[CASE STUDIES] KGR + Parasite Hosting (Fresh Data!)

ebiz101

Power Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
739
Reaction score
174
After reading about KGR keywords on this forum, I got inspired to do some experiment regarding KGR keywords and parasite hosting. So I researched for KGR keyword based on the formula given, and blast it to web 2.0. The purpose of this experiment was to know if KGR really works and also to know which web 2.0 are easy to rank with KGR keywords.

So here's the result :

vq9GzkF


As you can see from the image, I created the web 2.0 on October 15th, 2019 and just after 1 day of blasting :

12 out of 100 web 2.0 got ranked on the first 100 of google SERP

So in conclusion :

1. KGR does works

2. Here are the web 2.0 that can give you fast results:

gapyear.com
b3.zcubes.com
werite.net
wordpress.com
slideshare.net
skyrock.com
bravesites.com
pen.io
spreaker.com
issuu.com
seekingalpha.com
doodlekit.com

Remember this experiment only use spun content and auto generated web 2.0

To scale you just need to find 10-20 KGR keywords on your niche and that will adds up to 1000 to 5000 search volume per month

Btw, this is Amazon keyword with average price > $200 and search volume 260 per month
 
Nice little experiment.

It would be nice to know how it goes in the following weeks as well.
 
Very good experiment indeed. It shows that there's still plenty of kws to go after even when people say everything is highly competitive and saturated.
 
Thanks for the list! I was just researching KGR keywords after reading a thread posted last week
 
Nice little experiment.

It would be nice to know how it goes in the following weeks as well.
thanks.. I'll let you know next week bout the progress

Very good experiment indeed. It shows that there's still plenty of kws to go after even when people say everything is highly competitive and saturated.

thanks.. yup I didn't expect to be this quick..

I love your 2.0 list :d

Thanks you

Great hopefully next week more web 2.0s are popping up on the top 100 SERP

Thanks, it appears that skyrock.com is masking external links, they look like:
href="https://www.skyrock.com/r?url=https://domain.com/keyword/...
Not sure how this will work for SEO

I think tumblr is also doing the same thing.. may be something to do with preserving the link juice

Glad to find more new web 2.0's to play with

Great you like it..

Thanks for the list! I was just researching KGR keywords after reading a thread posted last week

You're welcome.. me too I was reading about KGR this week..

Very nice experiment this will help many members who’re looking for similar results

Thanks.. hopefully it is a good start because it's showing some result.. we just need to scale them..
 
After reading about KGR keywords on this forum, I got inspired to do some experiment regarding KGR keywords and parasite hosting. So I researched for KGR keyword based on the formula given, and blast it to web 2.0. The purpose of this experiment was to know if KGR really works and also to know which web 2.0 are easy to rank with KGR keywords.

So here's the result :

vq9GzkF


As you can see from the image, I created the web 2.0 on October 15th, 2019 and just after 1 day of blasting :

12 out of 100 web 2.0 got ranked on the first 100 of google SERP

So in conclusion :

1. KGR does works

2. Here are the web 2.0 that can give you fast results:

gapyear.com
b3.zcubes.com
werite.net
wordpress.com
slideshare.net
skyrock.com
bravesites.com
pen.io
spreaker.com
issuu.com
seekingalpha.com
doodlekit.com

Remember this experiment only use spun content and auto generated web 2.0

To scale you just need to find 10-20 KGR keywords on your niche and that will adds up to 1000 to 5000 search volume per month

Btw, this is Amazon keyword with average price > $200 and search volume 260 per month
Great share!
Are you using RankerX to create those web2.0?
 
Nice share, keep us updated with results pls, what tool did you used to auto-generate web 2.0 ?
 
Sorry to come at this with a negative slant but these keywords are on pages 4,5 & 6 so basically never going to be found? Why is everyone saying this is great?
 
Sorry to come at this with a negative slant but these keywords are on pages 4,5 & 6 so basically never going to be found? Why is everyone saying this is great?
It's been only 1 day and they are top 100.

No matter if they reach page1, it is a good sign that these properties are seen better by google.
Add to that the kgr method and readable content you can get either some great parasites if they reach page1 or an awesome tier1. ;)
 
KGR criteria is supposed to rank on its own due to such low exact match competition and low search volume.
 
It's been only 1 day and they are top 100.

No matter if they reach page1, it is a good sign that these properties are seen better by google.
Add to that the kgr method and readable content you can get either some great parasites if they reach page1 or an awesome tier1. ;)
Of course they're going to be on Top 100 because allintitle probably has like 40-50 results.
But dont think that just because it got in Top100, its going to be easy to rank it on page 1.

You're going to have to spend some money on quality links and its not worth it for a parasite. Parasites are mostly used for competitive kws.

For KGR it's always better to create your own site.
 
After reading about KGR keywords on this forum, I got inspired to do some experiment regarding KGR keywords and parasite hosting. So I researched for KGR keyword based on the formula given, and blast it to web 2.0. The purpose of this experiment was to know if KGR really works and also to know which web 2.0 are easy to rank with KGR keywords.

So here's the result :

vq9GzkF


As you can see from the image, I created the web 2.0 on October 15th, 2019 and just after 1 day of blasting :

12 out of 100 web 2.0 got ranked on the first 100 of google SERP

So in conclusion :

1. KGR does works

2. Here are the web 2.0 that can give you fast results:

gapyear.com
b3.zcubes.com
werite.net
wordpress.com
slideshare.net
skyrock.com
bravesites.com
pen.io
spreaker.com
issuu.com
seekingalpha.com
doodlekit.com

Remember this experiment only use spun content and auto generated web 2.0

To scale you just need to find 10-20 KGR keywords on your niche and that will adds up to 1000 to 5000 search volume per month

Btw, this is Amazon keyword with average price > $200 and search volume 260 per month
wtf KGR means? and what did you blast it with?
 
Great share!
Are you using RankerX to create those web2.0?

Nice share, keep us updated with results pls, what tool did you used to auto-generate web 2.0 ?

which software did you use?

Yes.. i use RankerX to generate the web 2.0

Sorry to come at this with a negative slant but these keywords are on pages 4,5 & 6 so basically never going to be found? Why is everyone saying this is great?

this is just a quick test to see which web 2.0 are google friendly.. we use kgr because there's little competition

Of course they're going to be on Top 100 because allintitle probably has like 40-50 results.
But dont think that just because it got in Top100, its going to be easy to rank it on page 1.

You're going to have to spend some money on quality links and its not worth it for a parasite. Parasites are mostly used for competitive kws.

For KGR it's always better to create your own site.

Yes that's the whole concept of KGR keywords.. finding keywords that have no or less competition by looking the allintitle.. the reason we use parasite hosting because it's already have domain authority.. for this search term the #2 & #3 is also a parasite
 
Back
Top