marly
Regular Member
- Nov 4, 2010
- 297
- 67
In between cleaning up my PC (thing was getting slow as hell, ain't no way to work without getting bald), enjoying the sun and in between some failed projects (adapting to mistakes), I recalled some saying I read from McGregor:
Mayweather, your no fighter, your a boxer.
In the end he came back from it saying Mayweather had some crazy good techniques.
But still, if you think about it, wouldn't Mcgregor beat Mayweather's ass in MMA in just a few seconds?
Isn't fighting on the street more of a complete package? With fighting on the streets I mean a random fight.
So is Mcgregor right, or do you think mayweather would still kick ass at MMA?
In other words, what do you think, is boxing a sport you could really use in outdoors fighting, or does an allround fighter have a big advantage?
Probably people more experienced with these questions as I am.
Mayweather, your no fighter, your a boxer.
In the end he came back from it saying Mayweather had some crazy good techniques.
But still, if you think about it, wouldn't Mcgregor beat Mayweather's ass in MMA in just a few seconds?
Isn't fighting on the street more of a complete package? With fighting on the streets I mean a random fight.
So is Mcgregor right, or do you think mayweather would still kick ass at MMA?
In other words, what do you think, is boxing a sport you could really use in outdoors fighting, or does an allround fighter have a big advantage?
Probably people more experienced with these questions as I am.