The webform could be located in the yale domain and then the file would be listed in the ccam subdomain. If this is the case, then it is necessary to access a user account in yale and from there perform a thorough crawling and find the webform we want for ccam.Don't bother. They've removed everything from the index, looks like it's patched there.
NO it's not... This is pure BH. Using Google hacking and web crawling you are able to find them.You're dumb, this is of course hacking.
You're dumb, this is of course hacking.
When became using exploits hacking
Lol accessing the systems of a website in a way that bypasses the security of the site and is not the intended way for the site to be used by the owners. Yeah not hacking, of course (<<<--- this is heavy sarcasm).Can you shut the fuck up and die please?
Can you shut the fuck up and die please?

Lol accessing the systems of a website in a way that bypasses the security of the site and is not the intended way for the site to be used by the owners. Yeah not hacking, of course (<<<--- this is heavy sarcasm).
Luckily we have a few online security experts like yourselves on here.
Yes, read the definition I just posted. Even better look up the legislation on it and see what is legally defined as hacking.Exploiting a vulnerable or unsecured upload form large scale counts as hacking? That's what scriptkiddies do all day long. Are you 12 that you think that requires some skill?
Lol accessing the systems of a website in a way that bypasses the security of the site and is not the intended way for the site to be used by the owners. Yeah not hacking, of course (<<<--- this is heavy sarcasm).
Luckily we have a few online security experts like yourselves on here.
What is it too difficult to learn to read properly where you come from or what?
Jee that was hard, genius. Keep on winning at life![]()
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1392
You can't just make up definitions of what hacking is when legally you would be prosecuted for it. Simple as that. Hacking is a broad definition deliberately to stop as much of it as possible, and it mentions nothing about how hard or easy the exploit is. Don't shoot the messenger.
Code:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1392
I think you mean "those scriptkiddy techniques" but skipping past the fact you type like you've had a severe head injury, I don't hack and I think hacking is mostly a scummy way of making money because it indiscriminately targets the weakest links in society who tend to me old people that aren't very computer savvy and other normal people just trying to go about their business.Are you that salty cause that scriptkiddy technics you normally pull noone praises as the greatest hacking of all time?
Do we need account for all sites or some sites allow form submission without user account?The webform could be located in the yale domain and then the file would be listed in the ccam subdomain. If this is the case, then it is necessary to access a user account in yale and from there perform a thorough crawling and find the webform we want for ccam.
In most cases some sites allow form submission without user account. In other cases you'll have to make an account.Do we need account for all sites or some sites allow form submission without user account?
I think you mean "those scriptkiddy techniques" but skipping past the fact you type like you've had a severe head injury, I don't hack and I think hacking is mostly a scummy way of making money because it indiscriminately targets the weakest links in society who tend to me old people that aren't very computer savvy and other normal people just trying to go about their business.
If you end up in front of a judge one day I hope you quote him the "Internet Users' Glossary" from 1993 as proof that you weren't hacking and see how quick he locks you up. Then again you likely come from a place where there's more chance of you winning the lottery than ever being prosecuted for hacking.
Which one do you think matters more in a court, this document, or legislation? So why are you focusing on this like it matters?In most cases some sites allow form submission without user account. In other cases you'll have to make an account.
View attachment 141779
I think you mean "those scriptkiddy techniques" but skipping past the fact you type like you've had a severe head injury, I don't hack and I think hacking is mostly a scummy way of making money because it indiscriminately targets the weakest links in society who tend to me old people that aren't very computer savvy and other normal people just trying to go about their business.
If you end up in front of a judge one day I hope you quote him the "Internet Users' Glossary" from 1993 as proof that you weren't hacking and see how quick he locks you up. Then again you likely come from a place where there's more chance of you winning the lottery than ever being prosecuted for hacking.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technic
LOL... You made me laugh so hard. Thank you for that.Which one do you think matters more in a court, this document, or legislation? So why are you focusing on this like it matters?
It's publication, not legislation, and internet standards are just an agreed way of doing things - they mean literally nothing in the real world, and they're not even regulations, just standards.
The victim card, ok.lol so you can't argue anymore and need to low ball on the typos of a non native speaker? But please enlighten me I thought they were synonyms
Yes, that's a reason, in addition to protecting some redirect that enforces the naked URL (could be Google / YouTube / Bing).why they use bit.ly instead of their naked URL in PDF files, Is there any Google penalty they are trying to avoid?