Yes. It is possible to create bots that work with ads. It would probably cost more to do than you will actually make though.As far as I understand, no commercial bot works. The bots that work are the ones that people with programming skills create for their personal use.
Now, with how sensitive and delicate youtube is to these issues if you do not know very well what you are doing, it is best to try to generate traffic organically because otherwise, losing accounts is very easy.
I think they are working, even these commercial from forum.As far as I understand, no commercial bot works. The bots that work are the ones that people with programming skills create for their personal use.
Now, with how sensitive and delicate youtube is to these issues if you do not know very well what you are doing, it is best to try to generate traffic organically because otherwise, losing accounts is very easy.
Why are you saying Gmails with cookies? I'm pretty sure just Residental proxy is needed with the bot.I think they are working, even these commercial from forum.
But there is no enough feedback with them, because initial setup will cost $700-$1000
As I calculated, I need:
-bot, almost $200/year so it's fine
-proxies, $200-$300/month, must be residental and integrated with bot, so cannot buy different one
-gmails with cookies, $400 for 10 000, it's nonsense to test bot on some smaller number
Probably I will be testing this one from forum in some time, but initial set up is costly for me currently.
I was testing too many things and on the end of the day I was getting hammer hit in my head.
Views with logged in Gmails are very powerful, much more than not logged.Why are you saying Gmails with cookies? I'm pretty sure just Residental proxy is needed with the bot.
I tried both with Accounts and with just Ip's results was the same, unless you are using the accounts for comments and such.
Do you really think being logged in makes such a big difference? I always bot logged out and it works (unlike panel views, idk what exact shortcuts they take that make them so shitty, but it doesn't seem to be being logged in vs not logged in, since logged out views from my bot work fine). I do think engagements matter a lot (the faster you get likes/comments/subs since upload the better) but I normally get real engagements anyway when I bot views so I focus on views. What I mean is if most views (ie all botted views) come from not logged in but there are some (real) people that are logged in w/ real accounts and they leave some likes/comments/subs it works great.Views with logged in Gmails are very powerful, much more than not logged.
I can see it, because I have some Android app where I can open Youtube to my users. Not a lot, because I can make 500-1000 views, but they are so much powerful than smmpanel views.
Also cannot use it a lot, because people are angry xD
You can also build niche gmails. For example if you are making game hack video, then use your bot for few days watching videos about your game.
Then on the end boost your video with game hack.
This is the problem of smmpanel views - not logged in views.
Can you elaborate on livestream views? I see some people have great results with that, are these just panel views?that is no possible to work with bots anymore its dead work already everybody just buying traffic for youtube stream viewers and push up ur streams thats all
Hey astro, you won't get banned for botting. You can get banned for content (violating yt community standards, real or fake copy strikes, etc) but if you use the same bot on 'legit' content you won't get ban. Some niches are just very ban prone, but it's not due to software itself. I checked because I was concerned about it too. It's not the views, unless you do something retarded like 20k fake views on first video on a fresh channel xD then you'll get shadowban on a video but not terminated channel. Warm up your channel and you'll be fine.As far as I understand, no commercial bot works. The bots that work are the ones that people with programming skills create for their personal use.
Now, with how sensitive and delicate youtube is to these issues if you do not know very well what you are doing, it is best to try to generate traffic organically because otherwise, losing accounts is very easy.
it makes a big difference if you use accounts for views, when those accounts engaged with videos similar to yours.Do you really think being logged in makes such a big difference? I always bot logged out and it works (unlike panel views, idk what exact shortcuts they take that make them so shitty, but it doesn't seem to be being logged in vs not logged in, since logged out views from my bot work fine). I do think engagements matter a lot (the faster you get likes/comments/subs since upload the better) but I normally get real engagements anyway when I bot views so I focus on views. What I mean is if most views (ie all botted views) come from not logged in but there are some (real) people that are logged in w/ real accounts and they leave some likes/comments/subs it works great.
Can you elaborate on livestream views? I see some people have great results with that, are these just panel views?
Hey astro, you won't get banned for botting. You can get banned for content (violating yt community standards, real or fake copy strikes, etc) but if you use the same bot on 'legit' content you won't get ban. Some niches are just very ban prone, but it's not due to software itself. I checked because I was concerned about it too. It's not the views, unless you do something retarded like 20k fake views on first video on a fresh channel xD then you'll get shadowban on a video but not terminated channel. Warm up your channel and you'll be fine.
I know which services that you meant, I also planning to use it. if you already do it, can you share me the result later? I also have some project that needed to be done, so I can't really do that for now.I think they are working, even these commercial from forum.
But there is no enough feedback with them, because initial setup will cost $700-$1000
As I calculated, I need:
-bot, almost $200/year so it's fine
-proxies, $200-$300/month, must be residental and integrated with bot, so cannot buy different one
-gmails with cookies, $400 for 10 000, it's nonsense to test bot on some smaller number
Probably I will be testing this one from forum in some time, but initial set up is costly for me currently.
I was testing too many things and on the end of the day I was getting hammer hit in my head.
not did, it's too expensive for me right now to just test. I tested many expensive services and it was always like piss in faceI know which services that you meant, I also planning to use it. if you already do it, can you share me the result later? I also have some project that needed to be done, so I can't really do that for now.
also it's interesting to have gmail account creator bot, since we can make our own 'niche gmail'. the problem with gmail cookies, it will be used widely by everyone thus the account will watch various kind of videos in different niches, but if we can create our own gmail army in each niche, I think it will weight more for google. just my 2cent
Gmail's Army is a good idea, but who will be coordinating it for free? On the other hand, won't anyone here cheat on others?I know which services that you meant, I also planning to use it. if you already do it, can you share me the result later? I also have some project that needed to be done, so I can't really do that for now.
also it's interesting to have gmail account creator bot, since we can make our own 'niche gmail'. the problem with gmail cookies, it will be used widely by everyone thus the account will watch various kind of videos in different niches, but if we can create our own gmail army in each niche, I think it will weight more for google. just my 2cent
Who told you about such JV? By "our gmail" army he though about personal gmail army, not something that belongs to group. You not understood somethingGmail's Army is a good idea, but who will be coordinating it for free? On the other hand, won't anyone here cheat on others?
Hi there ! Do youtube bots work? are Famous youtubers using Bots to bring Millions of views to their videos ?
which bots WORK? Is anyone Selling a YOUTUBE working Bot which youtubers already use?
Just like Lukmat said, I'm not talking about JV, but creating 'my own and only gmail army'. for my own use.Gmail's Army is a good idea, but who will be coordinating it for free? On the other hand, won't anyone here cheat on others?
I don't agree. bot can help. sure you can create natural channel, but sometimes it will take 1-2 years. bot can make it faster. if you're doing it right.It's a pain in the ass...
We tried at our company with minor channels but it's really not worth it anymore.
Play by the rules, create great content and be smart about how you will attract traffic to your channel.
You can lose a lot of time looking for the magic tool...
+bots have no business value, your target audience has and if you create great content, they will want to watch your videos.
okay. friend. The bot works fine. It is also possible to rank keywords with 2 million volumes. It's affordable, and you can do it for just $300 a month. Keep studying.Just like Lukmat said, I'm not talking about JV, but creating 'my own and only gmail army'. for my own use.
I have lots of whiteboard animation channel, so boosting some views for that channel is needed.
so the recipe is : HIGH QUALITY CONTENT + BOOSTING VIEW = STABLE INCOME CHANNEL
I don't agree. bot can help. sure you can create natural channel, but sometimes it will take 1-2 years. bot can make it faster. if you're doing it right.
the reason why most of people fail isn't because of the bot, but because they're too focus on the bot and not creating enough quality content.
it's like trying to make a restaurant going viral but the food is filthy. even if people will come, they will go again and never return.