Sharing 2000+ available domains with links from Huff po

[Sherb]

Well this should get very interesting very quickly.

EDIT: And it did!

 

[Nargil]

Your amazing arguments swept me off my feet. You should run for president.

To clarify a few things for you. Ahrefs picks more backlinks than Majestic, but most of the time, they are completely worthless. It's true, that Majestic sometimes doesn't catch a decent backlink, but same is applied for Ahrefs. 90% people use Majestic as a benchmark due to these reasons. I use, as a sheer minimum, 10RD, in Majestic. If you want to use Ahrefs for the same quality give or take, you need to set that number higher.

But let's see:

swingstateofmind.com - Former Japanese PBN - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/swingstateofmind.com/#0
coolingtower-design.com - Some spun crap affiliate site - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/coolingtower-design.com/#3
culturalcogntion.net - Definitely wasn't a PBN with that random Cloudflare in hosting history - https://web.archive.org/web/20161002011955/http://culturalcogntion.net/ - http://www.hosterstats.com/historicaldns.php?domain=culturalcogntion.net
sacredtension.com - Formerly personal blog spammed with "bathroom" anchors.
voterfactcheck.com - Spammed with skin care anchors.
faminecity.com - PBN - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/faminecity.com/#0
safesexishotsex.com - Adult stuff.
holstersiwb.com - 303 referring domains from 36 IPs, sounds legit. But I will use Ahrefs for you, 169 referring domains from 13 IPs. Funny, here I thought Ahrefs should show more referring domains. Legit nonetheless.
milehighnorml.org - Former Japanese PBN - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/milehighnorml.org/#2
craigmillerforcongress.com - Former Japanese PBN - https://web.archive.org/web/20170516230754/http://craigmillerforcongress.com/
iraqpaperscissors.com - Former PBN or what kind of spammy crap that is - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/iraqpaperscissors.com/#1
earthdayonthepromenade.org - Japanese PBN - http://research.domaintools.com/research/screenshot-history/earthdayonthepromenade.org/#0

Alright, so these were a few I checked quick, don't have time to bother with it too much. There wasn't a single clean domain.

Anyone who can turn on a computer can scrape Huffpost and run the domains through bulk analysis in Ahrefs. Hard part comes after that. So as I have said in my initial post, everyone should check the domains properly before the registration. And yes, I doubt there's more than 5 clean ones in that list you shared, that have RD10+ in Majestic. But, as I have said in the first post again, I appreciate the share.

And one last thing. There's a fine line between being arrogant and within the rules and acting like a puberty stricken teenager with zero emotional control.

 

[living2xl]

It's true, that Majestic sometimes doesn't catch a decent backlink, but same is applied for Ahrefs. 90% people use Majestic as a benchmark due to these reasons

If you see your initial post that triggered this, you see you claimed 5 domains not having more than 10 RD, this has nothing to do with decent backlinks it has to do with numbers, you clearly try to save your butt by trying to add the word "clean backlinks" to it. Which your examples do not even illustrate, they illustrate HISTORY which is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT THING.

And first of all all the references you make are to do with the HISTORY of the site, not the BACKLINKS it has, as you claimed from the start. Anyone see this how he tries to twist his words?

First statement of Nargil:

I really doubt there will be more than 5 usable domains with at least RD of 10.

When caught red handed, for not having checked shit before opening his mouth. When in fact there are HUNDREDS with rd>10

Quickly changes it to:
Clean Backlinks

Then later again changes it in the exact same post to:
Clean domains

Pathetic to have to resort to twisting your own words to save ass

As hundreds of them have clean backlinks.
The art of gurutardness right in front of you.
I'm not good with words but I am good at logic and numbers and data. Something you clearly lack.


2nd please stop spreading myths that domains with a pbn history in the above context of mostly excellent links are worth any less. This is not the case. Sorry.

Anyone who can turn on a computer can scrape Huffpost and run the domains through bulk analysis in Ahrefs

And anyone can turn on archive.org and check the history. Which is why we dont need gurutards like you trying to make it seem like this is rocket science. It is not.

Bravo for sifting through the few domains and picking out a few which have a different history but excellent backlinks, want a cookie? There are hundreds of others and the backlinks are great. Those domains when brought back to life, will have a potential for a myriad of purposes and most will flourish just fine.


Whats even more pathetic is that you are trying to attack me for providing something useful and FREE : )

Nowhere in my post did I make any claim regarding the data or metrics or history but simply provided a FREE list, which anyone can use.
Which turned out to be pretty damn fucking good.

 

[PixelMathis]

dennonoor.com

If you see your initial post that triggered this, you see you claimed 5 domains not having more than 10 RD, this has nothing to do with decent backlinks it has to do with numbers, you clearly try to save your butt by trying to add the word "clean backlinks" to it. Which your examples do not even illustrate, they illustrate HISTORY which is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT THING.

And first of all all the references you make are to do with the HISTORY of the site, not the BACKLINKS it has, as you claimed from the start. Anyone see this how he tries to twist his words?

First statement of Nargil:



When caught red handed, for not having checked shit before opening his mouth. When in fact there are HUNDREDS with rd>10

Quickly changes it to:
Clean Backlinks

Then later again changes it in the exact same post to:
Clean domains

Pathetic to have to resort to twisting your own words to save ass

As hundreds of them have clean backlinks.
The art of gurutardness right in front of you.
I'm not good with words but I am good at logic and numbers and data. Something you clearly lack.


2nd please stop spreading myths that domains with a pbn history in the above context of mostly excellent links are worth any less. This is not the case. Sorry.

And anyone can turn on archive.org and check the history. Which is why we dont need gurutards like you trying to make it seem like this is rocket science. It is not.

Bravo for sifting through the few domains and picking out a few which have a different history but excellent backlinks, want a cookie? There are hundreds of others and the backlinks are great. Those domains when brought back to life, will have a potential for a myriad of purposes and most will flourish just fine.


Whats even more pathetic is that you are trying to attack me for providing something useful and FREE : )

Nowhere in my post did I make any claim regarding the data or metrics or history but simply provided a FREE list, which anyone can use.
Which turned out to be pretty damn fucking good.

so do you think having "clean domains", as nargil says, is not absolutely necessary?

 

[Nargil]

2nd please stop spreading myths that domains with a pbn history in the above context of mostly excellent links are worth any less. This is not the case. Sorry.

No, they are not worth any less, they are worth exactly nothing.

And anyone can turn on archive.org and check the history. Which is why we dont need gurutards like you trying to make it seem like this is rocket science. It is not.

Well here you said that you have checked them. Apparently it's rocket science for some:

I have personally checked these domains on ahrefs as I picked the ones I need for my own before sharing here.

Nowhere in my post did I make any claim regarding the data or metrics or history but simply provided a FREE list, which anyone can use.

No, you claimed that you have checked them before posting them here, as stated above. Anyway, why are you acting like a drama queen, when I told people to make sure they are clean? You haven't said once that people should do that.

"I really doubt there will be more than 5 usable domains with at least RD of 10." - Usable, as in, within common PBN domain standards, where the fact that they are clean goes without a saying.

To sum it up, you posted a freshly scraped list that anyone can get within 15 minutes, haven't checked a single domain in it, asked people to like your post and then got triggered (with multiple infractions against the rules) when you were called out for soliciting and when I pointed out that people should do their own due diligence. End of story.

 

[living2xl]

No, you claimed that you have checked them before posting them here, as stated above.

I said I ran them through ahrefs bulk analyses and exported Please read it again

No, they are not worth any less, they are worth exactly nothing.

You are right, now you can go and play gurutard again. Bye
Anyone else will enjoy this share. after doing their due diligence and checking whatever they have up their sleeve.

so do you think having "clean domains", as nargil says, is not absolutely necessary?

This is not absolutely necessary. Your assessment should depend on what purpose you will use the domains for, if it is for a money site then of course maintain stricter criteria. That said I have raised domains with such history, added to them ONLY duplicate content and still get a shit ton of organic traffic. If it is for a PBN then simply go for it, it all depends on how efficient you are and how much time/money/effort goes into each pbn, if you are more resourceful you can afford to lose a 2-3 easily of every hundred you reg for example.
You should always check ahrefs organic history to see if after the historical point that the site had such content and closed google still had it indexed for terms. Chronology is key here. if so then go for it
That said even if so, it can and does often still work out. This is a simple check that will not take you more than a few seconds.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

All this bickering and some people are missing that there are some decent domains in that list.

Of course you have to do your own due diligence, and in my case, that would be manually checking the domains after using your tools.

But should you put the effort in you'll find some domains that are certainly worth buying in the list.

 

[PixelMathis]

thanks for the reply, living2

 

[Soucha]

It took a while and most the domains do seem spammed of course but I believe I was able to find a clean RD 18 with an active, ranking huff post link.
Thanks OP.

 

[MikeyMikey13]

Lol at all these people saying you need clean domains... my tier 2 blog network is full of either RD5-10 sites or spammed/previous pbn sites, don't be fooled by what you read.

Buy one VPS, 10 spammed domains put them all on CF with same VPS and test for yourself. You will be very surprised

 

[damagesmith]

Lol at all these people saying you need clean domains... my tier 2 blog network is full of either RD5-10 sites or spammed/previous pbn sites, don't be fooled by what you read.

Buy one VPS, 10 spammed domains put them all on CF with same VPS and test for yourself. You will be very surprised

What does put them all on CF Mean?

 

[MikeyMikey13]

What does put them all on CF Mean?

Cloudflare, or any other dns management software such as noIP

 

[damagesmith]

Lol at all these people saying you need clean domains... my tier 2 blog network is full of either RD5-10 sites or spammed/previous pbn sites, don't be fooled by what you read.

Buy one VPS, 10 spammed domains put them all on CF with same VPS and test for yourself. You will be very surprised

Have you ever tried it with s ahared hosting account?

 

[soa0611]

i have a controversial feeling in my head after reading this thread.

 

[tshirtpromo]

Thanks for sharing living2xl but Nargil does have a point. I did not find any domains that were clean that I would be wiling to use as a PBN to a money site on the list that was not registered. Perhaps I was too late.

*I actually found one but someone took it already.

 

[soa0611]

Lol at all these people saying you need clean domains... my tier 2 blog network is full of either RD5-10 sites or spammed/previous pbn sites, don't be fooled by what you read.

Buy one VPS, 10 spammed domains put them all on CF with same VPS and test for yourself. You will be very surprised

if i understood you correctly you are using such domains for powering tier1 links

 

[look_nohat]

wonder how did you manage to get this list, through scraping or exporting from service/site?
anyway, thanks for the list

 

[SEO JOKER]

Hi mate, Nice update It's really helpful.

 

[bartosimpsonio]

wonder how did you manage to get this list, through scraping or exporting from service/site?
anyway, thanks for the list

Using a whois database.

 

[MikeyMikey13]

if i understood you correctly you are using such domains for powering tier1 links

You are correct. Either us clean PBNs or buffer sites as your T1 links.