Ampro Tech
Regular Member
- Sep 11, 2012
- 324
- 55
Though I understand that content at tier1 web2.0 must be unique but why the readability factor as I dont want to rank them? Is to just make sure that these web2.0 dont get deleted by admins ?
Why readable content in web2.0
- Thread starter Ampro Tech
- Start date
wowhaxor
Elite Member
- Apr 28, 2007
- 1,924
- 3,371
There are a number of factors including the fact that proper kW research can put your Web 2.0 at the top of results and get real traffic to your site not just for SEO, the avoiding of manual reviews, the fact that natural is always better as Google is always improving why do something that may be useless in the future, etc.
I just did a detailed write up on how I do my authority web 2.0s (it's specifically for .EDU blog posts but applies to any Web 2.0 blog/article property) so if you have questions you can read it and not only see what I do but learn why I do these things:
http://www.searchengineoptimal.com/...ith-best-practices-for-seobacklinks-tutorial/
I just did a detailed write up on how I do my authority web 2.0s (it's specifically for .EDU blog posts but applies to any Web 2.0 blog/article property) so if you have questions you can read it and not only see what I do but learn why I do these things:
http://www.searchengineoptimal.com/...ith-best-practices-for-seobacklinks-tutorial/
- Aug 25, 2015
- 5,523
- 2,859
Google is always updating so might as well be prepared and make sure your content isn't complete spam.
I spin my web 2.0 content manually with TBS. I personally spin at phrase, sentence, paragraph and then finally word level. Also throw in a couple blank sentences in my spins.
Don't think too hard into it, the point is to make it random and appear unique.
I spin my web 2.0 content manually with TBS. I personally spin at phrase, sentence, paragraph and then finally word level. Also throw in a couple blank sentences in my spins.
Don't think too hard into it, the point is to make it random and appear unique.
T2tkid
Elite Member
- Oct 13, 2010
- 5,019
- 2,479
I have tried both. And trust me, spunned web2.0s do go out the serp in the long run.
But web2.0s with unique content with videos and more than 3x400 words always climb the serp no matter how many links I build to it.
I will go for Unique content any day.
But web2.0s with unique content with videos and more than 3x400 words always climb the serp no matter how many links I build to it.
I will go for Unique content any day.
charliebrooker
Senior Member
- Feb 16, 2014
- 861
- 328
1. Google is getting better at spotting crap.
2. If it ranks you want people so read and click.
3. If you want to build the power of that link, it needs to survive, so it has to pass a manual review.
Build for the long term and stop thinking you can fill the net with shit and rank forever.
2. If it ranks you want people so read and click.
3. If you want to build the power of that link, it needs to survive, so it has to pass a manual review.
Build for the long term and stop thinking you can fill the net with shit and rank forever.
accelerator_dd
Elite Member
- May 14, 2010
- 2,447
- 1,022
1. So it doenst get removed by moderators - imagine all thsoe tier2 links and above going to waste and you losing those ranks you gained
2. So it doesnt get banned by google - read above for consequences
3. So a future penalty doesnt wipe it out - read 2.
4. So it ranks and gets you a bit more traffic
2. So it doesnt get banned by google - read above for consequences
3. So a future penalty doesnt wipe it out - read 2.
4. So it ranks and gets you a bit more traffic