Best SMM Panel for YouTube services [Cheap] ?

[salamat]

Still there aren't High Quality HR views on the market, the only one's which are real High Retention are ytbot V15, but they're PRETTY SLOW, I mean, PRETTY. SLOW. Like 75 a day...

I'll take that any day, compared to using other services that you keep on refilling - much hassle.

 

[addiso39]

Are their service is stable?

 

[salamat]

Is SMM panel legal? and If I use smm my youtube service ban or not?

Define LEGAL
It cannot cause bans, unless you are overusing it.

 

[metalgear01]

Why everyone advice to dont use SMM to dont kill channels and it seems that it can be usefull actually ? lol

 

[Rosalíaa]

smmkings is one of the best panels. I use this panel for my videos and its also good for ranking.

 

[Rosalíaa]

instant-fans is by far the best panel i have ever used

instant-fans is too expensive. smmkings sells the same service for a cheaper price.

 

[addyadamade]

Are their service is stable?

all are not stable but as far as I know manual smm is stable but their price is high.

 

[MRik]

I wonder if anyone, who has used audiencegain.net, can confirm whether the quality of views [which are far more expensive] really are much better than SMM



As I’m not sure how they really get views – through FB posts [as they claim] and yet get ‘real’ people to leave exactly 1,000 views – or give long view time. As my experience from FB posts – is people may like your FB post – but they rarely watch the video you are suggesting.



As if those views really are much safer. Is it not worth paying the extra? Rather than having to watch a lot of SMM views ‘disappear’ later on?

 

[dustfinger]

I wonder if anyone, who has used audiencegain.net, can confirm whether the quality of views [which are far more expensive] really are much better than SMM



As I’m not sure how they really get views – through FB posts [as they claim] and yet get ‘real’ people to leave exactly 1,000 views – or give long view time. As my experience from FB posts – is people may like your FB post – but they rarely watch the video you are suggesting.



As if those views really are much safer. Is it not worth paying the extra? Rather than having to watch a lot of SMM views ‘disappear’ later on?

can you send proofs

 

[Russ Thomas]

I wonder if anyone, who has used audiencegain.net, can confirm whether the quality of views [which are far more expensive] really are much better than SMM



As I’m not sure how they really get views – through FB posts [as they claim] and yet get ‘real’ people to leave exactly 1,000 views – or give long view time. As my experience from FB posts – is people may like your FB post – but they rarely watch the video you are suggesting.



As if those views really are much safer. Is it not worth paying the extra? Rather than having to watch a lot of SMM views ‘disappear’ later on?

they are using the playlist method for delivering views. when getting botted views from playlists, its much safer than getting them directly to your video. and every seller says their crap is "real" and "organic". if you need watch hours that bad then just use them. or just make good content and grind it out