Great read. I also agree with moonlighsunligh you should get dragon, not only is it tons faster it's also far less fatiguing. Also get a decent microphone I have the WNC-1500 and it improved my accuracy a lot over the cheap headset i had before it. If you want to look at other potential headsets for dragon go to this site ****(can't post URL) Good luck
This stereo headset looks like it is durable enough even I have no doubt it is accurate. I use usb microphone Samson q1u instead and it gives a great accuracy compared to other microphones maybe even this one.
I have a very heavy indian accent. Would it be difficult. i have tried dictating via google translate , and transcription is way off the mark.Or is it my microphone ?
I have a very heavy indian accent. Would it be difficult. i have tried dictating via google translate , and transcription is way off the mark.Or is it my microphone ?
I actually attempt the opposite with my main money websites.
George Orwell is my inspiration here.
Code:[B]1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. [B]2. Never use a long word where a short one will do. [B]3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. [B]4. Never use the passive where you can use the active. [B]5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. [B]6. Break any of these rules sooner than saying anything outright barbarous. [/B][/B][/B][/B][/B][/B]
It is not usually perfect, but I try.
Yes. I would agree that is how most people see it."Precalculus prepares for calculus" would sound much more intelligent like "the core concepts of Precalculus courses are the predecessors of the more advanced topics found in calculus"
Yes. I would agree that is how most people see it.
But even when writing non-fiction these tips have helped me become a better writer. Maybe not a more productive or increased my conversion rate.
I personally would skip any writer who uses that sort of style to sound more intelligent. The hardest thing for a writer is to make his style seep through his words, and that is only possible if you remove all clutter from your sentences.
Yes, as far as building niche websites is concerned your style would definitely be more productive and efficient.
Wnateg-you have started in the small way and explored our multiple things out here. Finally you made a great share here. It takes much time to read the whole thing for me. It will really help the readers in their work well. I took a break twice while reading this. long long content OP. cheers!
great guide OP, really useful. Bookmarked, thanks
Thanks for taking time to share this great guide with us.
Yes, that is basically what I meant here:
So I basically have some topic that is to be discussed in the introduction that can be phrased as a question. In this article, it's essentially "what are the considerations involved with construction jobs?"
And then provide two answers to that question and structure them with the <h2> tags.
So "types of construction jobs" and "education and experience guidelines" are the answers to the main overreaching question of the article, "what are considerations of construction jobs?"
In 2011-2012, yes, you'd have h2's with the keyword over and over.
We've moved way past that. SEO isn't about optimizing for keywords. It's about optimizing for topics, which contain a couple of good longtails, a dozen or so decent longtails and 100's of low traffic longtails.
Google has something called the knowledge graph. Read up on the knowledge graph, LSI and keyword themes, then apply your new found SEO knowledge for your 3 authority site journey.
Does the article above look like anything other than "optimized for topics" and reader engagement? I have one h2 tag with the keyword or any variation of it. Throw it into a keyword density analyzer. Construction isn't even at 2%.
You quoted a response that doesn't even reference keyword optimization. It simply states how to structure the content with headers to break up the responses to the main question.
I'd like a reference of where I state h2 headings should contain keywords over and over though.
I don't write for the keyword; I write for reader. Apply that instead of the 7 different categories of keywords.
Thanks for the bump though!