drilonnn
Regular Member
- Oct 28, 2012
- 434
- 401
The content is not theirs, and google would not be here where it is without us(the publishers), so your statement is wrong.You lose nothing because the traffic is not yours. It's google's.
The content is not theirs, and google would not be here where it is without us(the publishers), so your statement is wrong.You lose nothing because the traffic is not yours. It's google's.
Why is it wrong? Is the traffic yours?The content is not theirs, and google would not be here where it is without us(the publishers), so your statement is wrong.
As long as i answer the question from the searcher, the traffic belongs to me.Why is it wrong? Is the traffic yours?
Go ahead then, de-index your site and don't let google use your content. The tell me who's really wrong.
No, not really. Google has invested millions in branding since the 90s. That traffic belongs to them until a user lands on your page, not before.As long as i answer the question from the searcher, the traffic belongs to me.
And without google and its model the free Internet of today we all love wouldn't exist. The Internet without google would probably be dominated by the big multimedia companies behind a pay wall, like cable tv but on the Internet. Google has made posible for anyone on the planet to create a website and succeed.As i said, google wouldn't be here without us, and such it still relies on us for everything. If we were to boycott google, then they would go bankrupt
LOL. No point in continuing this argument anymore with you.free Internet of today we all love wouldn't exist.
LOL. No point in continuing this argument anymore with you.
Happy you like my word haha, english is not my first language and I realise that sometimes I freestyle a little bit, I saw that this word do in fact exist but is very rarely used.
But yes my point was that you cannot do anything with google, they are untouchable, even when they steal content! They are like the tax office, you must play by their rules, even if you don't like it.![]()
If Google's so strong, then why do they have all these lawsuits against them?
https://www.engadget.com/2019/03/11/lawsuit-details-google-exec-payouts/
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/22/tech/google-street-view-privacy-lawsuit-settlement/index.html
https://ww.9to5google.com/2019/08/12/google-pixel-microphone-lawsuit-settlement/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/26/technology/google-university-chicago-data-sharing-lawsuit.html
https://www.wired.com/story/james-damores-lawsuit-is-designed-to-embarrass-google/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/20/magazine/the-case-against-google.html
https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/17580694/google-android-eu-fine-antitrust
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/business/google-fine-advertising.html
You have a very good point, even if I think this is peanuts for them and that their power is too big, they could possibly have a lawsuit that really hurt their supremacy but for the moment they do what they want.