Why would a Proxy be good for one social network but not another?

I've seen some proxy services say their proxies are good on Instagram, but not Twitter... or vise versa.


What is the reasoning behind a proxy service saying their proxies are no good on a specific social network, but fine on the others?

because most proxies are not really pure there used not just yours....

real virgin proxies are grate but most ppl have moved onto resedentual ip

socail website and bot opinion only.

public ip 《《《《《 shite
share proxie 《《《 shite
virgin proxie 《《《 60% shite know
virgin ipv6 《《《《 shite
resedentual ip 《《《 perfect

one problem the virgin proxies are very hard to get as real virgins but when got them your do ok but resedentual ip will work flawless but very exspensive...

if you think about it , we all use resedentual ip to log into websites all day from home , we make accounts and all sorts from home , so it resedentual ip needed these days ...

ipv6
is a new ip address method in computing because ipv4 has run out of ip address , so untill home internet services start using ipv6 ip address for there clients there always suffer , it a shame because the ipv6 ip address a lot cheaper, they do work on socail websites but sometimes also don't, it like a cross match problem , like I say the more the ipv4 completely run out and ipv6 will eventually be standard .....

There are probably two group of providers - those just marketing it and there would be no difference and those who are flagging them correctly as people're using them.

oh of course really it is interesting...