Content from Web Archive is bad?

[dkv023]

I researched on the internet but heard many things about this. But when I tried according to my niche, maximum time, I was unable to crawl data from web scrapping. May be I don't even know how to do that

Yes, this is a problem. Because everybody put in a search box 1-2 word phrase in web.archive.org. I think it's better to put long tail keywords. But web.archive.org shows not related results often.

 

[TechEinstien]

It is pretty good just do some edits before posting it. I use expired content from time to time.

 

[MisterF]

If he is a native speaker I mean what a point to use content from Archive if he can write semself.

Speed and cost.

 

[BrandingCat]

I am ranking pretty well if pass plagiarism checker.

 

[Stitches and Burns]

Wouldn't that be plagiarism? I mean they were indexed by Google in the past.

 

[Cshark]

I don't think it's a good idea to use this kind of content in your money-site, primarily because it's available to everyone. That's my 2 cents.

 

[dkv023]

I don't think it's a good idea to use this kind of content in your money-site, primarily because it's available to everyone. That's my 2 cents.

It's difficult to find it. So I'm not sure is it available for everyone. But it is only one alternative for non speakers. Maybe still one - transcription from audio (youtube) to text.

 

[dkv023]

Does anybody knew how to find web archived content by keywords?

 

[Kurumi]

last year i tried to post 10 expired article on my new/fresh domain, a month later i remove the content and move on

Why? Is it bad for rank or something?

 

[Purush]

for that mate, any content with our own re-writing will work.