wikis pambot crashing again and again
- Thread starter moink12
- Start date
Kikerinka
Elite Member
- Dec 18, 2010
- 2,584
- 9,440
I own this bot for quite a time (since version 1.0). It's a good bot for wikis, however with some big minuses, similarly to other wiki bots available.
It's a shame that people who create these bots and software products just rarely have at least average knowledge of SEO... This Wiki Spam Bot could be very powerful, if little details would be coded differently...
At the current state, it's not very useful.. I mean, if you use it as an average user with lists provided with the software, it will most likely hurt your rankings.
If you use it like an advanced user and have your own wiki lists, it can slightly improves your rankings...
But as I said before, it's a shame, because if it was coded just a little differently, it could be more powerful and deliver actual results.
It's a shame that people who create these bots and software products just rarely have at least average knowledge of SEO... This Wiki Spam Bot could be very powerful, if little details would be coded differently...
At the current state, it's not very useful.. I mean, if you use it as an average user with lists provided with the software, it will most likely hurt your rankings.
If you use it like an advanced user and have your own wiki lists, it can slightly improves your rankings...
But as I said before, it's a shame, because if it was coded just a little differently, it could be more powerful and deliver actual results.
extremephp
BANNED
- Oct 19, 2010
- 1,288
- 1,281
My tool handles wikis much more efficiently than other tools I know 
Not blabbering, but there may be better ones, but I dont know of any as of now.
The BST thread is under review, and it would be be in BHW very soon.
Not blabbering, but there may be better ones, but I dont know of any as of now.The BST thread is under review, and it would be be in BHW very soon.
My tool handles wikis much more efficiently than other tools I know
The BST thread is under review, and it would be be in BHW very soon.
official link ?
TheMatrix
BANNED
- Dec 20, 2008
- 3,439
- 7,401
blackkaviar
Registered Member
- Jul 31, 2011
- 91
- 15
I've tried both wikispambot and EWP. EWP is even worse! It keeps crashing and when it doesnt the success rate still very low compare to wikispambot.
Wikispambot is not that great though, but currently I cant find any better wiki bot for that.
Can you clarify why you think the current state not useful for SEO (or you even said hurt the ranking?) As far as I know these wiki links especially some edu which are also included should be good enough for mr G.
But I agree if we can provide our own list it would be even better. I found some list but it's not much help. The success rate is very low.
Can anyone kind enough to give some good wiki list?
extremephp
BANNED
- Oct 19, 2010
- 1,288
- 1,281
It keeps crashing? Well, tell me when does it crash.
If you are using Deathbycaptcha, and when their API crashes due to some reason, which infact crashes their DLL file, the Software crashes. I cant really control DBC. So instead, I am planning to add more services like DBC. Captcha Sniper be done soon as soon as they support recaptcha.
And about success rate, if your post has words that are censored, they wont be posted. And if you are just using a post like " Hello this is my site yoursite.com" it will fail, as you are dealing with Wikis which arent one liner stuff. Although we have something added to the bot so that it bypasses that check almost everytime.
And well, can you please let me know your Paypal email as you say you have a license.
And again, if you are talking about the free one I shared, you should better call it Wikibot, and not EWP.
Last edited:
blackhatchampion
Senior Member
- Dec 29, 2010
- 1,069
- 552
I am looking for good wiki software.
Kikerinka
Elite Member
- Dec 18, 2010
- 2,584
- 9,440
Who told you that these WIKI links are good for SEO? You think so because some threads here have 5 stars? Did you actually see any improvements on your own sites?
I spent one week, about 8 hours a day, just working with various wiki bots, testing a lot, doing a lot of direct blasts as well as indirect blasts. Many blasts were done with pictures (especially mac OS wiki and wikawiki) and other cool stuff you probably never tested. However, as I said, because these bots are crap and WIKI links are most likely also crap, the results are negligible... I am not going to advice here the developers why their software is crap. I mean, they should figure it out by themselves or take someone who knows something about SEO to tell them that...
Test it yourself to see. However, I do not recommend you to base your strategy on wiki links at all. You are just wasting your time.
I spent one week, about 8 hours a day, just working with various wiki bots, testing a lot, doing a lot of direct blasts as well as indirect blasts. Many blasts were done with pictures (especially mac OS wiki and wikawiki) and other cool stuff you probably never tested. However, as I said, because these bots are crap and WIKI links are most likely also crap, the results are negligible... I am not going to advice here the developers why their software is crap. I mean, they should figure it out by themselves or take someone who knows something about SEO to tell them that...
Test it yourself to see. However, I do not recommend you to base your strategy on wiki links at all. You are just wasting your time.
blackhatchampion
Senior Member
- Dec 29, 2010
- 1,069
- 552
- Sep 17, 2010
- 3,838
- 185
I agree too. I have some purchased Wiki bots before but it ends out as craps. To make it worse after making quick sales from their bots the developer disappear with no support for their bots. Thats my opinion.
