- May 10, 2012
- 9,539
- 7,559
Just shoot message to @littlewebdragon or @bossofthebosses or @blackbeans and you have cheap unique non spun content. Not worth taking risks with spun crap. Even though I am expecting @MikeyMikey13 to arrive anytime soon 
Articles for PBN?
- Thread starter WeWontBeAlone
- Start date
- Jan 20, 2013
- 9,340
- 994
If you are not interested in writing the articles just hire freelancers to finish it.Spun content is not so effective, and you have decent domains right.So use unique content.
- Jun 25, 2015
- 3,973
- 847
Unique handwritten content will be the best for tier 1 link building method. Maybe some spun articles will help to index the article, but not sure to rank the site. But with my experience, Some article will show some good hike at first, then it goes down with the spun articles. SO it's better to go with high-quality handwritten content.
MikeyMikey13
BANNED
- May 25, 2014
- 2,340
- 1,024
What recent update attacked spun content on PBN's? Because I had absolute no effect from any update on PBNs with or without spun content.
OP you can get some nested spin articles that will work (get roughly 60 uses for 90$)
Or buy some cheap articles from a seller on here. 2$ type stuff works just fine
@littlewebdragon or @bossofthebosses do articles that I use for my PBNs and Web 2.0s, not as cheap as spun but these are better quality.
SeoWrecker
Elite Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 2,708
- 2,192
Spun content for Pbns was always a NO, let alone the recent update.
Coming back to how effective it is, the link juice highly depends on the domain power and not the article so I would not deny it has no effect on the rankings but I can assure you whatever positive movements you may be seeing aren't going to last for more than a while.
Also, using Spun articles on your pbn is a massive footprint. A manual reviewer will take less than 2 seconds to conclude it's a PBN
SeoWrecker
Elite Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 2,708
- 2,192
If you want a proof, ask the seller that commented before you.
MikeyMikey13
BANNED
- May 25, 2014
- 2,340
- 1,024
So in other words, no recent update effected spun content at all. But it may be less effective, as it has always been? Right okay bud.
Yes it is more risky, but it completely depends on what you are using the PBN for.
Another thing, you use subjective claims from an objective standpoint. "Effective" and "going to last" mean something completely different to me, then you. I understand the risk from using spun content, but I also don't care if they get hit.
You should remember that there isn't right way or a wrong way with this.
aidenhera
BANNED
- Nov 30, 2016
- 3,059
- 915
theres a lot of misinformation on bhw because human nature like to share things they think is true.
if spun is poorly made then it will repeat the same words in too short distance from their previous instances = onpage overoptimization (i think this was added just recently). from what i noticed, facebooks youtubes and web20s seems to handle more spammed kw density and proximity and still rank with it than my own domain
however i dont think onpage optimization applies to our backlinks (or even backlinks from internal pages. they drop from ranking yes, but the page that is linked from penalised internal page doesnt drop)
tbh i didnt check it but maybe if we massively overspammed internal pages that link to landing page (the one we rank) then supporting pages will drop in rank but the TF-IDF will increase like crazy crazy crazy and it will positivel influence landing page (the one without overoptimization that has links from supporting pages)
SeoWrecker
Elite Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 2,708
- 2,192
It very much seems like you want to go after me for not being specific with the update. You have agreed to everything else. My bad, I wasn't clear enough. Let me clarify this now
Why did I mention "recent update"?
1)There are an endless number of users complaining about their penalized pbn after the fred update.
2) Google is taking forever to index new articles and using spun content is only going to make it worse.
3) Google is vigorously targeting PBN's and sites with thin content. Your chances of getting hit doubles if you are using spun content on your pbn.
I don't see a single reason to use spun content anymore.
I am not using subjective claims, there are at least 10 comments in the thread backing my claims ( If the count is not exact please don't consider it as an opportunity and backfire on me). the only user that is doing good with spun content is you. Not everyone here is after churn and burn projects. I am sorry if that is offending you but someone here asked for an advice and that's the best I could do.
Disagree!
Using handwritten content for your pbn is the right way and using spun content is the wrong way.
uesat
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2013
- 272
- 45
What recent update? Do you have a link?
SeoWrecker
Elite Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 2,708
- 2,192
uesat
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2013
- 272
- 45
What a load of bullshit in this thread. Even from some of the respected "gurus" in here. Where do you guys think those writers who sell cheap articles get their articles? They use PLR's or hubpages or a similar source, SPIN THEM, edit them, copyscape them, then sell them back to you as a "100% unique, handwritten, article".
- May 10, 2012
- 9,539
- 7,559
uesat
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2013
- 272
- 45
Thanks, but there's nothing about spun articles in there. The article is about Google hitting PBN's with a recent update, but then says nothing about it. It reads like a gossip magazine. No proof. Just some dude's thoughts.
SeoWrecker
Elite Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 2,708
- 2,192
That usually happens when you pay writers less than what it costs to buy a spun content.
uesat
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2013
- 272
- 45
Sure buddy, because you can't scrape content from expired domains
I think you're in the wrong thread buddy.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,539
- 7,559
I am not.
uesat
Regular Member
- Sep 25, 2013
- 272
- 45
Nah. I'm talking about cheap articles. You know the ones you buy for PBN's.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,539
- 7,559
I know, and I am saying, that in case of the sellers I have tagged here, they come from expired domains that haven't been around for quite some time. That's a quite well known technique to get a decent content for free.