Royal96
Power Member
- Mar 16, 2019
- 683
- 376
Right now I'm writing a few new blog posts and I'm trying a new strategy:
I'm looking at the top 10 search results for my target keyword and basically combining the articles.
In the beginning I'm identifying what kind of posts are ranking. For example list posts, how to posts, case study posts, etc.
Let's say it's a list post about tips to achieve something. Now I'm looking at all the subtopics of the top 10 search results and writing them down.
For example the 1st and 2nd are having 7/10 subtopics about the same thing. Then I would take the 7 subtopics of both articles + the other 3 subtopics of each articles and write a blog post with 13 subtopics.
My theory: Unless the competition doesn't have a ton of backlinks and authority, I should rank higher because my content is including more of the top search results than the other websites.
Is that a common strategy? Because from my point of view it absolutely makes sense.
I'm looking at the top 10 search results for my target keyword and basically combining the articles.
In the beginning I'm identifying what kind of posts are ranking. For example list posts, how to posts, case study posts, etc.
Let's say it's a list post about tips to achieve something. Now I'm looking at all the subtopics of the top 10 search results and writing them down.
For example the 1st and 2nd are having 7/10 subtopics about the same thing. Then I would take the 7 subtopics of both articles + the other 3 subtopics of each articles and write a blog post with 13 subtopics.
My theory: Unless the competition doesn't have a ton of backlinks and authority, I should rank higher because my content is including more of the top search results than the other websites.
Is that a common strategy? Because from my point of view it absolutely makes sense.