Which expired web 2.0 is better

[SativaBuzz]

Well, Xrumer and GSA blasts have almost no value/power nowadays. And with getting expired ones, you don't have to screw up with linkbuilding if you do not want to. Web 2.0s do not really get penalised, nor they are toxic, so no need to pay too much attention to overall cleanliness there at all.

Nah! I love what i am doing right now.I am pretty sure many dominating using tiered link building strategies including myself.. Google has RRFs so better to go with a very related background.

While many people wasting their time and money on scraping expired domains and vanities, managing hundreds of domain registrars/hostings it's wise to use link building tools for link building.

Nowadays you need proxies, captchas,vpss no matter what you are into..these are must. When considering it's not a big deal to spend some time on automated link building tools.

If you bake a nice sativa cake or cannaoil it makes the things much smoother

I have over 30 tests on my hand. All testings on fresh backlinks .

Boosting authority is an art and passing juice is on each tier is the passion ha ha.

~Peace

 

[Nargil]

Nah! I love what i am doing right now.I am pretty sure many dominating using tiered link building strategies including myself.. Google has RRFs so better to go with a very related background.

While many people wasting their time and money on scraping expired domains and vanities, managing hundreds of domain registrars/hostings it's wise to use link building tools for link building.

Nowadays you need proxies, captchas,vpss no matter what you are into..these are must. When considering it's not a big deal to spend some time on automated link building tools.

If you bake a nice sativa cake or cannaoil it makes the things much smoother

I have over 30 tests on my hand. All testings on fresh backlinks .

Boosting authority is an art and passing juice is on each tier is the passion ha ha.

~Peace

Well if you enjoy it, I won't argue

To me, any tiered link building doesn't really make sense from ROI and time points of view.

 

[vmaart]

Well if you would like to go deeper into the web2.0 and see which one is better -perhaps you can further analyze the link profile for the expired web 2.0 - analyze the links and see which one has a better link profile. Often, a good site that has another quality pointing back would either boost its PA or TF. I'd go for the TF metric >20, and check using Moz's spam score for the link profile. A high spam score wouldn't be a good candidate for the web2.0, as it suggests that the web2.0 has a lot of spammy links pointing back to it, thus it would be better not to use that respective web2.0

Bro how do I analyse "link profile for the expired web 2.0" plz advice me

 

[vmaart]

I confirmed it. It's not DA it's PA. Sorry for my typo mistake. While I check webmaster it has 80k links, but in majestic it's shows only 15k only.

 

[kosik]

Majestic and others tools never show all links.

 

[vmaart]

Majestic and others tools never show all links.

How could I know?

 

[jani]

Both are good and make sure you have chosen the correct niche if not try to make them accordingly with content