Backlinks indexing on Bing

[Mohit66314]

I know few of the service available which can index your backlinks on google and i tired them to index my backlinks but they only index on google search.
How can i index backlinks on bing search.

 

[Steph Curry Jr.]

I thought they indexed for all.

 

[BHSEONewb]

The easiest way is to create an account on Bing's version of the Webmaster Console and submit a sitemap. I've had no issues indexing on Bing and they're SEO is much simpler than Google's and they supply the data to Yahoo search as well as DuckDuckGo and a few others, from what I've read.

 

[Myst3ry]

The easiest way is to create an account on Bing's version of the Webmaster Console and submit a sitemap. I've had no issues indexing on Bing and they're SEO is much simpler than Google's and they supply the data to Yahoo search as well as DuckDuckGo and a few others, from what I've read.

He is talking about backlinks, not site posts/pages.

 

[BHSEONewb]

He is talking about backlinks, not site posts/pages.

You sir, are 100% correct. I need much more coffee...

If the page is crawled by the search engines (which it should be unless blocked for some reason), then they should register on all engines... eventually. Here's how I get backlinks to register on Google quickly, I have a page of links to the backlinks and I submit it to Google webmaster console and Bing should crawl the page as well via my SEO plugin. Works very well for me with Google. Honestly, haven't paid much attention to Bing (though I should) so I don't know if those links were indexed for sure (I tested with the site: command on Google, never thought to try Bing).

Basically how it works is if I have a link on a profile page for a made-up site "Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb", then I would on my links page have a link pointing to Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb. In my experience, it usually indexed within a week and about 85% of my links indexed. I assume that Google crawled the rest and rejected them for indexing, since they were before and mixed in with ones that did get indexed.

 

[Mr Positive]

You can point Web 2.0 at those bing backlinks and blast tier 2 links on those Web 2.0 that should be more than enough to index your backlinks on bing.

 

[Myst3ry]

You sir, are 100% correct. I need much more coffee...

If the page is crawled by the search engines (which it should be unless blocked for some reason), then they should register on all engines... eventually. Here's how I get backlinks to register on Google quickly, I have a page of links to the backlinks and I submit it to Google webmaster console and Bing should crawl the page as well via my SEO plugin. Works very well for me with Google. Honestly, haven't paid much attention to Bing (though I should) so I don't know if those links were indexed for sure (I tested with the site: command on Google, never thought to try Bing).

Basically how it works is if I have a link on a profile page for a made-up site "Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb", then I would on my links page have a link pointing to Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb. In my experience, it usually indexed within a week and about 85% of my links indexed. I assume that Google crawled the rest and rejected them for indexing, since they were before and mixed in with ones that did get indexed.

That's a footprint. You may regret doing that later. Not that good advice to give.

 

[BHSEONewb]

That's a footprint. You may regret doing that later. Not that good advice to give.

Thanks for the advice Myst3ry. It's a similar strategy to what BassTrackerBoats was talking about where he used a URL shortener on his site for the same purpose, so that mysite.com/234328sw would redirect to Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb Would that provide less of a footprint? Granted, I'm not talking about PBN links or anything like that. Just links from sites like sourceforge and other high DA mainstream sites and niche specific sites.

Thanks again, constantly learning.

 

[Myst3ry]

Thanks for the advice Myst3ry. It's a similar strategy to what BassTrackerBoats was talking about where he used a URL shortener on his site for the same purpose, so that mysite.com/234328sw would redirect to Backlinks-R-Us.org/BHSEONewb Would that provide less of a footprint? Granted, I'm not talking about PBN links or anything like that. Just links from sites like sourceforge and other high DA mainstream sites and niche specific sites.

Thanks again, constantly learning.

Yes, you are not talking about PBN but how do you know how the OP will use that? If you are not talking about PBN or anything like that you should mention that. You was talking generally.

Also, that strategy was to be done on another domain that has no correlation with the main domain which won't be seen as a footprint. Unfortunately, that's not working anymore. I tried to index a page that redirects manually in the Inspection tool and I got an error. It can't be indexed because of the redirection.

Your strategy is dangerous, you are placing the backlinks on your website. Every manual link creation is against Google's guidelines, remember?

 

[Mohit66314]

You can point Web 2.0 at those bing backlinks and blast tier 2 links on those Web 2.0 that should be more than enough to index your backlinks on bing.

Thanks for the suggestion.
Can you explain more by an example

 

[shags38]

Try this ... links to money site - place the url to those links on a resources page on another website or web2.0 - register that other website or web2.0 in Bing Webmaster Tools - add that resources page to 'add urls' in Bing - Bing will crawl it hence crawling the urls to the links to your money site - you can ask for re-crawl of that resources page periodically. Maybe even a number of 'other sites' and spread the url links around. The same works in Google of course.

 

[BHSEONewb]

Yes, you are not talking about PBN but how do you know how the OP will use that? If you are not talking about PBN or anything like that you should mention that. You was talking generally.

Also, that strategy was to be done on another domain that has no correlation with the main domain which won't be seen as a footprint. Unfortunately, that's not working anymore. I tried to index a page that redirects manually in the Inspection tool and I got an error. It can't be indexed because of the redirection.

Your strategy is dangerous, you are placing the backlinks on your website. Every manual link creation is against Google's guidelines, remember?

Very good points. I'll cease discussing/recommending the process and thanks for the info on the redirects not working.

It's an interesting thing about manual links being a violation, especially in my industry (US residential real estate) where there are so many legitimate manual links from high (80/90+) DA sites (zillow, realtor dot com, company pages, professional directories, LinkedIn type sites, etc.). Many industry related sites to list your properties and create a profile, all having to be done manually, and they all have spots to put your company page and pass link juice.

I figured I only indexed about 20-30 links in this manner (approx 0.01% of my total link profile) during a recent competitive research & link building spree over a couple months for a site that's older than Google. I won't do the tactic any more, but also won't loose any sleep over having done it.

Thanks for your insight and knowledge, I truly do appreciate it!

 

[somewebmaster]

Try this ... links to money site - place the url to those links on a resources page on another website or web2.0 - register that other website or web2.0 in Bing Webmaster Tools - add that resources page to 'add urls' in Bing - Bing will crawl it hence crawling the urls to the links to your money site - you can ask for re-crawl of that resources page periodically. Maybe even a number of 'other sites' and spread the url links around. The same works in Google of course.

Have anyone tried this, ever? Or at least heard that someone else did it? It looks like a desperate solution but might work for Bing, but looks dangerous for Google.

 

[shags38]

Have anyone tried this, ever? Or at least heard that someone else did it? It looks like a desperate solution but might work for Bing, but looks dangerous for Google.

Yes I do it and it works, I use this to index links to my eCommerce sites, hasn't caused any issues (as yet anyway, never any guarantees, right) - not sure what you mean [but looks dangerous for Google] or [looks like a desperate solution] ... how is it different to a PBN in principal? (without being a network as such) - web2.0, like a blogger.com blog - resources page - put your links on it - add that blog to Bing Webmaster Tools (add account) - then submit sitemap etc - also use submit url specifically for the resources page (direct link to the blog/resources_page) - Bing will find and index the page reasonably quickly, (so will Google eventually). I use a number of different blogs with resources pages to spread the links around ..... once a link is indexed I go to the particular blog resource page and delete the link, it has done its job - this way the resources page doesn't appear spammy with a build up of essentially now useless links.

Slip a link into a Tumbler, Medium, Plurk etc or any other post that will likely get crawled ... "I recently joined this great site (XYZdotcom/my_profile_page) which will be an advantage to my website building (or to my business, or my education, or my ...) - it is a great resource for (whatever XYZdotcom actually does - so it makes sense) ...."

 

[Proxy Gurus]

I think Bing is a different ballgame - those instant link indexing service does magic on Google, but it does not index the same on Bing, as the mechanics appear to be different -much slower and seems like they have lesser indexed links(pages) on their DB as compared to Google lol. But what I find to be most effective are contextual links - a whole lot of them. Use a link shortener to shorten your target URL, then use these shortened links and build a whole lot of contextual links to them - When enough is build, you get your page indexed on Bing in under 24 hours.

 

[Mohit66314]

Yes I do it and it works, I use this to index links to my eCommerce sites, hasn't caused any issues (as yet anyway, never any guarantees, right) - not sure what you mean [but looks dangerous for Google] or [looks like a desperate solution] ... how is it different to a PBN in principal? (without being a network as such) - web2.0, like a blogger.com blog - resources page - put your links on it - add that blog to Bing Webmaster Tools (add account) - then submit sitemap etc - also use submit url specifically for the resources page (direct link to the blog/resources_page) - Bing will find and index the page reasonably quickly, (so will Google eventually). I use a number of different blogs with resources pages to spread the links around ..... once a link is indexed I go to the particular blog resource page and delete the link, it has done its job - this way the resources page doesn't appear spammy with a build up of essentially now useless links.

Slip a link into a Tumbler, Medium, Plurk etc or any other post that will likely get crawled ... "I recently joined this great site (XYZdotcom/my_profile_page) which will be an advantage to my website building (or to my business, or my education, or my ...) - it is a great resource for (whatever XYZdotcom actually does - so it makes sense) ...."

Bing ask for ownership verification (by putting the xml code into the site or uploading xml file).
How do you verify the ownership verification of these blogs or medium or tumbler post ?

 

[scotlandpackage]

Which tool can index my backlink within 1 minute before it gets removed?

 

[shimuke]

Bing usually finds links faster on its own if the pages are crawlable. You can also submit them through Bing Webmaster Tools or use IndexNow.