Real Madrid vs Juventus

[SH-M]

It's the final argument of the losers. First they say "it was not a penalty", then they fall back to "ok, it was but the referee should not have given it". Why? Ehh, because my hurt feelings.

Nahhh man. I can guarantee that anyone having played football at least semi-professionally and having watched it on the TV at least since the 90s will tell you that what happened on Wednesday night was a pure robbery! Such penalties are not given 9/10, and why it should happen on 90+3 after being 0-3 down in a Champions League quarters. Context matters a lot believe it or not.

Moreover, I'm not a fan of Juventus, but this is not the first time that Real Madrid has been favored by certain refs, it happened many times before in equally (if not more) important matches. It is not even a coincidence anymore!

 

[SH-M]

the actual problem is that on 93th minute the whole defense of Juve failed ))

and no one cares about it, but that's the main reason of loss



And also

what do you think about Munich V Real?

It would be great matches <3

Florentino Perez (the one who is purchasing the Champions League trophies for Real Madrid) said that I want Bayern in the semis BEFORE the second leg matches..... so he knew that Bayern (a tight tie vs. Sevilla) and Real Madrid (93rd minute scandal) will both go through. Coincidence much? Only if you're silly enough to believe it!

 

[Endri]

Nahhh man. I can guarantee that anyone having played football at least semi-professionally and having watched it on the TV at least since the 90s will tell you that what happened on Wednesday night was a pure robbery! Such penalties are not given 9/10, and why it should happen on 90+3 after being 0-3 down in a Champions League quarters. Context matters a lot believe it or not.

Moreover, I'm not a fan of Juventus, but this is not the first time that Real Madrid has been favored by certain refs, it happened many times before in equally (if not more) important matches. It is not even a coincidence anymore!

According to this logic there should be no penalties in 90+ minutes right cause it would be unfair

 

[rimvy]

Florentino Perez (the one who is purchasing the Champions League trophies for Real Madrid) said that I want Bayern in the semis BEFORE the second leg matches..... so he knew that Bayern (a tight tie vs. Sevilla) and Real Madrid (93rd minute scandal) will both go through. Coincidence much? Only if you're silly enough to believe it!

What more? Maybe earth is flat?

 

[Ernestismyname]

Don't be jealous mate. Your view don't matters for anyone. It was penalty. Don't act like bullshit.

I never said my viewed mattered. I wondered what other people thought so stop trying to act smart.

 

[SH-M]

Touching the ball first doesn't allow you to whatever you want afterwards lol, not only that but you cant raise your leg above your hip height when close to an opponent or its an infraction (generally not worthy of penalty obviously but that's 3 infractions already lol)

You clearly have not watched football long enough to fully grasp its rules. Learn more about this beautiful sport and then come up with such ridiculous comments.

The moment that I've read that 'hip height' thing I understood that I'm losing my precious time arguing with an immature football fan, but oh well. Since we're at it, that 'above hip height' foot raising thing is technically an indirect foul, and it is given inside the box as well, but it is not a penalty! Indirect fouls do not equal penalties. You're proving yourself wrong as now it turns out it was an indirect foul in the box. Learn before commenting!

 

[SH-M]

What more? Maybe earth is flat?

Facts for the blind and biased fans.

 

[Endri]

You clearly have not watched football long enough to fully grasp its rules. Learn more about this beautiful sport and then come up with such ridiculous comments.

The moment that I've read that 'hip height' thing I understood that I'm losing my precious time arguing with an immature football fan, but oh well. Since we're at it, that 'above hip height' foot raising thing is technically an indirect foul, and it is given inside the box as well, but it is not a penalty! Indirect fouls do not equal penalties. You're proving yourself wrong as now it turns out it was an indirect foul in the box. Learn before commenting!

Where did you see benatia touch the ball ?

 

[SH-M]

Where did you see benatia touch the ball ?

 

[Clive56]

Florentino Perez (the one who is purchasing the Champions League trophies for Real Madrid) said that I want Bayern in the semis BEFORE the second leg matches..... so he knew that Bayern (a tight tie vs. Sevilla) and Real Madrid (93rd minute scandal) will both go through. Coincidence much? Only if you're silly enough to believe it!

So Perez can't make a wish anymore?

What about Roma selling Roma v Liverpool tickets long before the draw?

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/945517/Champions-League-draw-shock-Liverpool-fans-awkward-Roma-mistake

Coincidence much?!

 

[Endri]

And what that hand behind vasques back is doing , maybe pushing a little

 

[Ernestismyname]

And what that hand behind vasques back is doing , maybe pushing a little

Exactly! A little! Nothing worth a damn penalty.

 

[SH-M]

So Perez can't make a wish anymore?

What about Roma selling Roma v Liverpool tickets long before the draw?

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...raw-shock-Liverpool-fans-awkward-Roma-mistake

Coincidence much?!

I won't deny that UEFA is slowly becoming a criminal organization, but I was referring to the most favored club from UEFA on the planet earth, Real Uefadrid. Also the wish is normally made with the teams already advanced to the next round. He could've made the wish on Thursday, not on Monday! Besides, that's very disrespectful for the other clubs that were still competing, but definitely not a coincidence.

 

[Endri]

Exactly! A little! Nothing worth a damn penalty.

Bro it was irony, how can you push in that area and before he hitted the ball he hitted vasques shoulder first , isnt that obvious , push , hitted from behind in an open goal chance come on now guys

 

[spectrejoe]

You clearly have not watched football long enough to fully grasp its rules. Learn more about this beautiful sport and then come up with such ridiculous comments.

The moment that I've read that 'hip height' thing I understood that I'm losing my precious time arguing with an immature football fan, but oh well. Since we're at it, that 'above hip height' foot raising thing is technically an indirect foul, and it is given inside the box as well, but it is not a penalty! Indirect fouls do not equal penalties. You're proving yourself wrong as now it turns out it was an indirect foul in the box. Learn before commenting!

Idk man how about you read what I said? I said it's not worthy of penalty, I did mention that 3 infractions are most definitely worthy of penalty.

By your posts and the user 2 posts up are just salty.

Anyone that isn't a juventus fan sees this is a penalty.

3 Infractions in a single play "Not worthy of a penalty"

 

[Ernestismyname]

Bro it was irony, how can you push in that area and before he hitted the ball he hitted vasques shoulder first , isnt that obvious , push , hitted from behind in an open goal chance come on now guys

First of all, it's hit not hitted.
Secondly, he did touch the ball. If you can't see it then you might need to get your eyes checked.
Thirdly, it wasn't an open goal. Buffon could've very well saved it so don't get cocky.

 

[SH-M]

And what that hand behind vasques back is doing , maybe pushing a little

Football is a contact sport and quite physical. If there were penalties and fouls called for every slight push, the matches would last 4-5 hours long, but that doesn't happen because slight contact is allowed. Basketball is renowned for calling fouls after slight pushes, but I'd bet that this wouldn't have been called even in a basketball 2 pointer jump.

Idk man how about you read what I said? I said it's not worthy of penalty, I did mention that 3 infractions are most definitely worthy of penalty.

By your posts and the user 2 posts up are just salty.

Anyone that isn't a juventus fan sees this is a penalty.

3 Infractions in a single play "Not worthy of a penalty"

It doesn't matter much at this point anyway. The penalty was given, the cheats have gone through but this beautiful sport is getting ruined, and unrealistic fans are not helping much either, that's the moral of the story.

 

[Ernestismyname]

Idk man how about you read what I said? I said it's not worthy of penalty, I did mention that 3 infractions are most definitely worthy of penalty.

By your posts and the user 2 posts up are just salty.

Anyone that isn't a juventus fan sees this is a penalty.

3 Infractions in a single play "Not worthy of a penalty"

I'm not a juventus fan and I see no penalty there. I can admit that Benatia used a little force but again, nothing worth a damn penalty!

 

[Clive56]

I won't deny that UEFA is slowly becoming a criminal organization, but I was referring to the most favored club from UEFA on the planet earth, Real Uefadrid.

Oh you're backtracking now? You were opining that Perez paid to get Bayern. Which is ludicrous, because most Madridistas woulda preferred Roma, not a Bayern who have wrapped up their league.

Now you're talking about being favored in a match where Isco's goal was wrongly disallowed that'd have made the game 1 - 1, and a clear penalty was awarded.

If that had happened at the Madrid end and the referee hadn't called it, I can bet my hat you would be screaming blue murder as well. You clearly have a thing against Madrid. The penalty is just a lame excuse to take a shot. Which is a shame.

 

[Endri]

First of all, it's hit not hitted.
Secondly, he did touch the ball. If you can't see it then you might need to get your eyes checked.
Thirdly, it wasn't an open goal. Buffon could've very well saved it so don't get cocky.

I just cant understand something , isnt that tackle called dangerous because the tackle is from the back and he might hit vasquez head