Fresh site PA/DA/MOZ

[Degen]

So I started a fresh WP news blog(3days old) on a domain which is 1.5y old (first owner)
The current scores are :

PA : 9
DA : 6
MOZ: 0.8

IS this decent?
As I never worked with PA/DA/MOZ my traffic mostly came from social media so was never worried about this type of stuff .

 

[set23]

any backlinks in your website?

 

[Degen]

any backlinks in your website?

I have 3 according to the report, but I can't see from where. The social links I have doesn't count as they're nofollow

 

[set23]

I have 3 according to the report, but I can't see from where. The social links I have doesn't count as they're nofollow

why can't you see where come they from?

 

[Degen]

because of the plain sitename it gets used often.. 2 of them are from blogs( about the same score as mine, never heard of them... and the third is from an guest post on a kindle writers page)

 

[safeSEOboost]

DA 6 and 3 backlinks is, for lack of better words, very weak.
As any site with any power has DA 25+ RD 100+, and powerful sites are DA 40+ RD 500+, on a scale of things, this gives you an idea that this domain as such will not get you very far.

 

[Nargil]

Tip: If you have never worked with Moz metrics, then do not even start to do so. As mentioned above, the domain is very weak for a money site, almost as if you were starting fresh, but still risking a possibility of domain being toxic or simply impossible to rank.

 

[handsomesol]

your DA is very very low
you need to improve that

 

[Chris.Roark]

They are alright as a start (better than 0 for new domains).

However, you need to work on it and increase it.

 

[ProxiesHTTP]

I think a decent or semi-powerful site would have approximately DA/PA of 35+ and a TF>15-20+. An extremely good site would have in the region of DA/PA>60 and TF>35+
However, DA/PA can be manipulated by churning in pure spam to your site, but the max that I could achieve through spam would be a DA/PA of 40+.
And with DA/PA+TF being considered as the metrics, that would allow better vetting in that aspect in terms of quality.