Dialgon
Regular Member
- Aug 3, 2018
- 301
- 27
We get the following conclusions. We don't know anything safe messenger. It `s so sad.My mistake.
You're right.
But still operator can read users messages.
That's for sure.
We get the following conclusions. We don't know anything safe messenger. It `s so sad.My mistake.
You're right.
But still operator can read users messages.
That's for sure.
Yo guys!
I was thinking about e-mail services and if they're private enough.. I have to use email a lot in my work and I think it's not so safe. Maybe there are blockchain based emails (as it is very popular these days) or decentralized ones? As I don't want anyone to have an access to my correspondence.
What email service do you use on the whole? I want to collect all pros and cons in order to choose the best service for me.
We get the following conclusions. We don't know anything safe messenger. It `s so sad.
User interface plays a big role. It will not become popular in this case.As I already told you Adamant is a good one for all the security reasons except its UI.
User interface plays a big role. It will not become popular in this case.
Protonmail is one of the securer atm.Yo guys!
I was thinking about e-mail services and if they're private enough.. I have to use email a lot in my work and I think it's not so safe. Maybe there are blockchain based emails (as it is very popular these days) or decentralized ones? As I don't want anyone to have an access to my correspondence.
What email service do you use on the whole? I want to collect all pros and cons in order to choose the best service for me.
We can hope. Developers have their own opinion. They may not think about the user interface at all. We don't know the purpose of the developers.I agree with you, that's why I suppose that developers will work it out.
We can hope. Developers have their own opinion. They may not think about the user interface at all. We don't know the purpose of the developers.
Why did they make a crappy user interface? Such a question should have been resolved at the level of service testing. Maybe they don't care, right?I guess their purpose is to have access to users data.
Do you believe in that?
Why did they make a crappy user interface? Such a question should have been resolved at the level of service testing. Maybe they don't care, right?
He doesn't become popular. I'm sorry. We should look for something else.I really don't know what was the goal to make so, but I think if it could be much popular, it would not have such issues.
He doesn't become popular. I'm sorry. We should look for something else.
I agree with you. How can we use it if it doesn't become popular? I don't want to talk to myself)I don't agree.
Popularity doesn't make any product or service great for usage.
Take a look at Facebook.
It's popular but has no any privacy.
I think people just afraid of trying new and unknown.
What means of security do they have? I mean how can I be sure in it?Protonmail is one of the securer atm.
100% scanned, who have doubts about that just read about your email server provider features, 100% of them have antispam filters, what they actually do? Watching each your mail. Providers like gmail, yahoo, and others uses your information extracted from each letter to show you relevant ads. It's their business. When you pay nothing for the service, it means that product now is you.Hmmm don't think there's such a thing as a safe email. Pretty sure all of them are reading/scanning your mails.
Best thing would be to run your own mail server like what Hillary did. lol