ScreamingMidget
Elite Member
- Mar 17, 2013
- 2,493
- 590
Let's say you know of a very famous person and you know the .net extension is available, do they still rank well and is there still a resale value?
In my online reputation management experiences, I've had many occasions where I've purchased the .com, .net, and .org of someone's name. I've then populated these sites with content and promoted them simultaneously. So this has made for a solid case study into how performance of TLDs affects ranking.
From what I have seen, there are very few instances were one specific TLD of the three above did better than the others.
Now I will say that I have stopped purchasing .info, .co, and .us TLDs for clients, and have instead started buying firstname-lastname .com, .org and .net (with a hyphen), as they have ranked better for me.
I'll tag in @BHopkins to see if he's noticed anything similar.
I would rate them on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most likely to rank.
.com - 10
.net - 4
.org - 4
everything else - 1
I always buy the .com, .net, and .org if the EMD's are available and I don't buy anything else unless the client specifically cares about that TLD.
but one thing that I have learned is: .com beats everything.
True that, but I was talking about the global market. But you're right, a powerful .de in germany could beat the equal .comDepending on the country you live in, a local .com extension can be more/equally powerful as a normal .com
True that, but I was talking about the global market. But you're right, a powerful .de in germany could beat the equal .com
Absolutely trueOn a global level, yes, the .com would be in theory the most powerful, but it all depends on the seo work you have done on that domain. I have seen .net and .org outrank .com on local and global scale.
I always advice friends buying the local .com and regular .com for their business just to be sure (and even the .net and .org if they have the money). Even if they don't do business globally it's always good to protect your investment!