MUTHAF*CKIN KEYWORD Research

[jeffro89]

Hello Gentleman, i bring to you a subject we all know about and cherish close to our money making endeavors.

Muthafuckin KEYWORD REASEARCH​

So some of us marketers, are impatient, that's why we focus on the paid traffic. So SEO has always been at the bottom of the pile. Only recently did the "No Money, No Ads" statement come into play. So i dived back into SEO with a vengeance, treating the properties as long terms projects so I'm in this for the long haul.

Ive read every single SEO guide on BHW, plus all of the "How to do keyword research properly" + "How not to do keyword research" + all the other amazing thorough guides.
One things that i know is fucking up the system is my shitty keyword research skills.

I am still relying on tools to let me know if a keyword is easy to rank or not. Which is shit as they all give different damn difficulty ratings. Check this shit out...

The keyword we shall be discussing today is - (why men cheat)​

KWfinder Stats​

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOZ stats (PS: I know MOZ is questionable, but meh)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Semrush Stats

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And good old Mr HEMROID FEATURES and his shitty tool.

Like which one do you choose to believe ? Three out of the 4 tools say its easy to rank.
I know the core way of doing this will be by running my own tests, but yet again, i am to impatient to be running SEO tests let alone doing SEO. Before some dinosaur comes out and says "well then dont do SEO" To you sir SHHH ya mouth. I am just impatient not hating it.
But one of these damn tools should be worth the money they charge, apart from Ubersuggest of course.​

For all you "I just look at SERP's top 10 and decide on the difficulty that way"
Yes that's fine, but how did you get there FAM?

Help a Noob out guys, i know many of you have came to the realization that these tools push a lot of fluff, but do they ?​

 

[blackbeans]

They seem to be all over the place

 

[Deleted member 906759]

Hey Bud - Just use these tools as a gauge. SEMrush is the one I've been using for 3 years. It seems to be the lesser of other evils.

 

[IG Professor]

Sem rush & ahrefs will do the job

 

[Tipitip]

Google Keyword Planner?

 

[Geasy]

None of them really. Even Ahrefs that I use for kw research doesn't give accurate data if the keyword is easy or hard to rank (even they say themselves). What you should do is do your own judgment.

For example, Ahrefs measures kw difficulty by the number of backlinks the domains have, but that doesn't mean it is easy to rank since all the sites there can have 0 backlinks but all of them being authority. So at Ahrefs I find the most accurate being AR (Ahrefs Rank). The higher that is, the easier is to rank since domains are fairly new. Though that can be manipulated since it can't crawl PBNs.

 

[Mr Positive]

When in doubt use HAF I'm not a expert on kw hence I either choose HAF or existing services. Benefits peace of mind, give them the specifications and get my desired results.

 

[mickyfu]

Well done. You have just proved you know absolutely fuck all about keyword research.

For all you "I just look at SERP's top 10 and decide on the difficulty that way"
Yes that's fine, but how did you get there FAM?

Well simpleton. (I'm sorry, I'd like to call you a simpleton in the most inoffensive way)

One very fucking big sign is looking at the "intitle:yourfuckingkeyword" Google operator. This tells you how many websites target "Your keyword" in their meta title. Let me give you the basics in keyword research. Little results for "intitle:"yourfuckingkeyword" along with (say Ahrefs 0 competition) = probably fucking easy.

I suggest you look up basic keyword research. I'm more than happy to help you with it.

 

[phoenix9]

Just use ahrefs and your brain to analyze top 10 result is enough.

All tools you mention is crap or not good enough.

 

[kn1ves]

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/g...ompetition-without-spending-a-dollar.1074066/

Give this a read.

 

[jeffro89]

Well done. You have just proved you know absolutely fuck all about keyword research.



Well simpleton. (I'm sorry, I'd like to call you a simpleton in the most inoffensive way)

One very fucking big sign is looking at the "intitle:yourfuckingkeyword" Google operator. This tells you how many websites target "Your keyword" in their meta title. Let me give you the basics in keyword research. Little results for "intitle:"yourfuckingkeyword" along with (say Ahrefs 0 competition) = probably fucking easy.

I suggest you look up basic keyword research. I'm more than happy to help you with it.

LMAO simpleton is grateful for the advice @mickyfu. Think i'll get a few of those ahrefs accounts that you can renew every seven days and focus on results i get from there, plus also start some test with parasites. Cuts down the wait time for results.

 

[Billy Batts]

Well this is how I usually do it. I rip KW's from my competitors in Ahrefs. Then I filter them on searches and difficulty I like to work with. Export the suckers and then Import them in KWfinder, I'll check the trend and filter again on the searches and difficulties I want. Ofc it's never 100% accurate but works fine for me this way.

Remember, SEO is not all about KW's and their difficulty , besides I generate most of my traffic through marketing and not SEO.

 

[BrandingCat]

Nothing can even compare with Ahrefs power technology and manual spy first 10 picks.

 

[Aty]

Men don't cheat.

 

[NO-CLUE-SEO]

And good old Mr HEMROID FEATURES and his shitty tool.

Lol. So funny.

 

[BradyX]

I go for Ahrefs. But I think KW Finder gives the best data in terms of monthly searches.

 

[Divingdeep]

Yeah , Ahrefs is showing too little for easy keywords , I mean they give 0 , and kwfinder gives 26-27 , semrudh 60 ... So much gap