Secret pagerank

[Nubian Content]

The problem, dear OP, is not that people here aren't willing to hear what you want to say, or that they deem it irrelevant. The problem, as simply as it can be said, is that you say the most darnest complicated things in the most darneest complicated ways!

 

[tar729]

when you click this button, a message POPs up that something has been added to the quota somewhere. And what? Where to? I do not understand. nothing is displayed anywhere. what is a multi quota? Sorry, I really don't understand.

 

[SEOMet]

I don't get these threads

 

[tar729]

I really try to understand what you say, because I think you are on to something. But you are not the best communicator. So listen to yourself:



So stop making this about who's country is better or who is not thinking.

So if I make 2 websites this way they should start to push and pull each other up to the top over the next few months?
And then I just link the moneysite to the first of the two pages and then the money site ranks too? Because of the "thank you" bonus that the link donor gets? And in what other ways do you use the two pages to push a money site?

Thank you for your information anyways. I know explaining things can be hard sometimes and even more so if it is in another language.

I can't use your multi quotes. the selected text is not inserted. Thank you for your question. Yes, in General, this is true, but the site is raised in the issue because of the "thank you" bonus. But there are other linking strategies. For example, you can put a link from site2 on your site, so that the link also traffic passed. You have a huge field for experiments. The self-dispersing tandem consists of sites 1 and 2. Positive feedback covers their structures. They are self-sufficient so that relevance increment cycles occur. Try making a tandem of two sites first. see how they will behave in the issue. You can't do without experiments to get a feel for how it works. And over time, repeating our tests and mistakes you will come to the correct technological creation of SEO transistors.

 

[Ely]

Maybe your way of communication is a little bit arrogant, but i think your tests are great. Thanks, will try to understand them better with some russian friend

 

[tar729]

Maybe your way of communication is a little bit arrogant, but i think your tests are great. Thanks, will try to understand them better with some russian friend

thanks. I don't want to look arrogant. but I'm just really proud of my country and our Russian brains. It is a pity that this does not make my country richer.

 

[Faruqa97]

I think I am relating with what op is saying, this is a really deep and a great analysis, thanks.

 

[942-1]

I don't need to learn English...you need to learn Russian to understand what we write

Really? I've read through this twice and still have no idea what the actual f you are talking about but you won't generate many leads to your super secret underground kgb approved method with that kind of attitude.

 

[tar729]

I will be happy if you get good results, but I have to warn you. the technology is very sensitive to the accuracy of the sior of semantic cores for each of the sites. They must be complementary. That is, the ranking of both sites by different factors (which is provided by the structure) should be approximately the same. Otherwise, the first increment may not be enough to trigger switching and overtaking one site by another in serp. In this case, you need to influence the site and add relevance to it by linking to it or buying contextual advertising for the main key request. There are many nuances here and I am ready to share them with you. This is fine-tuning. Do not think that everything is very simple. This is technology. Knowing only the principles is not enough.

 

[maidzoe]

Oh here we go.. now my brain gets lost in this topic

 

[paydette]

thanks. I don't want to look arrogant. but I'm just really proud of my country and our Russian brains. It is a pity that this does not make my country richer.

Everyone should be proud of their country. Russia is beautiful. The people are beautiful and yes, you guys are really smart.

I think you're a technician. Your choice of words is very technical but I think there is some value in what youre saying. I do not know Russian but I'd love to tall to you.

 

[tar729]

to build complementary semantic cores, I use the semantic graph that my service uses in Cyrillic. you should build a semantic graph in Latin. Get frequency, completeness, and accuracy parameters. A graph is constructed using these coordinates. Then, based on the product of these coordinates, you must arrange the resulting keywords in descending order and use them to create titles in the menu and article titles. This is the only way to get precision semantics.

 

[WebPirate]

Total bullshit

 

[942-1]

Or an I over-thinking this - have you spent four pages on bizarre pseudoscientific high school chemistry analogies to basically talk about link juice? Which is well covered ground by the way, if you are.

 

[tar729]

the semantic graph is constructed from the search query that is its center. All other keywords have removal weights from the center. This structure will allow you to make the maximum semantic relevance that is closest to the reference semantic graph that Google builds. Your semantics should repeat this standard. The closer the similarity, the more relevant you will get. In the texts that you write for each key query, the emphasis on other words should correspond as closely as possible to the received shares that you have in the graph. In this case, each page will receive the highest possible rating of text relevance from Google, and the "thank you" bonuses will be the largest. The combination of these precise semantic layouts will ensure that both of your sites with different structures are equally relevant.

 

[JamieJayden]

Wish I could understand what you're saying

 

[tar729]

Really? I've read through this twice and still have no idea what the actual f you are talking about but you won't generate many leads to your super secret underground kgb approved method with that kind of attitude.

here all the juice is not in the links, but in different methods of assessing the relevance of Google different site structures. And the analogy with different types of electronic conductivities from chemistry is extremely relevant here. Because for Google, sites of different structures are also evaluated using different methods. This difference is the basis for positive feedback. This point is very important for understanding. I explained it above in the text.

 

[lewwy789]

Where do you get the semantic data from?

 

[tar729]

damn...you don't know how to build semantic graphs...I didn't take that into account. this may seem a bit complicated to you...but the graphs are three-dimensional and they are built from the statistics of search queries. Graphs represent the encrypted meaning of keywords in the structure. These structures are the same for all languages, so Google and Yandex search uses the geometric coordinate of the center of a search query and some of his entourage in the graph. Searches for the most similar matches of coordinate arrays. The matching center along with the environment indicates that this word is a translation from one language to another. This is the basis for automatic translation from one language to another. This is a geometric comparison of reference semantic graphs. All search engine rankings based on the semantic factor are based on these comparisons.

 

[tar729]

Where do you get the semantic data from?

from the query statistics, then I process it in a special way, get a graph, then I rank it in descending order.