wikipedia backlinks

C

concrete

Junior Member

Jul 11, 2012

120

11

• Aug 16, 2012

• #1

Anyone have them? I put one up for my business a few weeks ago and it is still there. Do you know if they are ******** or not?

 

S

skrode

Junior Member

Nov 13, 2011

103

17

• Aug 16, 2012

• #2

they are what?

 

C

concrete

Junior Member

Jul 11, 2012

120

11

• Aug 16, 2012
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

do or no. I didn't know that was a bad word on here..

 

C

concrete

Junior Member

Jul 11, 2012

120

11

• Aug 17, 2012
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #4

follow

 

Lazlo1967

Junior Member

Aug 15, 2012

198

55

• Aug 17, 2012

• #5

All Wikipedia links are nofollow!

 

C

concrete

Junior Member

Jul 11, 2012

120

11

• Aug 17, 2012
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #6

dang that sucks. I was hoping to get a good backlink out of them. oh well. Maybe I will still get a few visitors from there.

 

S

singhavn

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Jun 20, 2012

3,255

404

• Aug 17, 2012

• #7

I provide them to my client's and they always benefit from them. You can use it in small no. directly on money site and in more no.s as second tier etc.

 

verilix

Elite Member

Sep 18, 2009

3,095

1,355

• Aug 17, 2012

• #8

concrete said:

dang that sucks. I was hoping to get a good backlink out of them. oh well. Maybe I will still get a few visitors from there.

Click to expand...

Any link from Wikipedia is a good link; I dunno what the hell you're talking about.

 

jkwilson78

Regular Member

Jun 24, 2010

224

313

• Aug 20, 2012

• #9

yeah, if that link sticks it will help in come capacity for sure. You should be proud of the link actually!

 

Glenn BH

Regular Member

Nov 10, 2010

324

274

• Aug 21, 2012

• #10

concrete said:

dang that sucks. I was hoping to get a good backlink out of them. oh well.

Click to expand...

NF doesn't mean it sucks It's sill a good backlink.

 

Autumn

Elite Member

Nov 18, 2010

2,197

3,073

• Aug 21, 2012

• #11

I think Wikipedia links are good... They may be n0follow but that doesn't mean that they are useless, and you are still getting a good link from a kick ass authority domain.

Also the direct traffic that you get from a Wikipedia link is excellent quality. I know someone who managed to get a link on the the page for Netbooks going to his online store... It only stuck for about 8 hours but he made $1600 in commissions in that time.

 

B

BobbaHead

Registered Member

Jun 8, 2012

89

3

• Aug 22, 2012

• #12

Yep, eventhough the links are no-follow, wikipedia are highly authrotive thus it's a good think that your site is pointing from their website to yours.

 

ethanmitchel

Regular Member

Dec 13, 2011

355

122

• Aug 23, 2012

• #13

It also depends how you're directing those links to you. If you're just using software and spamming then it's reaaaally risky if you're planning on keeping your site in good ranking after next google update, but if you're just up for the kill and want fast results just direct them to web2.0 sites that link to your website. But if you can manually add them and you KNOW they are good quality (even though one might think that any link from them is good since it's wikipedia) just direct them to your money site.