Determine the quality of this copy

vedeus

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
912
Reaction score
461
Hi guys,
guys can you do me a favor, please?

Can you please read this short text and tell me on the scale 1-10 the quality of this article? I received it from one writer which claims to be native and I can't recognize it since I'm not.

Text: https://imgur.com/a/JQPWH3F

Also, let me know if there is anything that should be improved.

It would help me a lot guys.
Thanks
 
The start doesn't read well man. And lacks personality.

Try write a draft the way you'd speak to a friend. Shut off your mind and just type. Then take a look and see if it's more "grab you by the neck". I bet you find it is.
 
As a reader this peace didn't interest me. Firstly because the start was not very good. Then the transition to the next para was quite abrupt and sudden. Also I found a lot of repetitions of the word Limiting belief which could have been lessened by the use of another word or twisted in a way that it didn't sound repetitive.
 
I thought it was fine personally, maybe I'm just easily please ha!
 
So many literary critics in here. OP, the article is pretty good. Could very well be truly a native writer. No idea how much you paid for it, but generally it's alright.
 
The writing is okay but it could have written to flow much better and make it easier to read and more engaging.
 
The article is fine. Its not a 10/10 but its at least a 7 or 8. Its got a very formal tone to the article which might be ok for your site. if you are going for a more personal tone then it failed. if your site is purely informational and professional then its fine. Probably worth about 0.02 a word.
 
I didn't find the text very fluid, or interesting. looks little bit SEOish with the amount of times "Limiting beliefs" is repeated.

Might be informational enough for where it should be tho, it all depends on what is the goal and who is the reader.
 
It's not engaging and not interesting imo.
 
Kind of stunned that anyone is defending this.

It's content spam. Fine if you're just posting cheap stuff to a 2.0 or something but nobody is actually going to read this.

So many literary critics in here. OP, the article is pretty good. Could very well be truly a native writer. No idea how much you paid for it, but generally it's alright.

It's the copywriting section and the OP asked for a review. What else would you expect?
 
Written either by a non native speaker or a high school dropout. They've obviously never heard of: synonyms, third person singular , verb agreement, nor pronouns.

While it's about average for this forum, I would strongly urge the author to resist giving up their day job just yet. Waiting instead until they've dramatically improved their English language skills, not least of which would include a profound increase in their embarrassingly limited vocabulary.
 
too much use of the word "limiting beliefs"
 
Quite boring and formal.
Feels like a B- assignment or an exceptionally good word spinner.
Alternatively a non professional native writer or possibly an academically trained non native.
 
There are several grammatical errors:

- "every day lives" should be written as "everyday lives"
- "discuss on how..." should not contain the word "on"
- A sentence should not begin with the word "And", etc.

Probably non-native or just cheaply written content. And the target phrase is way overused.
 
I'm sure this isn't some spun shit. How much did he charge for this?
 
Looks okay to me. Not the very best, but then again all writing can be improved. Depends on the purpose you intend using it for.
 
Hi guys,
guys can you do me a favor, please?

Can you please read this short text and tell me on the scale 1-10 the quality of this article? I received it from one writer which claims to be native and I can't recognize it since I'm not.

Text: https://imgur.com/a/JQPWH3F

Also, let me know if there is anything that should be improved.

It would help me a lot guys.
Thanks
How much did you pay for the article? Either get a refund or ask the writer to fix it. So many holes, man.
 
On a quick skim, I feel like it is debatable whether or not it reads as native. Overall, if it isn’t, it is a lot better than a lot of competing non-native content, but the language could be more direct, and the grammar could use some polishing.
 
Back
Top