businesses will be forced to comply. Eventually we will probably move towards a cashless society because cash is "dirty" and it's for our protection. Every action and dollar will be accounted for.

You have to think about the longterm effects with these things. Ask anybody from a former communist regime and they will tell you it started little by little, in terms of freedoms being taken away. Whether you know it or not yet, that's not a world you and your loved ones want to live in.

I suggest you watch a movie called 'demolition man' if you want to see what all these 'right wing nuts' are afraid of, and why they are desperately trying to hold onto every single human right they were born with.
 
This is where it gets complicated and argumentative.

Everybody immune system different how anyone going to no unless they try because the way it going covid could kill you anyway.

What you going to do, go every day outside with an oxygen tank to live a normal life.

Whoever you are when your time up it up no stopping it just happens.

You defo need help dude.
 
This is different than labor laws because they will say it's "for our own safety" and people will have to accept it just like we accepted lockdowns.

None of us know yet exactly how this will change the world moving forward, but it's safe to assume things like mandatory vaccines/screening to take part in society will become a reality, freedom of movement will be restricted, businesses will be forced to comply. Eventually we will probably move towards a cashless society because cash is "dirty" and it's for our protection. Every action and dollar will be accounted for.

You have to think about the longterm effects with these things. Ask anybody from a former communist regime and they will tell you it started little by little, in terms of freedoms being taken away. Whether you know it or not yet, that's not a world you and your loved ones want to live in.

I suggest you watch a movie called 'demolition man' if you want to see what all these 'right wing nuts' are afraid of, and why they are desperately trying to hold onto every single human right they were born with.
Alternatively, it could be a global pandemic which if left to run riot would kill more than WW1 and WW2 put together. The restrictions in place are meant to slow the spread and in some places stop it completely. The vaccine will allow normality to return.
Or is that theory not wild enough?!
 
Alternatively, it could be a global pandemic which if left to run riot would kill more than WW1 and WW2 put together. The restrictions in place are meant to slow the spread and in some places stop it completely. The vaccine will allow normality to return.
Or is that theory not wild enough?!

The mentality you and so many other people have is unfortunately why we're most likely headed towards the mess I described. Time will tell.
 
The mentality you and so many other people have is unfortunately why we're most likely headed towards the mess I described. Time will tell.
Well, the balance of evidence is in my favor.
 
Back
Top