This is a HUGE case of over-thinking.
I've never heard of anyone trying to make unique images
I shared the source too . In subsequent messagenonsense! Whoever
A
Are you kidding mate?
Still no clear evidence that make any difference . Thanks for your input .I've never known it to make a difference.
You asked for our take on it. You didnt ask for clear evidence.Still no clear evidence that make any difference . Thanks for your input .
images and to be honest i didn't notice any drop in rankings.
changes like adding a logo, 'dot' with photoshop and a unique alt tag.
This makes sense, the paid stock images might be re-used by other websites for sure.if you are really paranoid about using the free stock images then there is a paid option, but using a paid option like shutterstock does that guarantees that the images that you have used on your website will not be used by your competition.
this is trueThis is a HUGE case of over-thinking.
I've never heard of anyone trying to make unique images. All the amazon review sites are just using amazon's images, but it doesn't stop them ranking. Google isn't expecting every webpage to come up with its own completely unique images. That would be madness. Content has to be unique, not images.
Using stock images, using images from another website or any other sort of image will have NO negative effect on your SEO.