99% of indexing services are a scam

[adultbiz]

Anyone have an account for me to test out?

I read the entire thread and it was found to be working by yourself. I was curious why it is not in the good / bad list anymore.

For info:

colinkri was found to be working 100% - all dummy urls crawled within minutes of submitting them.

 

[dividebyzero]

Really Appreciate your efforts https://www.blackhatworld.com/members/ghengis_khan.133385/. You are doing a great job helping the BHW family.

 

[13385]

I read the entire thread and it was found to be working by yourself. I was curious why it is not in the good / bad list anymore.

For info:

Sorry, already some months have passed since the start of the thread. I forgot I even tested this.

I will update the list when I am home and request that a mod change my OP with the complete list.

Thanks for mentioning this.

 

[13385]

express indexer announced they did an update last month, I have an account if you want me to submit some urls for your testing, just been through this thread and realised you checked it in August, I would be intrigued to see if this “update” made any difference, although, I do regularly index check my submissions (not spider checks) and my links are getting indexed just fine, none the less, interesting thread.

as I said, pm me with some urls and I will submit them for ya.

will pm you later, thanks!

 

[adultbiz]

Sorry, already some months have passed since the start of the thread. I forgot I even tested this.

I will update the list when I am home and request that a mod change my OP with the complete list.

Thanks for mentioning this.

You are welcome. I took the time to read the 10 pages of your thread, which was very informative, and i am glad to help. Thanks for sharing. I got rid of 1 hour indexing and switched back to speed links which i used in the past for a few years.
I also noticed one of the service was marked as ok in the past, and now it is marked as not, i assume something happened since the start of the thread.

 

[Grayback]

Can confirm bulkaddurl is still working well.

 

[Mysterious Stranger]

From which I am using nowadays - bulkaddurl works and (for most of url's, but not all) - speed links is fine also. In upcoming days I will try also corlinki (they have good opinions across the web as one of the best indexing services). So, as I supposed - those 3 should be fine for good indexing at present time. I've been using many mentioned from the list, but now only few of them are still working properly and giving good % of indexing effect.

 

[onlygrace]

speed links is 100% ghengis_khan approved. Every page i submitted received a visit from google bot after processing.

hi have you tried elitelinkindexer using your method ? I want to know whether this is still effective or not.
2 years ago, I used it and it was very effective back then

 

[Matheus Moreira]

@Cool Guy

Only who will be rich here - it's indexer service.
If you would like to become rich using SEO - at first you should learn what really matter in SEO.

Even in old Pagerank formula, you should have 1296 backlinks to receive PR4,
where others, more expirienced SEOs by just single link achieving same result.

But today Google use NEW Pagerank, where this disproportion is at least 10x - 100x higher.
Today experienced SEOs achieving by one link exactly same result what beginners in SEO by few thousands links.

For this reason, beginners can't understand, why site with small amount of links beating site with few thousands links.
They comparing that poor metrics such DA or DR, what only making beginers more confused.

And experienced SEO's don't using any indexers, because it's waste of time and money for very poor results.
That is the reality.

Cheers, Greg.

Mind telling us what is the right strategy, then? The one used by the "experienced SEOs"?

 

[Matheus Moreira]

I have been using elitelinkindexer for some time and it has always worked fine, but recently i noticed a big drop on the indexing rate. Anyone else experiencing this?

Also to the people saying that they just ping the links or something, thats wrong. What I found that elitelinkindexer do is that they create a huge page with autogenerated content and sprinkle the links on it contextually. Usually 1000 or so links per page. These pages are all registered on GSC, they then go and request indexing on GSC, which makes the crawler reach all the links. But i also found that after some time they update the page and remove the links. They do this in batches using different proprietary domains.

Now, I have to explain that I discovered all that by chance when testing if a site with a blocked robots.txt was indexed. Google was showing the gibberish anchor text that was created by the indexer with that "no information about the site" message. When i searched for the gibberish anchor text i found the page, but there were no links there (as i said they remove it after some time). Then, i tried to get the cached version of that page and voi-a-la, all the links were still there. It's just a blank page with a lot of content and the links sprinkled. Viewing the source i could confirm that they have the GSC code.

 

[UltimateBeast]

I have been using elitelinkindexer for some time and it has always worked fine, but recently i noticed a big drop on the indexing rate. Anyone else experiencing this?

Also to the people saying that they just ping the links or something, thats wrong. What I found that elitelinkindexer do is that they create a huge page with autogenerated content and sprinkle the links on it contextually. Usually 1000 or so links per page. These pages are all registered on GSC, they then go and request indexing on GSC, which makes the crawler reach all the links. But i also found that after some time they update the page and remove the links. They do this in batches using different proprietary domains.

Now, I have to explain that I discovered all that by chance when testing if a site with a blocked robots.txt was indexed. Google was showing the gibberish anchor text that was created by the indexer with that "no information about the site" message. When i searched for the gibberish anchor text i found the page, but there were no links there (as i said they remove it after some time). Then, i tried to get the cached version of that page and voi-a-la, all the links were still there. It's just a blank page with a lot of content and the links sprinkled. Viewing the source i could confirm that they have the GSC code.

Yeah, I am waiting on them from 2nd Oct. I listed the links but it's still not indexed. They don't seem to be working good. Plus this method of indexing seems a little low-quality.

 

[Matheus Moreira]

Yeah, I am waiting on them from 2nd Oct. I listed the links but it's still not indexed. They don't seem to be working good. Plus this method of indexing seems a little low-quality.

I've just finished checking a list of links from a week ago, october 4th, 264 posts, only about 50% indexed. So yeah its working but the indexing rate used to be higher. I'll probably try other methods to increase the rate.

 

[DigitalTemp]

Not 99%, I'd say in the range of 50-70% depending on web 2.0 you are trying to indexed.. I found profile with high DA tend easy to get indexed

 

[PHPInjected]

Sorry, already some months have passed since the start of the thread. I forgot I even tested this.

I will update the list when I am home and request that a mod change my OP with the complete list.

Thanks for mentioning this.

Also, if you have an updated list of the indexing services you have personally tested, I would be glad to add the working indexing services to my thread that is stickied in the BH SEO section.

All of BHW is appreciating you testing these indexing methods out.

 

[ekapek]

Yeah, I am waiting on them from 2nd Oct. I listed the links but it's still not indexed. They don't seem to be working good.

Hello, we have noticed that you are testing our system with 3 urls which you have uploaded. And saying that is not working. 3 urls is too small to test any system. Also 1 of the 3 urls is indexed at 5.10 - there is cached version. Another 2 urls are Web 2.0s with small text on it which is also on another few domains already indexed. Such content doesn't bring any value for Google and even if it will be indexed it will drop fast. Copied content on Web 2.0 is the easiest think which Google can mark as not valuable. Indexing ratio depends on many details and probably is the easiest thing to measure on indexing system, but generally the results should be visible in rankings at SERP. Good merge of linking, content, indexing, strategy and another factors decide who is ranking better.

 

[UltimateBeast]

Hello, we have noticed that you are testing our system with 3 urls which you have uploaded. And saying that is not working. 3 urls is too small to test any system. Also 1 of the 3 urls is indexed at 5.10 - there is cached version. Another 2 urls are Web 2.0s with small text on it which is also on another few domains already indexed. Such content doesn't bring any value for Google and even if it will be indexed it will drop fast. Copied content on Web 2.0 is the easiest think which Google can mark as not valuable. Indexing ratio depends on many details and probably is the easiest thing to measure on indexing system, but generally the results should be visible in rankings at SERP. Good merge of linking, content, indexing, strategy and another factors decide who is ranking better.

I gave the same type of links to a guy doing a giveaway here and He indexed it within 4-5 hours. Many members were suggesting your indexer so I decided to try it. I don't have any problems with these links getting deindexed later. I just wanted them to be indexed, as I was testing your indexer. And yeah, I know 3 URLs could be a problem for your servers, but if it doesn't get indexed even after 1 week, that is also not good then.
Also, I just checked, none of the links seems to be indexed till now. I am using the 'site:yourwebsite.com' to check.

Another 2 urls are Web 2.0s with small text on it which is also on another few domains already indexed. Such content doesn't bring any value for Google and even if it will be indexed it will drop fast. Copied content on Web 2.0 is the easiest think which Google can mark as not valuable.

What I found that elitelinkindexer do is that they create a huge page with autogenerated content and sprinkle the links on it contextually. Usually 1000 or so links per page. These pages are all registered on GSC, they then go and request indexing on GSC, which makes the crawler reach all the links. But i also found that after some time they update the page and remove the links. They do this in batches using different proprietary domains.

Now, I have to explain that I discovered all that by chance when testing if a site with a blocked robots.txt was indexed. Google was showing the gibberish anchor text that was created by the indexer with that "no information about the site" message. When i searched for the gibberish anchor text i found the page, but there were no links there (as i said they remove it after some time). Then, i tried to get the cached version of that page and voi-a-la, all the links were still there. It's just a blank page with a lot of content and the links sprinkled. Viewing the source i could confirm that they have the GSC code.

 

[UltimateBeast]

Also, I just checked, none of the links seems to be indexed till now. I am using the 'site:yourwebsite.com' to check.

My bad guys, the stated link has been indexed. I think it was some browser issue from my side or something. I will update when all the links get indexed.

 

[Matheus Moreira]

@ekapek Care to give me some advice/solve some doubts about black hat link building on PM? You seem to have experience with black hat since you are the owner of the indexer.

Thanks in advance.

 

[13385]

Update :

Working : (Google-bot visited all pages submitted)
bulkaddurl
eliteindexing
speedlinks
Index Inject
gindex.me
LARINDEX
web20indexer
colinkri

Not working (No visits from google-bot)
onehourindexing.co
linklicious.co
Indexification
Linkcentaur
instantlinkindexer
expressindexer.solutions
backlinksindexer.com
linkprocessor
Index Nuke

Apology to Colrinki for forgetting to update the list with them!

 

[GregFromMoonsy]

All about backlinks indexers:



Cheers, Greg.