WordPress Uniquefier Plugin?

does work without destroying Tags, for instance PhpPro?
 
Just bought it and was wondering if anyone knows if it changes previous posts or just new ones?
 
This is just a test to show how the html codes are inserted.
... ohhh that's odd ...
this not only destroys the words but insert a lot of html in text(the quantity of plain text must take over the code). google may index the pages but i doubt any page will ever be in top.

@da buck
he says all posts.
 
Just bought it and was wondering if anyone knows if it changes previous posts or just new ones?

It changes everything, new and old.

The change is not permanent but on the fly.

This explains why c*opy*sc*ape gives different results since the code in the pages is different everytime the page is called.
 
Man it's $10!!! just buy it

Just because you had to pay for it don't mean the rest of us want to!

Anyway, My phpbay and wpauction sites quit showing ebay auctions with this plugin activated. Good thing I got to it test before I wasted $10!

Thanks "blackhit" for saving me $10
 
Last edited:
It works with phpbay sites too but you need to replace this code:

function edit($text)
{
$letters1="abcde";
$letters2="fghij";
$letters3="klmno";
$letters4="pqrst";
$letters5="uvwxy";

srand((float) microtime() * 10000000);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters1[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters1[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters2[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters2[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters3[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters3[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters4[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters4[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters5[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters5[$the_letter]),$text);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter])),$text);

return ">".$text."<";
}


with this

function edit($text)
{
$pos=strpos($text,"phpbay");
if ($pos === false)
{
$letters1="abcde";
$letters2="fghij";
$letters3="klmno";
$letters4="pqrst";
$letters5="uvwxy";

srand((float) microtime() * 10000000);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters1[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters1[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters2[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters2[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters3[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters3[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters4[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters4[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters5[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters5[$the_letter]),$text);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter])),$text);

return ">".$text."<";
}
else
{
return ">".$text."<";
}
}


Hope this helps!
 
This sux :)

Google see the html code like us! And after one week of use, the copyscape detect the original articles :).
I stop use it!
 
How are you able to determine this? I haven't been able to figure out how to tell if it's working.
 
You should be able to tell if it's working (or not) based on the results in the g00gle webmaster tools area. You can check the search queries tab which shows what queries people ran which resulted in your site being shown. If your results suddenly start to drop off a cliff, I guess google isn't "translating" the funky characters and is just spidering pages of gibberish. Of course you have to wait for updates and their may be some cached data or something but that shits over my head. I just check back every couple days and check the results for a test site I have this thing on.

If it looks like it's working great, if not you need to ask yourself what's more important indexed pages or SERP results. Their are ways to use both to your advantage.
 
From a blackhat point of view this works... anything in the SERPS that you can't see... but the googlebots can pick up on... is blackhat... i'm not saying i dont support this program... it's good for blogfarms that you want to create in a short timespan and spamm them... (hrmm just came up with a good idea on that thought lol) and then maybe link to your site... this should be great for review sites... scraped articles sites... etc...

i WOULD NOT... and i'm sure all you grest smart people realize this already use this for my main and/or important sites... as per warning...

this is a great overall tool and does what it says... it's well worth the developer's $10 i have purchased it myself and think it's still no good for good quality websites... godd i always keep asking myself when someone is going to create like a scraper of quality... an aggregator with human readable markov chains... (we might have to ask nike and their sweatshop departments to come up with a better thought) but as per now... the best way to do it is to use articles... and try and automate it the best you can using some of the tools on this site... remember this guy also created the w0rd*pr3ss Art1cl3 Re*writer and that did turn your articles completely unique almost 80%-90% and most of you are going whoa! 80 to 90% unique... but you have to realize the ratio at which the content is readable as well which gives you a 20 to 10% readable rate... completely rediculous... you need a fair balance of the two... i CANNOT stress this enough...

gluck in your search up the SERPS

-the f00f
 
Anyone scraping content or pulling rss feeds to there blogs and if this is working this would be a powerful combination of having massive pages of unique content for free.
 
This tool destroys some things. For example the image-div containers are fucked up after activating :(

Using v1, perhaps it changed in v2. :(
 
I've been using it for about 2 months now and haven't seen any difference in the number of pages indexed at all. I'm probably going to just deactivate it.
 
I've been using it since v1 first came out. I've since deactivated it on all sites.

Take it from me - it absolutely makes zero difference to your rankings and traffic. In fact if anything my traffic went down.
 
I have purchased Uniquifier yesterday and have installed it on my personal Ultimate AutoPress configuration I host all my scrapper blogs on, and it works as charm, it totally screws Copyscape's ability to recognize the article while it plays perfectly fair with the readers and Google. It also plays perfectly smooth with every other plugin such as Feedwordpress and ContentRewrite, etc... I could share the very smart trick it utilizes but that wouldn't be fair - it can be easily reproduced by other guys and the author deserves 15$ for coming up with it.
 
Back
Top