Is it okay to use GSA ser link blast for tier1?

[hasan7707]

Is it safe? Or will it have bad effect on my money site?

Should I make one more tier before giving the link blast, I mean, should I implement it on from tier 2 and above or is it safe for tier 1 as well?

I bought 10 web 2.0 properties from a service on this forum and have updated the web 2.0s with more content so it doesn't look like thin content made only for SEO purpose. And now I'm now thinking of blasting them with GSA ser links. Should I go for it?

I appreciate your every reply. Thank you.

 

[PlofAtayuga]

Since you already have the web 2.0s, I'd say yes, blast them. Safer and probably not any less effective.

 

[Tishina]

GSA should always be one of your last tiers.

 

[hasan7707]

Since you already have the web 2.0s, I'd say yes, blast them. Safer and probably not any less effective.

May I ask what you would personally do in a situation like this? Would you go for it, buddy?

 

[hasan7707]

GSA should always be one of your last tiers.

Is it necessary for me to build more tiers?

I mean, will it have any downsides to my moneysite?

 

[Tishina]

Is it necessary for me to build more tiers?

I mean, will it have any downsides to my moneysite?

In my experience, the more the better.

I'm doing 3, sometimes 4 tiers of link building for my website.

Tier 1 are links from authority websites.
Tier 2 are links from web 2.0's
Tier 3 are links with Magic Submitter
Tier 4 are links with GSA

It won't have downsides to your moneysite because the more the layers the safer it is for you.

 

[Scritty]

GSA has two limitations for 1st tiers.

Firstly it has a defined set of platforms it links to , and most of them are not particularly good. They are open door CMS platforms that almost invite spam or have already been mentioned by Google (Jon Mueller for instance has hit article sites, directories and random image sites in his comments on Google hang outs). The other limitation is the content you use.

GSA does have a few very good platforms you can link to - and is capable of supporting great content. It also has the settings and plug ins to ensure links only appear on high quality sites if the user chooses to use them and limit the number of links created to only instances where good content goes on good platforms only when the individual site is itself with decent authority.

It's perfectly capable of doing that...

But other than a few people I rarely if ever see it used that way. And "fire and forget" GSA blasts can be a disaster. So like most tools, it's the user not the use.
It's been used badly enough often enough for the false idea that it's not capable of making good links to be considered true. I doubt that perception will change any time soon.

 

[hasan7707]

GSA has two limitations for 1st tiers.

Firstly it has a defined set of platforms it links to , and most of them are not particularly good. They are open door CMS platforms that almost invite spam or have already been mentioned by Google (Jon Mueller for instance has hit article sites, directories and random image sites in his comments on Google hang outs). The other limitation is the content you use.

GSA does have a few very good platforms you can link to - and is capable of supporting great content. It also has the settings and plug ins to ensure links only appear on high quality sites if the user chooses to use them and limit the number of links created to only instances where good content goes on good platforms only when the individual site is itself with decent authority.

It's perfectly capable of doing that...

But other than a few people I rarely if ever see it used that way. And "fire and forget" GSA blasts can be a disaster. So like most tools, it's the user not the use.
It's been used badly enough often enough for the false idea that it's not capable of making good links to be considered true. I doubt that perception will change any time soon.

Hmm, though I'm not any SEO expert, I still kind of get your point.

However, I'm about to buy one package from this forum on link blast. I guess, the links will probably be spammy. Will it hurt if I use that on my tier 1s? Or should I go for one more tier first?

 

[Slin25]

I did it with a site and didn't receive a penalty but I saw no improvements either. That was over a year ago, so you're probably safe, just not worth it in my experience.

 

[Array Experts]

GSA is A Tool You Can Use it Even For Money Site If You Know What You Doing.

Build Only Contextual (Article) Links With GSA For Your Web 2.0 Than Blast Tier 2 For Safe Side This Strategy Working Well As I Selling Web 2.0 Service Seen Good Result With This Strategy..

There is Lot Of Web 2.0 Case Study in This Forum If You Search You Will Find Easily or Check Marketplace See Seller Like Me Selling Web 2.0 Services Which Strategy They Are Using & What Their Buyer Saying About Their Service

 

[710fla]

You should use GSA to build backlinks to your web 2.0

 

[Shaunm]

GSA is A Tool You Can Use it Even For Money Site If You Know What You Doing.

This.

GSA should always be one of your last tiers.

It totally depends on your strategy. The main thing I am using SER for right now is to post to my self-hosted PBNs and BNs on T1. No point putting them in my last tiers....

 

[hadron]

In my experience, the more the better.

I'm doing 3, sometimes 4 tiers of link building for my website.

Tier 1 are links from authority websites.
Tier 2 are links from web 2.0's
Tier 3 are links with Magic Submitter
Tier 4 are links with GSA

It won't have downsides to your moneysite because the more the layers the safer it is for you.

Does Magic Submitter still work ? how different is it from gsa ?

 

[MisterF]

This.



It totally depends on your strategy. The main thing I am using SER for right now is http://shaunmarrs.com/?s=self%20hosted%20domains&utm_source=blackhatworld.com. No point putting them in my last tiers....

Tool You Can Use it Even For Money Site If You Know What You Doing. - Totally, the tools can be used effectively IF the person knows how to use them correctly. There's also the risk of doing damage it any tool like this is used incorrectly.

 

[Shaunm]

Does Magic Submitter still work ? how different is it from gsa ?

Its similar to SERE and builds web 2.0s, its been a while since I used it but it seemed pretty solid back then but I preffer SERE for my web 2.0s.

thanks for the reply. i too had thought of creating a group of domains that i would repeatedly use at tier 2/3 in any project.
but will that not involve a lot of work ? like you would need to have atleast 10-20+ domains.
and what about the outbound link count. as you use the domains more and more, the obl keeps rising.
is there some recipe to that ?

Internet Marketing is a lot of work, my test network is 25 domains, if it works, its getting expanded to thousands. I don't care about the OBL count, it's not like a Bridge network is not like a PBN. With a PBN you are using one or two pages on the domain to launder link juice to your money sites. With a Bridge Network you just want a stable T1 link that you control.

The OBL count will go up as pages increase but the pages are 100% human made content at a rate of 2/3 pages per week per domain. Although this is theory and I havent proven the concept yet, if you look at a domain with open submissions getting slammed by SER, its getting hundreds or thousands of new pages per day all with autospun content linking out. I would guess thats where the problem comes from.

 

[Speed23]

OP, don't blast your tier 1 with GSA. If you do, your money site ranking will fly to Jamaica. In fact, so many threads here will actually confuse you.
After so many trials with the tool, it doesn't worth the effort for tier 2.
Just build another batch of web2.0 with social bookmarks. Index all, then build GSA contextuals, index and build last spam links.