Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress Live Now

He donated money to 80% of the people questioning him, expect plenty of softball questions.
 
Say what you want about Zuck, his business practices, his robotic nature, etc. The dude knows what he is doing, and he is absolutely killing these questions, softballs or not.

Can you tell when he opened his mouth?

fhjvxCY


I'm happy about it... especially since Amazon, Facebook, and Tesla total up to about 45% of my Robinhood portfolio. This has been a rough past 30 days or so...

EDIT: fuuuuuuuckin' Orrin Hatch.
 
he is clever in answering those questions xD , and also when he was asked something and he replied senator i run ads, the senator and the other behind and beside the senator smiled xD
 
He's a greedy cunt, but assuming these old farts can analyse the brain and understand the doings of a tech billionaire, and even have the audacity to ask "what's Facebook doing to protect the US elections" is laughable to say the least. It's a private company, it doesn't owe you anything and trying to hold it accountable for every third party looking to abuse the massive amounts of data it has is ridiculous. He owns a private business, which we willingly use and agree to its terms. Whether some of that data is used to target audiences for political reasons or not is not relevant, what's relevant is that you agreed to it in the first place, and it's not Facebook's job to protect the world from everyone with an agenda.
 
The things that amazes me is that unlike credit cards and other institutions that handle personal information there seems to be little regulation on FB. Feeling that is about to change.

-ThopHayt
 
You know what is funnies about all this stuff??? That you cannot promote in facebook soft core dating apps, or websites like tinder with 0 nudity, as it is still "adult content", but you can pump millions money in election campaigns ads...

(Mod edit: Sorry, I had to remove this part since it was getting too political).... So why the f*** they not ban election ads??? Because it is judge money to facebook.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They can point fingers all they like, but Facebook doesn't owe them shit.

US government has had their fair share of leaking user information on both large and small scales.

Never mind the nightmare that social security numbers are as a national ID number, failing to protect their citizens.

Sure, let me hand over the main ingredient to stealing my identity to anyone and everyone who wants it. ;)
 
They can point fingers all they like, but Facebook doesn't owe them shit.

US government has had their fair share of leaking user information on both large and small scales.

Never mind the nightmare that social security numbers are as a national ID number, failing to protect their citizens.

Sure, let me hand over the main ingredient to stealing my identity to anyone and everyone who wants it. ;)

Yes there is plenty of bad stories when government do bad stuff on their people, but there need to be control and I'm happy that government do something about this. Corporations like facebook or google have to many power in those IT times... So if government will gonna sit and don't do anything after 10 years it may be very big problems, like in russia, or north korea where one person is like a god...
 
This whole thing is :poop: (like the new emoji? ;))

In this case, I think this one is better suited:

giphy.gif
 
Lie!

How do you prevent that russian cannot buy election ads on facebook?

We are asking identity confirmation and and location, we are sending to it post address mail with code. :DDD

lol I'm using facebook ads on my account, I never sent my documents or confirmed my location to facebook.
But best of all I`m ussing my girlfriends paypal to pay for ads that whose opened in UK. :DDD
 
In this case, I think this one is better suited:

giphy.gif
I heard Mr. Co-- (I couldn't see the rest of his name) bring up the issue of how you can report violent content on Facebook and Facebook will refuse to take it down. Now that's a cool senator! Some of those other guys were out of the loop, But must Co (I'm assuming his name is Mr. Cool) knows what's up. Edit: I think his name was Senator Chris Coons.

Also, Zuckerberg used D.A.R.V.O like a douche and kept bringing up how he was just a wee littl' lad in a dorm room stealing, I mean starting Facebook.
 
Zuck didn't nail it, the Senators didn't really know the drill and the whole thing was a non event except you had to know that Zuck was feeling a tad uncomfortable as they kept passing the baton to drill him.

Lindsay Graham, "What other services are there like FB?". He was expecting an all inclusive service(s) or a rebuttal that made sense to him.

Yo, Senator Graham, IM has so many different facets there is almost nothing that is an exact match.

This is not Sesame Street.

 
He probably knows all the secrets of all those politicians. This is why he is so cool. First time in history where the alleged thief is cool and all the judges are trembling.
 
Sen. Supercentenarian: So, Mr. Zucker- *cough cough*... Zuckerberg, are you doing anything bad with the... with the bookface?
Zuckerberg: *Awkward pause followed by blank stare into the abyss*, Mr. Senator, I would never do anything unethical with Facebook as I have ethics of the highest degree ever since I started Facebook in my college dorm room.
Sen. Supercentenarian: Okay, and, uh, would you *cough cough* would you say you're *cough cough*, excuse me, would you, you're uh... bad, anything bad with the bookface's *reads notes* "you-sir in-FO-may-shin"?
Zuckerberg: *Awkward pause followed by blank stare into the abyss* Mr. Senator, protecting user data with our state-of-the-art TCP/IP MD5 HASH double-twister ULTRA-SECURE-GUARANTEED fibre optic algorithms has always been at the top of our priorities.
Sen. Supercentenarian: Oh, uh, all right then *cough cough*.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top