I didn't come up with the lion analogy.
It is the government's job to keep an eye on the big banks/big businesses that have huge effects on our economy.
There are clearly loopholes in our government that companies can exploit, but the government also has power to close those loopholes up before they get out of control. I've mentioned Ron Paul already, but he was one of the few people that actually stood up against stuff like this. If we would have had a congress like Ron Paul we would have caught the bubble before it collapsed.
Actually, there's no way the government can pass laws to regulate banks and business as long as campaign finance gives power to whoever goes along with businesses. We need an amendment to prevent that.
The Glass-Steagall act was made specifically to prevent the kind of speculation that the big banks were doing. There's no talk about bringing it back.
If ANYONE really wants to understand what happened, read
"How Markets Fail". It tells EXACTLY what happened, and why it happened. It also explains that free markets usually work in setting prices, but in the financial market, the free market system WILL break because feedback loops get reversed.
For example, if a price goes up too much in a normal free market, the amount bought will drop. But in housing, people bought and paid MORE because they expected prices to continue to rise. So the market got overheated and caused a bubble.
It also talks about the problem that banks and rating agencies had - the rating agencies kept high ratings on home loan financial instruments traded by banks, pension funds, hedge funds, etc. The rating agencies were forced to let up on standards, or they'd lose business to the competition.
It's a good read explaining exactly how things go wrong, when the system breaks and people get rewarded for doing precisely the wrong thing.