Content from Web Archive is bad?

[dkv023]

Web archive's content is bad for articles? It is unique and free. Maybe it is good for using in evergreen niches? Or maybe there are 90% spinned content in web.archive.org and it's worthless?

 

[Geasy]

It really depends on the site. You might find good sites with great content, however, after some-time you'll have duplicate content on your site as other people will find it.

Been there, done that.

 

[dkv023]

It really depends on the site. You might find good sites with great content, however, after some-time you'll have duplicate content on your site as other people will find it.

Been there, done that.

What if I choose website which had gone few years? It was alive in 2012-2013. I don't think owner will be remember his content.

 

[FatBee]

Atm, ranking #1 for every single main keyword. So i guess for now its fine.

 

[spectrejoe]

Atm, ranking #1 for every single main keyword. So i guess for now its fine.

using expired content?

 

[FatBee]

using expired content?

Well.. thats what we talk about here... any we?

 

[dkv023]

Well.. thats what we talk about here... any we?

I think it is because of non-competitive niche.
Interesting how to find content in Webarchive by using keywords?

 

[FatBee]

I think it is because of non-competitive niche.
Interesting how to find content in Webarchive by using keywords?

Pretty hard comp. tho (niche wise) keywords are medium.

i have my own eay of finding this (manual work) and i would like to keep it for as of now.

 

[Deleted member 657006]

why it bad ?

with a good spinner it converts

 

[dkv023]

Pretty hard comp. tho (niche wise) keywords are medium.

i have my own eay of finding this (manual work) and i would like to keep it for as of now.

How are you dealing with aging. These webarchive's articles has been written a few years ago.

 

[dkv023]

why it bad ?

with a good spinner it converts

spinner makes article not readable.

 

[FatBee]

How are you dealing with aging. These webarchive's articles has been written a few years ago.

Im in a niche that even info from 1990 is relevant, some polishing and you are good to go. The day i opened the website it took me 3 hrs to find and edit 25 articles (90.000 words total FREE CONTENT!)

 

[dkv023]

Im in a niche that even info from 1990 is relevant, some polishing and you are good to go. The day i opened the website it took me 3 hrs to find and edit 25 articles (90.000 words total FREE CONTENT!)

How do you know if content is good as native and not spinned?

 

[spectrejoe]

How do you know if content is good as native and not spinned?

he reads it

 

[dkv023]

he reads it

If he is a native speaker I mean what a point to use content from Archive if he can write semself.

 

[HustleTong]

Content from expired domain is reusable. But as you know, it's open for everyone & all you can do is to test your luck.

 

[dkv023]

Content from expired domain is reusable. But as you know, it's open for everyone & all you can do is to test your luck.

It's not exactly from expired domain. It's from Archive.

 

[dkv023]

Can I use content from Archive.org I see there are a lot of books and text which are not duplicated.

 

[Rains]

last year i tried to post 10 expired article on my new/fresh domain, a month later i remove the content and move on

 

[Shekh Lab]

I researched on the internet but heard many things about this. But when I tried according to my niche, maximum time, I was unable to crawl data from web scrapping. May be I don't even know how to do that