IamNRE
Elite Member
- Aug 18, 2010
- 7,164
- 10,717
Currently there's a rule that prevents BHW members from sharing with the general community what a MOD has said/done in private (i.e issued warnings / infraction etc.).
I believe this could lead to some MODs feeling that they can get away with murder and do anything they want. Because if you were to post what a MOD has done its called "MOD Abuse".
Why shouldn't the general BHW members be able to have MOD's actions be scrutinized in day light by the rest of the community?
Is this a democracy, or a dictatorship ? Just wondering....
I believe if we remove this rule, it would keep MODS in check and prevent them from possibly abusing their powers.
Because they'd have to answer to the general community if they issued silly warnings or infractions or bans over some ego / power trip.
What do you guys think?
I believe this could lead to some MODs feeling that they can get away with murder and do anything they want. Because if you were to post what a MOD has done its called "MOD Abuse".
Why shouldn't the general BHW members be able to have MOD's actions be scrutinized in day light by the rest of the community?
Is this a democracy, or a dictatorship ? Just wondering....
I believe if we remove this rule, it would keep MODS in check and prevent them from possibly abusing their powers.
Because they'd have to answer to the general community if they issued silly warnings or infractions or bans over some ego / power trip.
What do you guys think?