Working SEO Methods in 2016

Great share man. You should add more article on your blog . I love your blog also .
 
The best worKing method for seo in 2016 is backlinks and well interlinked content.

/thread
 
Natural SEO is the way to go.

There is no such thing as "natural SEO" also this is all fun and stuf, but if you're in a niche with any kind of competition you're going to need more then a view forumpostings and blogcomments, you're going to need real backlinks.
 
There is no such thing as "natural SEO" also this is all fun and stuf, but if you're in a niche with any kind of competition you're going to need more then a view forumpostings and blogcomments, you're going to need real backlinks.
If I just go after blog comment and forums links, would I really bring in the ranking like that?
 
If I just go after blog comment and forums links, would I really bring in the ranking like that?

It all depends on yoru niche and how competitive it is, but of you have even some competition these links will not get you rankings, maybe you get some name branding because you put in a lot of time creating good content on other people's sites, but for rankings/SEO this method just isn't enough imho

Dave
 
Good, what's the monetization way in your case site? is this a way to go for amazon affiliate? do you use this strategy for amazon affiliate/clickbank affiliate? Is it valid for adsense? thanks

Currently using advertisements to monetize the traffic to that specific website.

Great share man. You should add more article on your blog . I love your blog also .

I'm working on them every day. :)

i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?

Still waiting for the 24k 90 days answer

Not sure what 24k in 90 days you's are talking about?

It all depends on yoru niche and how competitive it is, but of you have even some competition these links will not get you rankings, maybe you get some name branding because you put in a lot of time creating good content on other people's sites, but for rankings/SEO this method just isn't enough imho

Dave

Did you not see the ranking graph? That's one of multiple websites ranking for keywords that being in tens of millions of searches per month. The rankings are continuing to rise, and I plan on continuing to build more links just like the ones I've been doing.

rank4.jpg
 
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?
i have a similar question. 24K in 90 days which means around 266 links/day. How would you do it manually?

-this (not said by me originally)
 
I completely agree. :) I've been doing completely natural SEO for the last several months and although it takes longer, I'm having a lot of fantastic success with it.
Great post. I'm glad that someone else actually sees it. If you structure the site correctly on top of the natural SEO you can utterly kill it. I'm literally ditching the tools. There just isn't a need for them. They basically just spam the crap out of everything. They are in essence working a loop hole. That's the reason they constantly have to be updated because Google and other companies are constantly trying to stop people from using them. Which means the spun articles and crap links will not get you where you want in the long run.

I've tested them in the past and gotten quick results but it's not a long term solution. If you do it right you can sleep at night.
 
It all depends on yoru niche and how competitive it is, but of you have even some competition these links will not get you rankings, maybe you get some name branding because you put in a lot of time creating good content on other people's sites, but for rankings/SEO this method just isn't enough imho

Dave
AS OP said, he put in two months mainly creating blog comment and forum post links, which bring in awesome result... Greatly.
 
in your SERPBook screenshot, the backlinks of your site shows 24113

HclbByN


you mention you build links manually, just wandering how you can build that many in 90 days.

Here is one website I've been working on over the last 3 months.

:)
 
AS OP said, he put in two months mainly creating blog comment and forum post links, which bring in awesome result... Greatly.

How can you tell, you don't know what his niche is, maybe he uses very easy longtails without any real competition, don't believe everything you read and see, especially when people are promoting their own sites in an blatant attempt to brand themselves as a SEO guru ...

Just saying...
 
Yeah, thanks for the share OP. I could definitey be doing this more. A timeley reminder. Cheers.
 
in your SERPBook screenshot, the backlinks of your site shows 24113

you mention you build links manually, just wandering how you can build that many in 90 days.

Oh haha, I didn't see that. 2 of my (around 100 backlinks total) are sitewide links that I exchanged with people in the same niche as me.

Great post. I'm glad that someone else actually sees it. If you structure the site correctly on top of the natural SEO you can utterly kill it. I'm literally ditching the tools. There just isn't a need for them. They basically just spam the crap out of everything. They are in essence working a loop hole. That's the reason they constantly have to be updated because Google and other companies are constantly trying to stop people from using them. Which means the spun articles and crap links will not get you where you want in the long run.


I've tested them in the past and gotten quick results but it's not a long term solution. If you do it right you can sleep at night.

Exactly. I've used tools and services for years but never had long term success with either. Google rolls out an update, tons of websites die, rinse and repeat. With a natural link profile, it's very, very unlikely for that to happen.

AS OP said, he put in two months mainly creating blog comment and forum post links, which bring in awesome result... Greatly.


What I said was using a "natural looking link profile". What that means is forum signature links, forum posts, blog posts, blog comments, web 2.0 links, social bookmarks, Q/A sites, Wikipedia links, Wiki links. You name the link type, I have made it.

How can you tell, you don't know what his niche is, maybe he uses very easy longtails without any real competition, don't believe everything you read and see, especially when people are promoting their own sites in an blatant attempt to brand themselves as a SEO guru ...


Just saying...

Never claimed to be a guru. I'm just sharing what I've learned along the way all these years. :)

also this method also looks like a ripoff of Meathead amazon method


That's a great looking thread, thanks for the link!

Some tips are good. Natural SEO activities always gives rewards.

It does. It may take longer, but it really does work.

Yeah, thanks for the share OP. I could definitey be doing this more. A timeley reminder. Cheers.

Anyone that wants a good, gradual growth website that stands the test of time really should be doing this right from the get-go. It's something that's easy to do, and that you control.
 
Oh haha, I didn't see that. 2 of my (around 100 backlinks total) are sitewide links that I exchanged with people in the same niche as me.


1. you didn't share that in original post, what else are you hiding?

2. if 100 links are these site wide exchange links, what about the other 24000?


Here is the question, plain and simple:

Serp book is picking up 24000 back links on your site. Are you saying you made each of these back links yourself, following the method you detailed in the OP?
 
Back
Top