I have been using xrumer profile links for a while. I usually blast 12.000 to a single URL in one shot.
Single 12.000 K blast
-------------------------------------------------------
- This is beneficial for older url/older page which has existing backlinks, usually rankings is up for older url/older page which has existing backlinks
- Rankings for newer url/page with no existing backlinks is usually up after a blast but will gradually down after some time, some times rankings can be extremely down for 5 pages or more.
Conclusion
------------
- It seems like that Google is more tolerant to older urls/pages with existing backlinks.Rankings for older urls/pages is more suistanable.
- A single 12.000 K blast to a newer page/url with no backlinks will raise alert to Google filters . Rankings for this url/page will be up for a while before G penalize/drop them down, it seems like G often ignore massive influx of links to a newer page/url with no existing backlinks.
Solution
--------
Instead of putting 12.000 links to a single page/url in one shot, I will have to do it gradually , probably 1000 links per week over three month period = 12.000 links after three months.
G will then see those links as legit and will count them in.
1st 1000 links, week 1 . G:uhmm let's up ranking for this url/page for a while. I will analyze this url/page later.
2nd 1000 links, week 2 . G:Uhmm , Links to this url/page is probably legit.
3rd 1000 links, week 3 . G:More legit, ranking is up
4th 1000 links, week 4 . G:More legit, ranking is up
5th-12th links, week 5 - 12. Ranking is up, up and up again.
I haven't tried the gradual approach for newer URL/page but it seems to make sense. Is this the better way to do it?.Is my analysis correct? Suggestions and comments please.
Thx!
Single 12.000 K blast
-------------------------------------------------------
- This is beneficial for older url/older page which has existing backlinks, usually rankings is up for older url/older page which has existing backlinks
- Rankings for newer url/page with no existing backlinks is usually up after a blast but will gradually down after some time, some times rankings can be extremely down for 5 pages or more.
Conclusion
------------
- It seems like that Google is more tolerant to older urls/pages with existing backlinks.Rankings for older urls/pages is more suistanable.
- A single 12.000 K blast to a newer page/url with no backlinks will raise alert to Google filters . Rankings for this url/page will be up for a while before G penalize/drop them down, it seems like G often ignore massive influx of links to a newer page/url with no existing backlinks.
Solution
--------
Instead of putting 12.000 links to a single page/url in one shot, I will have to do it gradually , probably 1000 links per week over three month period = 12.000 links after three months.
G will then see those links as legit and will count them in.
1st 1000 links, week 1 . G:uhmm let's up ranking for this url/page for a while. I will analyze this url/page later.
2nd 1000 links, week 2 . G:Uhmm , Links to this url/page is probably legit.
3rd 1000 links, week 3 . G:More legit, ranking is up
4th 1000 links, week 4 . G:More legit, ranking is up
5th-12th links, week 5 - 12. Ranking is up, up and up again.
I haven't tried the gradual approach for newer URL/page but it seems to make sense. Is this the better way to do it?.Is my analysis correct? Suggestions and comments please.
Thx!