Majestic.... "The planet's largest Link Index database"

[Rust Son]

Huh? Why do they make that claim when ahrefs shows many many for links for every single site I monitor?

What am I missing?

 

[mickyfu]

What am I missing?

Errm it's quite simply marketing spiel.

 

[terrycody]

I AM bill gates.

 

[skywalkerph]

it is their marketing strategy

 

[MisterF]

Not too shabby figures.

 

[Nargil]

I've started using Ahrefs more actively lately and the only significant difference I see is, that Ahrefs is listing every single crappy Blogspot link, while Majestic does not. Here and there there are some other differences in their indexes, but that goes both ways. What Majestic catches, Ahrefs doesn't and vice versa.

 

[bobs01]

SEMrush is the worst on backlinks. It takes months for them to find my new ones. Just wanted to vent a little cause SEMrush cost a small fortune a month.

I know SEMrush is good at other things but if they were good at backlinks too they would be like an all in one tool almost.

 

[MikeyMikey13]

I've started using Ahrefs more actively lately and the only significant difference I see is, that Ahrefs is listing every single crappy Blogspot link, while Majestic does not. Here and there there are some other differences in their indexes, but that goes both ways. What Majestic catches, Ahrefs doesn't and vice versa.

Agreed.. I've noticed Majestic isn't very good at picking up Wiki links. There is a few sites they don't crawl intensely.

 

[davids355]

Would be great to see index persentsge between ahrefs, majestic, google, bing etc. I think ahref claim to index / crawl more data than bing don’t they?