yViews - Youtube view system

hi, im interested, let me know.
thanks

Brainstorming said:

Oh joy, another YouTube views exchange. Will you guys stop copying Viewets program/idea. It's not as easy as you think to start something like this up. Come up with your own new idea, stop copying other peoples stuff. It's a waste of time when you could be creating something original that no one has done yet and actually make some decent money.

Click to expand...

Your an idiot. The more view systems the better.

Besides, if nothing was ever copied, there would never be competition...

Coke, pepsi, rc cola, big K, etc.
nintendo, microsoft, sony, 3do, etc.
Dell, Hp, Apple, etc.
Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda, etc.

Should I keep going for your small mindness?

The only people that say "Don't copy" are the people who are making money off the product, consumers love copies, that stops the monopoly from happening, and also gets companies to strive for bigger (or smaller) and better things.

And since you are a newbie, I am glad you are here, to COPY others hard work

I'm interested in seeing if your system will work decently so i can give me videos a boost

risingstaralliance said:

Your an idiot. The more view systems the better.

Besides, if nothing was ever copied, there would never be competition...

Coke, pepsi, rc cola, big K, etc.
nintendo, microsoft, sony, 3do, etc.
Dell, Hp, Apple, etc.
Ford, Chevy, Toyota, Honda, etc.

Should I keep going for your small mindness?

The only people that say "Don't copy" are the people who are making money off the product, consumers love copies, that stops the monopoly from happening, and also gets companies to strive for bigger (or smaller) and better things.

And since you are a newbie, I am glad you are here, to COPY others hard work

Click to expand...

Copy others hard work? I am the owner of Viewet (released way before any other view increasing software).

Now, lets get some things straight, for your small "mindness".

You say the more view increasers the better, because you get more views. I don't blame you for saying that, because you're the idiot that you are. I know everything there is to know about YouTube views and here's what your "small mindness" doesn't know:
YouTube has IP logs. If the same IP is viewing videos in a none human like manner, their IP address is temporarily blocked from giving any YouTube views for a 24 hours period. Using 1 view increaser does not cause this problem. Now, when you have multiple view increasers and all of these users are using them all, you have people who are running maybe 2-4 different view increasing applications. This then get their IP blocked temporarily, very quickly. Then, they continue to use the 2-4 systems and they are giving views, but the views are not counting because their views are blocked and aren't unblocked until the excessive amount of views stop. So for people who have copied my system, (Vagex, U2bviews, etc.) who then have users using mine and all of theirs, it causes my users to have worse results.

Now, if you can't grasp what I'm saying here and why it angers me that my idea was copied by many and which in turn causes worse results for my users as I posted above, then I'll just stop here, because you're not worth my time with your "small mindness".

PS. Did you seriously just compare YouTube View Increasing Software to Coke, Pepsi, Microsoft, etc.?

Brainstorming said:

Copy others hard work? I am the owner of Viewet (released way before any other view increasing software).

Now, lets get some things straight, for your small "mindness".

You say the more view increasers the better, because you get more views. I don't blame you for saying that, because you're the idiot that you are. I know everything there is to know about YouTube views and here's what your "small mindness" doesn't know:
YouTube has IP logs. If the same IP is viewing videos in a none human like manner, their IP address is temporarily blocked from giving any YouTube views for a 24 hours period. Using 1 view increaser does not cause this problem. Now, when you have multiple view increasers and all of these users are using them all, you have people who are running maybe 2-4 different view increasing applications. This then get their IP blocked temporarily, very quickly. Then, they continue to use the 2-4 systems and they are giving views, but the views are not counting because their views are blocked and aren't unblocked until the excessive amount of views stop. So for people who have copied my system, (Vagex, U2bviews, etc.) who then have users using mine and all of theirs, it causes my users to have worse results.

Now, if you can't grasp what I'm saying here and why it angers me that my idea was copied by many and which in turn causes worse results for my users as I posted above, then I'll just stop here, because you're not worth my time with your "small mindness".

PS. Did you seriously just compare YouTube View Increasing Software you Coke, Pepsi, Microsoft, etc.?

Click to expand...

And my point is proving when I said the only people who don't like competition is the owners.

With that said, most of what you said is old news and most of us already know, however, there are a few things that are ridiculous. No computer an simulate human characteristics, but rather have a set of rules to separate what it is looking for. So the ip log is just one way, there are many more, and I hope being the owner of viewet you know that.

As far as viewet goes, it used to be Greg wen spk ran and owned it. I am not sure I you bought it or helped with the idea, but we all know spk was the mastermind behind it, so don't act like its your own solely. And I relieve vagex came out when viewet wasn't gaining any views.

As far as using multiple view programs, perhaps it is your small mindness that doesn't see that the same 1000 users viewers on viewet are the same 1000 on vagex, otherwise how can you explain the reason that vagex consistenly has a better ratio them viewet? Probably because there are different people that use both. Sure, there are some that do both, but obviously not all. That mixed with some of the other rules I mentioned earlier.

You can write another post like the previous statement, but it doesn't bother me, it just goes further to prove my point that the only people who care are those who have something to lose... In your case, money and customers.

Personally, you should encourage him as he may help u in the future or figure something put. After all, that is why we all are here... Not to personally attack someone you dont know, like you just did to me. You have no idea my intelligence or background.... But you just showed us how childish you are.

Back to topic. Op, I would love to try this out. Especially now that I am going to cancel my account with viewet. But for the record, I occasionally use vagex also.

risingstaralliance said:

And my point is proving when I said the only people who don't like competition is the owners.

With that said, most of what you said is old news and most of us already know, however, there are a few things that are ridiculous. No computer an simulate human characteristics, but rather have a set of rules to separate what it is looking for. So the ip log is just one way, there are many more, and I hope being the owner of viewet you know that.

As far as viewet goes, it used to be Greg wen spk ran and owned it. I am not sure I you bought it or helped with the idea, but we all know spk was the mastermind behind it, so don't act like its your own solely. And I relieve vagex came out when viewet wasn't gaining any views.

As far as using multiple view programs, perhaps it is your small mindness that doesn't see that the same 1000 users viewers on viewet are the same 1000 on vagex, otherwise how can you explain the reason that vagex consistenly has a better ratio them viewet? Probably because there are different people that use both. Sure, there are some that do both, but obviously not all. That mixed with some of the other rules I mentioned earlier.

You can write another post like the previous statement, but it doesn't bother me, it just goes further to prove my point that the only people who care are those who have something to lose... In your case, money and customers.

Personally, you should encourage him as he may help u in the future or figure something put. After all, that is why we all are here... Not to personally attack someone you dont know, like you just did to me. You have no idea my intelligence or background.... But you just showed us how childish you are.

Back to topic. Op, I would love to try this out. Especially now that I am going to cancel my account with viewet. But for the record, I occasionally use vagex also.

Click to expand...

Huh? What are you talking about...? This is almost complete bullshit. Even I know this.. Firstly, it wasn't SpK who came with the idea, it was Nick. Secondly, vagex doesnt have a better ratio than viewet.

risingstaralliance said:

And my point is proving when I said the only people who don't like competition is the owners.

With that said, most of what you said is old news and most of us already know, however, there are a few things that are ridiculous. No computer an simulate human characteristics, but rather have a set of rules to separate what it is looking for. So the ip log is just one way, there are many more, and I hope being the owner of viewet you know that.

As far as viewet goes, it used to be Greg wen spk ran and owned it. I am not sure I you bought it or helped with the idea, but we all know spk was the mastermind behind it, so don't act like its your own solely. And I relieve vagex came out when viewet wasn't gaining any views.

As far as using multiple view programs, perhaps it is your small mindness that doesn't see that the same 1000 users viewers on viewet are the same 1000 on vagex, otherwise how can you explain the reason that vagex consistenly has a better ratio them viewet? Probably because there are different people that use both. Sure, there are some that do both, but obviously not all. That mixed with some of the other rules I mentioned earlier.

You can write another post like the previous statement, but it doesn't bother me, it just goes further to prove my point that the only people who care are those who have something to lose... In your case, money and customers.

Personally, you should encourage him as he may help u in the future or figure something put. After all, that is why we all are here... Not to personally attack someone you dont know, like you just did to me. You have no idea my intelligence or background.... But you just showed us how childish you are.

Back to topic. Op, I would love to try this out. Especially now that I am going to cancel my account with viewet. But for the record, I occasionally use vagex also.

Click to expand...

Of course I'm mad people copied my idea. Who in their right mind wouldn't be? If you knew what the owner of Vagex did, you would further understand my frustration. How would you feel if someone stole your idea, then came to your forum and spammed every single one of your members with a link to his program that copied mine? That's besides the point though, because I knew this would eventually happen. But I'll continue to have the best software and results out of them all.

Viewet has 100% of views counting right now and SpK has been off Viewet for months now and when he left 10% were counting, so how do you explain that? SpK and I started Viewet together, I came up with the entire concept, so to give him all the credit is ridiculous. Also, you said it used to be great when SpK ran and owned it, yet, I was running and owning it with him. Before you start jumping to conclusions, know what you're talking about first.

Most of what I said was old news? If it was old news why did you comment the way you did clearly indicating that you had no idea of the way the YouTube view counting system works? If it was old news you would know that using more than one view increaser hurts the entire system. Now, this may seem like a contradiction, considering I just said if you use both it will cause all views to not count, yet I have 100% of views counting, but I have recently found a way to get all of the views counted and to bypass these IP view blocks from using more than one view increaser by delivering safe views in a completely different manner than anyone else.

Now this on the other hand is a contradiction by you: "As far as using multiple view programs, perhaps it is your small mindness that doesn't see that the same 1000 users viewers on viewet are the same 1000 on vagex, otherwise how can you explain the reason that vagex consistently has a better ratio them viewet? Probably because there are different people that use both."
For starters, Viewet for about a month now has had much more views counting than Vagex. We have about 100% of views counting now as I stated above, so you're way off on this, but what have you been right about yet? No surprise. You then go on to say "the same 1000 people using Viewet are the same 1000 people using Vagex", but then your "small mindness" goes on to say: "Probably because there are different people that use both." Make up your mind. Do they all use the same programs or are their different people? Obviously your "small mindness" has no idea what you're talking about and can't make up your mind, but I know the facts and I don't need you to enlighten me.

I love how you then turn this into you being the victim saying I attacked you saying: "Not to personally attack someone you don't know, like you just did to me. You have no idea my intelligence or background.... But you just showed us how childish you are." when you came at me first personally attacking me when I hadn't said anything to you. Scroll up and read the conversation. You were not in the thread at all, then you comment to me calling me an idiot and small mindness when I hadn't said a word to you, now you're trying to act like I was the one to attack you when you started with your rant and insults? This goes to prove that you're clearly not all there, but that's another story.

I'm done with you. I think I have proven my point twice, very clearly.
- You don't know what you're talking about
- I called you out, you didn't know what to do, so you contradict yourself and act like you're the victim now
- I am clearly more knowledgeable about anything regarding YouTube Views and my own system and software

@brainstorming

To answer your PM, No, I do not think I am wrong, nor do I agree with what you said, but it is clear that what I said, you are not interpreting exactly what I am saying and you are stuck in your way of thinking.

I am not in high school anymore so I do not need to sit here like a child arguing over something petty. Nor do I need to waste my time responding to you, or trying to prove my point and see whos chest (d*ck) is bigger. I am not a child. I stated that what you said was a waste of time and dumb, you stated your opinion, I responded, and you kept going.... And I have way better things then to sit here and have a virtual argument on who is right/wrong/in between. Its pointless. So I chose to be the man and walk away without drawing this out and causing wasted bandwidth, and causes a ton of garbage in this thread.

I don't care if you think you are smarter then me, cause I don't care if you are or are not. You don't know me, and I do not know you. I just know my opinion, which is the only people who cry about other companies copying them is the people that own another company.

As a consumer, I am glad there are choices. That stops the monopoly, makes products better, and prices more reasonable.

As far as vagex or viewet or any others... I expressed my results, and those results showed that vagex increased more of my videos views better then viewet. If others have other results, great, but when I tested it, those were my results. I can't help the facts.

I am not even going to go back and re-read everything you wrote to defend myself, cause I do not care what you say. I am here to learn, and help others and make money. Not get in a pissing contest, so please refrain from messaging me again looking for a fight or a response, cause it is a waste of my time.

I am content with what I have said, and done, so if you want to take that as a "win" so you can pat yourself on the back because you are not worth my time to respond again... feel free. I'm mature enough to not need that, nor care .

On a sidenote, I find it funny that you say you are done with me, then PM me looking for closure.

I don't have time to read all this right now, cause I'm busy, but from what few words I read, I just want to clarify something. I never stated I was smarter than you. I also didn't start the argument here. I'm not going to waste my time with another long post responding to each little thing, because I'd rather be making money. But you have to remember you came at me and I just came back with my arguments. That's just how I am, I'm a fighter, whether it be physical, verbal or typing. It's all good though, no hard feelings, everyone has their own opinion and they're entitled to voice them.

Back to work.

@brainstorming

To answer your PM, No, I do not think I am wrong, nor do I agree with what you said, but it is clear that what I said, you are not interpreting exactly what I am saying and you are stuck in your way of thinking.

I am not in high school anymore so I do not need to sit here like a child arguing over something petty. Nor do I need to waste my time responding to you, or trying to prove my point and see whos chest (d*ck) is bigger. I am not a child. I stated that what you said was a waste of time and dumb, you stated your opinion, I responded, and you kept going.... And I have way better things then to sit here and have a virtual argument on who is right/wrong/in between. Its pointless. So I chose to be the man and walk away without drawing this out and causing wasted bandwidth, and causes a ton of garbage in this thread.

I don't care if you think you are smarter then me, cause I don't care if you are or are not. You don't know me, and I do not know you. I just know my opinion, which is the only people who cry about other companies copying them is the people that own another company.

As a consumer, I am glad there are choices. That stops the monopoly, makes products better, and prices more reasonable.

As far as vagex or viewet or any others... I expressed my results, and those results showed that vagex increased more of my videos views better then viewet. If others have other results, great, but when I tested it, those were my results. I can't help the facts.

I am not even going to go back and re-read everything you wrote to defend myself, cause I do not care what you say. I am here to learn, and help others and make money. Not get in a pissing contest, so please refrain from messaging me again looking for a fight or a response, cause it is a waste of my time.

I am content with what I have said, and done, so if you want to take that as a "win" so you can pat yourself on the back because you are not worth my time to respond again... feel free. I'm mature enough to not need that, nor care .

On a sidenote, I find it funny that you say you are done with me, then PM me looking for closure.

well it appears no matter who started viewet, this guy or spk, they are all dicks. viewet works ok, but jeez dealing with teenagers suck. they get their e-feelings hurt so easy

dakota5369 said:

well it appears no matter who started viewet, this guy or spk, they are all dicks. viewet works ok, but jeez dealing with teenagers suck. they get their e-feelings hurt so easy

Click to expand...

This thread is completely irrelevant to how I run my business. I don't handle support emails or posts on my forum regarding my software or service the same way as I respond to someone calling me an idiot and mindless. There's a big difference.

Wow, ya'll sound like children. Way to threadjack.

mattcash said:

Wow, ya'll sound like children. Way to threadjack.

Click to expand...

Was never meant to threadjack, and I apologize to OP, that is why I stopped the discussion and only replied about the PM basically saying to drop it (even said that I didnt want to threadjack in my post).

And apologize to anyone who wastes there time reading any of that junk.

risingstaralliance said:

Was never meant to threadjack, and I apologize to OP, that is why I stopped the discussion and only replied about the PM basically saying to drop it (even said that I didnt want to threadjack in my post).

And apologize to anyone who wastes there time reading any of that junk.

Click to expand...

Actually i enjoy reading your post . and your very very right .

About yviews and OP . He has some personal problems thats why he didnt answer anymore , but he will update this tool

Good pointed : ,, As a consumer, I am glad there are choices. ''

Brainstorming said:

I don't have time to read all this right now, cause I'm busy, but from what few words I read, I just want to clarify something. I never stated I was smarter than you. I also didn't start the argument here. I'm not going to waste my time with another long post responding to each little thing, because I'd rather be making money. But you have to remember you came at me and I just came back with my arguments. That's just how I am, I'm a fighter, whether it be physical, verbal or typing. It's all good though, no hard feelings, everyone has their own opinion and they're entitled to voice them.

Back to work.

Click to expand...

LOL I love this argument in this thread but you both not right. Viewet is good as a system to get slow stable views over a long period of time. But there are massive businesses out there that sell 100K views in just a few days. So really there are ways and means.

At one time Jumpstart used to change an amazing amount of money per month to get views in that were no more than 200-300 a day. Thank god those days are gone thanks to vagex and viewet. Where credits are a lot cheaper than jumpstart used to charge.

Google has a right to check IPs as they pay per advertisers looking at them. That is the only reason they are trying to stop spam from IPs. It is because they would not be worth a light to Advertisers.

I hope when Viewets youtube buying page comes out that it will be a lot cheaper than other sources that really are overpriced. In fact so much so if I put them on my videos I would make a loss not a profit.

Steve

Don't argue. Viewet's idea was yours Nick, but don't forget that Vagex didn't do anything different than what "we" did. EnhanceViews was way before Viewet, and when you gave me the "concept" I instantly told you "Like EnhanceViews?"

chemer said:

LOL I love this argument in this thread but you both not right. Viewet is good as a system to get slow stable views over a long period of time. But there are massive businesses out there that sell 100K views in just a few days. So really there are ways and means.

At one time Jumpstart used to change an amazing amount of money per month to get views in that were no more than 200-300 a day. Thank god those days are gone thanks to vagex and viewet. Where credits are a lot cheaper than jumpstart used to charge.

Google has a right to check IPs as they pay per advertisers looking at them. That is the only reason they are trying to stop spam from IPs. It is because they would not be worth a light to Advertisers.

I hope when Viewets youtube buying page comes out that it will be a lot cheaper than other sources that really are overpriced. In fact so much so if I put them on my videos I would make a loss not a profit.

Steve

Click to expand...

What do you consider cheaper? I had an idea to do 3$ per 1,000 views, but then as cheap as 200$ per 100,000 views. That will be for slow views (1,000 a day). But, then fast views will be 10,000 a day and be a little more.

Hi,

I like to test the software
waiting for the Link

Thanks

The first beta is done...
Link : http://www.mediafire.com/?n98sjuv9jl2hpst
This is only for testing .
Soon we will move to a dedicated server , after we will make the website for this leave reply about anything or send a pm