yeah. I like the new algo putting spam and trash on page 2.
I have never heard of this before. So if you have links more than your competitors, it could harm your website? Irrespective of the quality of the links?Black sheeps websites are those who actually get far more backlinks than everyone else.
I have never heard of this before. So if you have links more than your competitors, it could harm your website? Irrespective of the quality of the links?
Well.
Try with topical relevance:
- Add more content to page you're trying to rank, like 200 or 300 words but don't include keywords or optimize it
- Add 3 or 4 topically related articles and link to your main page you're trying to rank and then build links to these supporting articles.
It's strange how similar our situations are - my site is even the same age as yours. How long ago did you build the links? Many people are experiencing that links take a lot longer to kick in than usual.
I bet it socail engagement ?
What there socail stats against yours?
If it's your site that is 7 months old you are gonna probably have to wait longer. Don't get impatient and try to get your site to the first page by throwing more links at it, it could do more harm than good. Build more content, super long content is the way to go, 2,000 + word articles. More words the better.
When I am building a site up, I throw a little "spam" at it. If I am going to build 5 PBNs for a keyword, I'll get a VA to do 50 blog comments, a couple directories, and order a bundle of web directories to my pages as well, besides the web2s and PBN links. A little spam throws people off the scent sometimes, plus in many niches, looks perfectly valid.i not understand why most people always think that someone is hiding PBN links and blocking ahrefs, majestic.. if those guys are smart to do it they woudnt be having spam in first place on their sites such as comments, social bookmarks and other trash quality links. Ofc its possible that someone spammed them after they ranked, and once established site its hard to do negative SEO on them but you cant be sure to tell this and what exactly is going on..
just build more links but something strong mate.. and you should move up
Google is pretty stupid in the last few months. Spam and shit ranks while quality doesn't. The funny thing is when I try to spam and make shit I don't rank![]()
When I am building a site up, I throw a little "spam" at it. If I am going to build 5 PBNs for a keyword, I'll get a VA to do 50 blog comments, a couple directories, and order a bundle of web directories to my pages as well, besides the web2s and PBN links. A little spam throws people off the scent sometimes, plus in many niches, looks perfectly valid.
I might be able to help you. I have a new method I know will work but I haven't really tested it much yet. I'll do it for you for free this time. Message me your site and keywords.
Buying backlinks sometimes can hurt your rankings. Google knows if you are trying to do blackhat.
so what's the point ?
I learned this here bro: http://diggitymarketing.com/stuck-on-page-2-are-you-the-black-sheep/
I can give you some free credits to crawl and analyze their backlinks using Linkquidator. We crawl backlinks directly (beside using ahfres and majestic), and we are not so known, so as a rule, no one restricts or hide links from our crawler. Maybe that will help you. If you are interested, please sign in, and PM. I will add credentials.Might be, but their website is really poorly built and has thin content as well. I doubt that they blocked the crawlers, but it might be.
They hide links not from Google, they hide their linkbuilding strategies, links donors, and referral domains from competitors.i not understand why most people always think that someone is hiding PBN links and blocking ahrefs, majestic.. if those guys are smart to do it they woudnt be having spam in first place on their sites such as comments, social bookmarks and other trash quality links.
just build more links but something strong mate.. and you should move up