The anti Spotify stuff cracks me up.
I can say after personally reviewing statements for dozens of artists that the per spin on Spotify even including the free accounts is MUCH higher than YT.
No comparison, really.
If Youtube were trying to pay more like Spotify, that'd be a good thing. I highly doubt that's going to happen. It may for the short term, but it will go down as the pool increases.
Never did quite understand why people bash Spotify while giving YT a free pass. Mainly confusion and misinformation about artist vs songwriter royalties, and confusion and misinformation about what Spotify pays vs what little piece of that the labels actually pass on.
Financially speaking, an average Spotify user (including the free ones in the average) generates more revenue than an average iTunes user. That's just a statistical fact... and both companies pay out the same percentage... which means the average Spotify user (again, including the free ones in that average) generates more ARTIST INCOME than the average iTunes customer.
You want to get upset at someone, start with Facebook who doesn't give a crap that their platform is being used to freeboot your stuff, and is doing absolutely nothing to drive any compensation whatsoever.
Spotify pays out 70% to artists. Youtube pays 55% in theory, but does some accounting gymnastics that would make a 50's era record label proud. Facebook pays 0%.