mrgreengreen
Newbie
- Jul 4, 2021
- 31
- 22
I was wondering If the links that comes from wikipedia to your website has any good influence on your ranking, and if so does get better with multiple links from multiple articles on wikipedia?
so does it mean that one link from wikipedia could have the same effect as having multiple links from there?Wikipedia is good for backlinks.
But you can't just depend on it.
For a long term effect, it's better to get backlinks from multiple authoritative websites and not just one.
No, one link won't move the needle. You need to build backlinks from other websites also.so does it mean that one link from wikipedia could have the same effect as having multiple links from there?
it does helpI was wondering If the links that comes from wikipedia to your website has any good influence on your ranking, and if so does get better with multiple links from multiple articles on wikipedia?
Yes, the more, the better. They are one of the best linking sources.I was wondering If the links that comes from wikipedia to your website has any good influence on your ranking, and if so does get better with multiple links from multiple articles on wikipedia?
I can see what you mean, as the more natural the backlink is the better chances it has.No, one link won't move the needle. You need to build backlinks from other websites also.
1 backlink from Wikipedia to a single page with low competiton can help that specific page to rank but can't help to improve ranking of website as a whole.
I would not build more than 5 backlinks from Wikipedia to whole of my website. When you start to push too much with a particular type of backlinks only, it's better to calm down and think logically.
now that everyone is saying wikipedia does give you authority I think the biggest question that everyone is probably asking and I doubt anyone on this forum have the right answer to it is can we put a measurement to the amount of authorty it gives. so you could know what backlink is worth it and what is not.Wikipedia links help you to quickly gain trust and authority. For example, if you get backlinks from Wikipedia pages for SEO, keyword research, content marketing, blogging, backlinks etc., then Google will identify you as an authority in SEO.
well I don't think you will get banned if you have more than one link from wikipedia if the link appears naturally on the post.it does help
i would not try to get more than 1 link, because the chance of the admins finding out and deleting your link from all wikipedia posts grows with each link you add. last thing you want to happen is to have your site blacklisted and never be able to get a legitimated wikipedia link in future.
thanks for your answer, but when you say one of the best you mean it equal to .edu or .gov or same as youtube maybe better or slightly better than bloggerYes, the more, the better. They are one of the best linking sources.
well I don't think you will get banned if you have more than one link from wikipedia if the link appears naturally on the post.
Almost identical to .gov and .edu regardless if they are nofollow. Don't be folled by that rel tagthanks for your answer, but when you say one of the best you mean it equal to .edu or .gov or same as youtube maybe better or slightly better than blogger
yes wikipedia is finest platform to boost your website ranking. I totally agree with you that we can't only depend on it. We have to get quality backlinks from our niche related authority sites for better rankingWikipedia is good for backlinks.
But you can't just depend on it.
For a long term effect, it's better to get backlinks from multiple authoritative websites and not just one.
so, you're saying that Google treats a backlink with 'rel=nofollow' from Wikipedia in the same way as a 'do follow' backlink? If this is what you mean, did you run any experiments? any proof?Almost identical to .gov and .edu regardless if they are nofollow. Don't be folled by that rel tag
so, you're saying that Google treats a backlink with 'rel=nofollow' from Wikipedia in the same way as a 'do follow' backlink? If this is what you mean, did you run any experiments? any proof?
so, you're saying that Google treats a backlink with 'rel=nofollow' from Wikipedia in the same way as a 'do follow' backlink? If this is what you mean, did you run any experiments? any proof?
are there any changes after a while?I got a wikipedia backlinks and got a huge boost in rank for about a day. The traffic was phenomenal from Wikipedia itself, but google dropped to nothing while the wiki traffic continued to roll in.
It's been different depending on which site I've tried this with. Usually a little rank boost that lasts but the traffic fluctuates based on if the topic is trending or not.are there any changes after a while?