Write An Article With Me! (Guide To Write Quality Content Quickly)

Great read. I also agree with moonlighsunligh you should get dragon, not only is it tons faster it's also far less fatiguing. Also get a decent microphone I have the WNC-1500 and it improved my accuracy a lot over the cheap headset i had before it. If you want to look at other potential headsets for dragon go to this site ****(can't post URL) Good luck

Seeing how some part of the "reputable community" behaves here, you will get accused at least 3 times that this is your website :)
Great post wnateg!
 
This stereo headset looks like it is durable enough even I have no doubt it is accurate. I use usb microphone Samson q1u instead and it gives a great accuracy compared to other microphones maybe even this one.

I have a very heavy indian accent. Would it be difficult. i have tried dictating via google translate , and transcription is way off the mark.Or is it my microphone ?
 
Dragon Naturally Speaking also comes with an Indian version. You may be able to find it on one of the torrent sites. Dictated this comment using Dragon Naturally Speaking Indian version.

I have a very heavy indian accent. Would it be difficult. i have tried dictating via google translate , and transcription is way off the mark.Or is it my microphone ?
 
Awesome mate, it takes me 2 hours to product 500 words on a niche I'm not familiar with and 1 hour with familiar niches.
 
I have a very heavy indian accent. Would it be difficult. i have tried dictating via google translate , and transcription is way off the mark.Or is it my microphone ?

I am from Europe, so English isn't my first language and it works for me. But good mic is important.

It is not difficult to master English pronunciation .. the most important is to use vocals properly (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQc1qRCjSzQ) while the consonants are even easier to learn (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSnenzetZLE).
 
Last edited:
Congratulation...
Its already a nice article OP.
 
Sorry I missed all these comments; I thought it had died!

Thanks some much for all the nice comments and suggestions! I'm glad people are finding it helpful.

I actually attempt the opposite with my main money websites.

George Orwell is my inspiration here.
Code:
[B]1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
[B]2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
[B]3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
[B]4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
[B]5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
[B]6. Break any of these rules sooner than saying anything outright barbarous.
[/B][/B][/B][/B][/B][/B]


It is not usually perfect, but I try.

That may be the case if I was writing an orwellian novel, but people will fall for anything on the Internet if it seems like you are very knowledgeable on the subject. The best way to give off that vibe is using stronger, more specific words. For example,

"Precalculus prepares for calculus" would sound much more intelligent like "the core concepts of Precalculus courses are the predecessors of the more advanced topics found in calculus"
 
"Precalculus prepares for calculus" would sound much more intelligent like "the core concepts of Precalculus courses are the predecessors of the more advanced topics found in calculus"
Yes. I would agree that is how most people see it.
But even when writing non-fiction these tips have helped me become a better writer. Maybe not a more productive or increased my conversion rate.
I personally would skip any writer who uses that sort of style to sound more intelligent. The hardest thing for a writer is to make his style seep through his words, and that is only possible if you remove all clutter from your sentences.

Yes, as far as building niche websites is concerned your style would definitely be more productive and efficient.
 
^ not sure about different writing styles.But, if you write simple to the point articles with 1-2 pictures then they convert great.

my opinion might be different since i am in cpa. , best thing is to read top 10 articles and then take best points from them and mix them to form a good article.
-=-
 
Yes. I would agree that is how most people see it.
But even when writing non-fiction these tips have helped me become a better writer. Maybe not a more productive or increased my conversion rate.
I personally would skip any writer who uses that sort of style to sound more intelligent. The hardest thing for a writer is to make his style seep through his words, and that is only possible if you remove all clutter from your sentences.

Yes, as far as building niche websites is concerned your style would definitely be more productive and efficient.

I would say the niche and desired audience decides if this faux intelligence tactic should be used, and the writers ability to utilize those techniques.

A poorly written "intelligent" article would have exact opposite effect on readers.
 
Wnateg-you have started in the small way and explored our multiple things out here. Finally you made a great share here. It takes much time to read the whole thing for me. It will really help the readers in their work well. I took a break twice while reading this. long long content OP. cheers!
 
Wnateg-you have started in the small way and explored our multiple things out here. Finally you made a great share here. It takes much time to read the whole thing for me. It will really help the readers in their work well. I took a break twice while reading this. long long content OP. cheers!

Thanks a lot!

great guide OP, really useful. Bookmarked, thanks

Glad you found it useful!

Thanks for taking time to share this great guide with us.

No problem!
 
Yes, that is basically what I meant here:




So I basically have some topic that is to be discussed in the introduction that can be phrased as a question. In this article, it's essentially "what are the considerations involved with construction jobs?"

And then provide two answers to that question and structure them with the <h2> tags.

So "types of construction jobs" and "education and experience guidelines" are the answers to the main overreaching question of the article, "what are considerations of construction jobs?"

In 2011-2012, yes, you'd have h2's with the keyword over and over.

We've moved way past that. SEO isn't about optimizing for keywords. It's about optimizing for topics, which contain a couple of good longtails, a dozen or so decent longtails and 100's of low traffic longtails.

Google has something called the knowledge graph. Read up on the knowledge graph, LSI and keyword themes, then apply your new found SEO knowledge for your 3 authority site journey.
 
In 2011-2012, yes, you'd have h2's with the keyword over and over.

We've moved way past that. SEO isn't about optimizing for keywords. It's about optimizing for topics, which contain a couple of good longtails, a dozen or so decent longtails and 100's of low traffic longtails.

Google has something called the knowledge graph. Read up on the knowledge graph, LSI and keyword themes, then apply your new found SEO knowledge for your 3 authority site journey.

Does the article above look like anything other than "optimized for topics" and reader engagement? I have one h2 tag with the keyword or any variation of it. Throw it into a keyword density analyzer. Construction isn't even at 2%.

You quoted a response that doesn't even reference keyword optimization. It simply states how to structure the content with headers to break up the responses to the main question.

I'd like a reference of where I state h2 headings should contain keywords over and over though.

I don't write for the keyword; I write for reader. Apply that instead of the 7 different categories of keywords.

Thanks for the bump though!
 
Kind of like writing about just dogs. And then someone comes in and says you can't write about dogs and cats you need to focus on dogs. WTF?

I thought wnateg was using the basic fundamentals of how to write an essay. And to break that thought process up he is using the topic of every so many paragraphs as the H2 tag. Books are still written in this format, so I can't imagine why Google would be penalizing for writing properly. But then again he is getting critiqued for something he is clearly doing, which is simply confusing.

And bump because this is one of the few useful threads on this forum in a very long time.
 
Some great tips in here, thanks. I always try n break my articles up to include call to actions at the top then the rest of the content just to have more info if the user requires it. Although every niche has a different requirement.
 
Does the article above look like anything other than "optimized for topics" and reader engagement? I have one h2 tag with the keyword or any variation of it. Throw it into a keyword density analyzer. Construction isn't even at 2%.

You quoted a response that doesn't even reference keyword optimization. It simply states how to structure the content with headers to break up the responses to the main question.

I'd like a reference of where I state h2 headings should contain keywords over and over though.

I don't write for the keyword; I write for reader. Apply that instead of the 7 different categories of keywords.

Thanks for the bump though!


Jeez, lots of anger.

Considering you're failing on your authority site journey and seem frustrated that you're barely ranking for anything good you should be more open to ideas.

I'm not even going to bother giving you any more advice.

Best of luck to you.
 
Back
Top